|
|
Waterville, Washington civil litigation lawyer represented Defendant sued by a homeowners' association seeking to enforce a restrictive covenant restricting vacation rental of residence for vacation. |
|
Seattle, Washington criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged for making interstate threats and for a hate crime: interference with a Federally Protected Activity. Joey David George ... More... $0 (12-16-2022 - WA) |
|
Seattle, Washington criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with making interstate threats and committing a hate crime for interference with a federally protected activity. |
|
Seattle, Washington civil litigation lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant seeking injunctive and declaratory relief. |
|
Seattle, Washington criminal defense attorney represented defendant charged with Conspiracy to Mail Threatening Communications, to Commit Stalking, and to Interfere with Federally Protected Activitie. |
|
Seattle, Washington criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with committing an act of violence against a railroad carrier. |
|
Seattle, WA: Violence against a railroad carrier criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant Ellen Brennan Reiche, age 28, who was arrested on the BNSF Railway tracks near Bellingham, near midnight on November 28, 2020. She was charged with placing a ‘shunt’ – a device that interferes with train signals – on the tracks. |
United States of America v. Cameron Shea |
Seattle, Washington hate crime charge criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant, Cameron Shea, 25, a leader of the neo-Nazi group Atomwaffen Division, pled guilty to federal conspiracy and hate crime charges for threatening journalists and advocates who worked to expose anti-Semitism. |
United States of America v. Daniel Nix |
![]() Seattle, WA - Kirkland, Washington Business Owner Sentenced to 5 Years in Prison for Two Decade Scheme to Avoid Paying Income Taxes Set up Fraudulent Corporations, Filed Frivolous Claims and Sent Forged Money Orders to Evade Taxes The ... More... $0 (12-09-2018 - WA) |
Debra Lea Wilson v. James Rigby; First Citizens Bank |
The filing date of a bankruptcy petition determines the |
American Freedom Defense Initiative v. King County |
![]() King County provides public transportation in the greater Seattle metropolitan area. The County finances its transit operations in part by selling advertising space on the exterior of buses. Although many municipalities restrict advertising t... More... $0 (09-30-2018 - WA) |
Friends of Moon Creek, et al v. Diamond Lake Improvement Ass'n, et al.
Washington Court of Appeals, Division III - Spoken, Washington |
After ruling on summary judgment that Sharon Sorby did not |
United States of America v. Joseph Daniel Hudek, IV
Western District of Washington Federal Courthouse - Seattle, Washington |
Seattle, WA - Florida Man Who Assaulted Airline Flight Crew and Passengers Enroute to China Pleads Guilty |
United States of America v. David D. Delay
Western District of Washington Federal Courthouse - Seattle, Washington |
Seattle, WA - Seattle Area Man Convicted of 17 Federal Felonies for Scheme to Exploit Young Women and Juveniles in Prostitution - Defendant Posed as Documentary Filmmaker to Entice and Blackmail Women into Commercial Sex Activity |
United States of America v. David D. Delay
Western District of Washington Federal Courthouse - Seattle, Washington |
Seattle, WA - Seattle Area Man Convicted of Multiple Counts of Sex Trafficking by Force, Fraud, or Coercion, Sex Trafficking of a Minor, and Production of Child Pornography |
Quinault Indian Nation v. Mary Linda Pearson
Federal Courthouse - Seattle, Washington |
Once again, the issue of tribal sovereign immunity and |
State of Washington v. Mouad Aimane Elbou |
Seattle, WA - Jury Finds Man Not Guilty Of Abducting His Son |
Susan H. Chadd v. United States of America |
Seattle, WA - Ninth Circuit reverses grant of Tort Claim summary judgment on wrongful death claim |
Woods View II, LLC v. Kitsap County |
Appellants Woods View II, LLC (WVII) and Darlene Piper appeal |
Kitsap County v. Kitsap Rifle and Revolver Club |
The Kitsap Rifle and Revolver Club appeals from the trial court' s decision |
Kelly Samson v. City of Bainbridge Island |
“Full indeed is earth of woes, and full the sea,” remarked Hesiod,1 and reviewing the long odyssey of Kelly and Sally Samson, we are inclined to agree. The pair own waterfront property in picturesque Blakely Harbor in the City of Bainbridge Island. They devoutly wished to build a pier or a dock on their property during a time when local authorities had imposed a moratorium on such projects. Th... More... $0 (06-18-2012 - WA) |
Karl Thun v. City Of Bonney Lake |
The ripeness doctrine ensures that regulatory takings claims are not |
Kevin Dolan v. King County |
In Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S. Ct. 792, 9 L. Ed. 2d 799 (1963), the United States Supreme Court guaranteed to indigents the right of legal representation at public expense. King County, like other local governments in this state, sought ways to provide the required defense services to indigent criminal defendants. After investigating several different models, the county settled... More... $0 (08-18-2011 - WA) |
Curtis Oswalt v. Resolute Industries, Inc. |
In this admiralty case, Resolute Industries, Inc., appeals an adverse summary judgment on its products liability claims against Webasto Products NA, Inc., the manufacturer of a heater that caught fire on Curtis Oswalt’s boat during repairs performed by Resolute’s employee. Resolute also challenges a judgment in Oswalt’s favor on his claim against Resolute for breach of the implied warranty o... More... $0 (06-16-2011 - WA) |
Linda Eastwood dba KK Farm v. Horse Harbor Foundation, Inc. |
Since the 1800s, lessors of real property in Washington |
Jesus Alcazar v. The Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle |
“The First Amendment has erected a wall between church and state. That wall must be kept high and impregnable. We could not approve the slightest breach.” Everson v. Bd. of Educ., 330 U.S. 1, 18 (1947). The interplay between the First Amendment’s Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses creates an exception to an otherwise fully applicable statute if the statute would interfere with a religio... More... $0 (03-16-2010 - WA) |
Jesus Alcazar v. The Corporation of the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle |
“The First Amendment has erected a wall between church and state. That wall must be kept high and impregnable. We could not approve the slightest breach.” Everson v. Bd. of Educ., 330 U.S. 1, 18 (1947). The interplay between the First Amendment’s Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses creates an exception to an otherwise fully applicable statute if the statute would interfere with a religio... More... $0 (03-16-2010 - WA) |
Stormans, Inc. v. Mary Selecky, Secretary of the Washington State Department of Health, et al. |
We must decide whether the district court abused its discretion by preliminarily enjoining the enforcement of new rules promulgated by the Washington State Board of Pharmacy (“Board”) that require pharmacies to deliver lawfully prescribed Federal Drug Administration (“FDA”)–approved medications and prohibit discrimination against patients, on the ground that the rules violate pharmacies... More... $0 (10-30-2009 - WA) |
Pamela L. Myers v. State of Washington, Department of Social & Health Services |
This appeal follows the summary dismissal of an action for |
Michael James Berger, aka Magic Mike v. City of Seattle, Virginia Anderson, et al. |
In 2002, the City of Seattle promulgated a set of rules governing the conduct of visitors to one of its major attractions, an 80-acre public park and entertainment complex known as the Seattle Center. The new rules regulated for the first time the behavior of the Center’s street performers. We consider today the constitutional validity of some of those rules. |
Zango, Inc. v. Kaspersky Lab, Inc. |
We must decide whether a distributor of Internet security software is entitled to immunity under the safe harbor provision of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. § 230, from a suit claiming that its software interfered with the use of downloadable programs by customers of an online media company. |
Daniel McClung, et al. v. City of Sumner |
In 1995, Daniel and Andrea McClung (the “McClungs”) sought to develop property they owned in the City of Sumner (the “City”), and learned that their underground storm drain pipe did not meet the City’s requirement for new developments to include pipes at least 12 inches in diameter. The McClungs assert that the City’s subsequent request that they install a 24-inch pipe in exchange for ... More... $0 (12-09-2008 - WA) |
Daniel McClung, et al. v. Tapps Brewing, Inc. |
In 1995, Daniel and Andrea McClung (the “McClungs”) sought to develop property they owned in the City of Sumner (the “City”), and learned that their underground storm drain pipe did not meet the City’s requirement for new developments to include pipes at least 12 inches in diameter. The McClungs assert that the City’s subsequent request that they install a 24-inch pipe in exchange for ... More... $0 (09-25-2008 - WA) |
Robinette Amaker v. King County, et al. |
In this case arising out of diversity jurisdiction, we are asked to decide whether Robinette Amaker, the surviving sister of Bradley Gierlich, may bring suit against defendants King County, Stanley Medical Research Institute (“SMRI”), and E. Fuller Torrey, after the King County Medical Examiners Office (“KCMEO”) provided Bradley’s1 brain, liver, and spleen tissue to SMRI for use in medic... More... $0 (08-30-2008 - WA) |
Michael J. Shanks, et al. v. Vincet G. Dressel, et al. |
Vincent and Janet Dressel (the “Dressels”) are developers who remodel and convert private homes into student residences. A group of homeowners and community organizations (collectively, “Logan Neighborhood”), concerned that the Dressels’ construction was degrading and devaluing the historic character of their neighborhood, brought suit in federal district court seeking injunctive and dec... More... $0 (08-27-2008 - WA) |
Cody Soter, a minor child, et al. v. Cowles Publishing Company |
Nine-year-old Nathan Walters died after ingesting part of a peanut butter cookie, which was served to him in a school lunch on a school field trip. The school district had been aware that Nathan was severely allergic to peanuts, but it did not provide him with a special lunch, nor did school personnel administer epinephrine soon enough to prevent his death. The school di... More... $0 (12-27-2007 - WA) |
Heather Andersen, et al. v. King County, et al. |
The trial courts in these consolidated cases held that the provisions of Washington's 1998 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) that prohibit same-sex marriages are facially unconstitutional under the privileges and immunities and due process clauses of the Washington State Constitution. King County and the State of Washington have appealed. The plaintiffs-respondents, gay and lesbian couples,... More... $0 (07-27-2006 - WA) |
Barbara V. Hudson v. James Craven, et al. |
The World Trade Organization ("WTO") is the international organization charged with dealing with the rules of trade between nations. In late November 1999, top trade officials from WTO-member countries met in Seattle. The Seattle gathering gained national attention, not just for the policy debate on international trade issues but also because of the demonstrations and violence that occu... More... $0 (04-07-2005 - WA) |
Feature Realty, Inc. v. City of Spokane |
In 1992, Mission Springs, Inc. and Feature Realty, Inc. (collectively "Feature Realty") applied for and received permission from the Spokane City Council to build an apartment complex in Spokane, Washington. In 1995, Feature Realty brought suit against the city in Spokane County Superior Court, alleging the city wrongfully refused to issue a grading permit in connection with the property ... More... $0 (06-13-2003 - WA) |
USA and Dr. Alfred Aflatooni v. Kitsap Physicians Service, et al. |
It seems to be a fairly obvious notion that a False Claims Act suit ought to require a false claim. Yet, the plaintiffappellant in this case filed his action, proceeded to summary judgment, and prosecuted this appeal without ever seeing or presenting to a court a single false claim submitted by the defendants-appellees. This flaw is fatal to a qui tam1 action under the False Claims Act. Dr... More... $0 (12-18-2002 - WA) |