Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Ann Jackobeck v. Steve Amo and Springfield Catholic Diocese
Date: 09-28-2006
Case Number: Unknown
Judge: Constance Sweeney
Court: Superior Court, Hampden County, Massachusetts
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Tani E. Sapirstein, Sapirstein & Sapirstein P.C., Springfield, Massachusetts
Defendant's Attorney:
Maurice Cahillane of Egan, Flanagan and Cohen, P.C., Springfield, Massachusetts
Ann Jackobeck sued Steve Amo and Springfield Catholic Diocese on a defamation theory claiming that she was defamed by Amo who called her "a cancer within the parish" after she accused him of stealing money from the churck in 2002.
Defendants denied that they defamed Plaintiff.
About This Case
What was the outcome of Ann Jackobeck v. Steve Amo and Springfield Catholic Diocese?
The outcome was: Defendants' verdict.
Which court heard Ann Jackobeck v. Steve Amo and Springfield Catholic Diocese?
This case was heard in Superior Court, Hampden County, Massachusetts, MA. The presiding judge was Constance Sweeney.
Who were the attorneys in Ann Jackobeck v. Steve Amo and Springfield Catholic Diocese?
Plaintiff's attorney: Tani E. Sapirstein, Sapirstein & Sapirstein P.C., Springfield, Massachusetts. Defendant's attorney: Maurice Cahillane of Egan, Flanagan and Cohen, P.C., Springfield, Massachusetts.
When was Ann Jackobeck v. Steve Amo and Springfield Catholic Diocese decided?
This case was decided on September 28, 2006.