Verdict Search Results
Results
Showing 1 - 50 of 50144
State of Oklahoma v. Christian Rios Riosalidonio
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/57282/michael-french/" target="_new">Michael French</a> represented the Defendant charged with: AGGRAVATED DUI ALCOHOL AND / OR ALCOHOL, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902.D, which provides: D. Any person who is convicted of a violation of driving under the influence while also committing one of more of the following acts: 1. Driving, operating, or being in actual physical control of a motor vehicle while ha
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Winton Probes
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: ENDANGERING OTHERS WHILE ELUDING A POLICE OFFICER, in violation of 21 O.S. 540.A, which provides: A. Any operator of a motor vehicle who has received a visual and audible signal, a flashing red light, flashing red and blue lights, flashing blue and white lights, or any other combination of flashing red, blue, and white lights, and a siren from a peace officer driving a motor vehicle showing the same to be an
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Mohammad Qays Alshwalyat
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: ENDANGERING OTHERS WHILE ELUDING POLICE OFFICER, in violation of 21 O.S. 540, which provides: A. Any operator of a motor vehicle who has received a visual and audible signal, a flashing red light, flashing red and blue lights, flashing blue and white lights, or any other combination of flashing red, blue, and white lights, and a siren from a peace officer driving a motor vehicle showing the same to be an offi
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Darlene Beverly
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: ABUSE B Y CARETAKER, in violation of 21 O.S. 843.1,, amended to aggravated assault and battery in violation of 21 O.S. 646, which provides: A. An assault and battery becomes aggravated when committed under any of the following circumstances: 1. When great bodily injury is inflicted upon the person assaulted; or 2. When committed by a person of robust health or strength upon one who is aged, decrepit, or
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Anthony Gabino Serna
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with larceny of merchandise from a retailer in violation of 21 O.S. 1731, which provides: A. Larceny of merchandise held for sale in retail or wholesale establishments shall be punishable as follows: 1. For the first or second conviction, in the event the value of the goods, edible meat, or other corporeal property which has been taken is less than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00), the person shall be guilty of a mi
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Sire Brown
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: POSSESSION OF FIREARM AFTER JUVENILE ADJUDICATION, in violation of 21 O.S. 1283.D, which provides: D. It shall be unlawful for any person previously adjudicated as a delinquent child or a youthful offender for the commission of an offense, which would have constituted a felony offense if committed by an adult, to have in the possession of the person or under the immediate control of the person, or have in any veh
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Solomon Tuang
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: DOMESTIC ASSAULT OR ASSAULT AND BATTERY WITH A DANGEROUS WEAPON, in violation of 21 O.S. 644.D.1 D. Any person who, with intent to do bodily harm and without justifiable or excusable cause, commits any assault and battery upon an intimate partner or a family or household member as defined by Section 60.1 of Title 22 of the Oklahoma Statutes by means of any deadly weapon or by such other means or force that is
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Adrien Antoine Anderson
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: PHYSICAL CONTROL OF VEHICLE WHILE INTOXICATED - SECOND OFFENSE, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902.C2 UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DRUG, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-402(A)(1) RESISTING AN OFFICER, in violation of 21 O.S. 268 47 O.S. 11-902.C.2 provides: 2. Any person who, having been convicted of or having received deferred judgment for a violation of this section or a violation pursuant to the provisio
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Jessica Betsy Cormier
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: Enabling child sexual abuse in violation of 21 U.S. 843.5 (G), which provides: G. Any parent or other person who shall willfully or maliciously engage in enabling child sexual abuse shall, upon conviction, be guilty of a Class A3 felony offense and shall be punished by imprisonment in the custody of the Department of Corrections not exceeding life imprisonment, or by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Monisha Deshe Avington
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: Reported by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a> Larceny of merchandise from a retailer in violation of 21 O.S. 1731.
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Zarhry Brent Bailey
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: Reported by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a> Larceny of merchandise from a retailer in violation of 21 O.S. 1731.
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. D.D.P
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with cruelty to animals in violation of 21 O.S. 1685. Reported by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. M.D.S.
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with trafficking in illegal drugs in violaiton of 63 O.S. 2-402; possession of controlled drugs without a tax stamp in violation of 63 O.S. 450.1; and possession of a controlled drug in violation of 63 O.S. 2-402. ' Reported by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v.l Jayme Jo Turner
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: stalking in violation of 21 O.S. 1173; removing a monitoring device in violation of 21 O.S. 444; and placing obscene threatening or Harrasing phone call in violation of 21 O.S. 1172. Reported by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. C.I.S.
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal Defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with driving under the influence of alcohol in violation of <a href="https://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/deliverdocument.asp?citeid=439901" target="_new">47 O.S. 11-902</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Kenneth Burley and Keenan Cooper
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with burglary. Reported by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a> Kennth Burley, age 35, and Keenan Cooper, age 30, accused of stealing copper pripe from an air-conditioning unit at Henthorne Park.
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Dusty Randolph Wright
Claremore, Oklahoma, pro se Defendant was charged breach of rules of probation after pleading to grand larceny. CTFREE JUDGE LANDER FOR CROSSON; NO CR; ADA GRECO PRESENT FOR STATE; DFT PRESENT IN RCJ CUSTODY, PRO SE; CASE COMES ON FOR ARRAIGNMENT MOTION TO REVOKE; DFT RECEIVES INFORMATION, WAIVES READING, IDENTIFIERS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT. DFT ADVISED OF RIGHTS. DFT PROVIDED OIDS APPLICATION TO COMPLETE BEFORE NEXT COURT. MATTER SET 7-27-2026 AT 9AM, DFT RECOGNIZED BACK.
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. J.W.
Sapulpa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/132200/kent-morlan/" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a> represented the Defendant charged: 1. CARRYING FIREARM WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE 2. RECKLESS CONDUCT WITH A FIREARM
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. C.Y.
Tahlequah, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer <A HREF="https://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/132200/kent-morlan/" target="_new">Kent Morlan</A> represented the Defendant charged with: 1. DISSEMINATION OF PRIVATE SEXUAL IMAGES 2. STALKING Reported by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Breona McBee
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: child neglect. Reported by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a> Breona McBee gave birth three times during that period. Each newborn’s umbilical cord tested positive for drugs, including methamphetamines and amphetamines.
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. John Doe
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with domestic assault and battery. Reported by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a> In Oklahoma, the BIP program stands for the Batterers Intervention Program, a structured, 52-week educational initiative regulated and certified by the Oklahoma Attorney General to address and prevent domestic violence. Key Details of the ProgramPu
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Jerry Torrest Torres
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with DUI and driving without a license. Reported by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a> Jerry Torres Torres, age 30, turned left in front a Tulsa Police Car causing an accident.
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. R.L.O.
Chandler, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/132200/kent-morlan/" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a> represents the Defendant charged with obstructing an officer in violation of 21 O.S. 540 which provides: Any person who willfully delays or obstructs any public officer in the discharge or attempt to discharge any duty of his or her office, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this section shall preclude a person from recording the activity of law enforceme
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. J.L.W.
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with RECEIVE/POSSESS OR CONCEAL STOLEN PROPERTY - UNDER $1000, in violation of 21 O.S. 1713. Reported by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Marlis Learin Cunningham
Sapulpa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with delivery of a counterfeit note. Reported by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. John Fitgerald Neloms, jr.
Norman, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with first degree rape in violation of 21 O.S. 1114. In the early morning hours of November 21, 2007, four-year-old B.N. was sleeping on the floor of her family's living room in an apartment in Norman, Oklahoma. Her siblings and parents were asleep in their respective bedrooms. B.N.'s mother allowed B.N. to sleep in the living room because B.N. was suffering from an ear infection and had finally fallen asleep there.
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Luis Jimenez
Guymon, Oklalhoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: First Degree Rape, in violation of 21 O.S. 1114. ¶4 Jimenez now seeks a writ of certiorari raising two propositions of error each complaining of ineffective assistance of plea counsel. After thorough consideration of the entire record before us on appeal, including the original record, transcripts, and Jimenez's brief, we find that no relief is required under the law and evidence. Petitioner's Petition fo
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Michael William Rae
Sapulpa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: 1. ENDANGERING OTHERS WHILE ELUDING/ATTEMPTING TO ELUDE POLICE OFFICER 2. SPEEDING IN EXCESS OF LAWFUL MAXIMUM LIMIT 3. DRIVING WITHOUT A VALID DRIVER'S LICENSE 4. IMPROPER TAIL LAMPS/TAG LAMPS 5. OPERATING VEHICLE WITH EXPIRED/IMPROPER TAG/DECAL Reported by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Baylee Wayne Baber
Sapulpa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: 1. BATTERY/ASSAULT & BATTERY ON POLICE OFFICER 2. THREATEN TO PERFORM ACT OF VIOLENCE 3. RESISTING AN OFFICER Reported by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Elijah Dale Burton
Sapulpa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with: 1. DRIVING A MOTOR VEHICLE WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE ALCOHOL AGGRAVATED 2. CARRYING A FIREARM WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE 3. OBSTRUCTING AN OFFICER 4. FAILURE TO SIGNAL ON TURNING 5. TRANSPORTING OPEN CONTAINER OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE Reported by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictUnited States of America v. Aaron Chase Sanders
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with possession of more than 220 images of child sexual abuse material. Violation of 8 U.S.C. §2252A(a)(5)(B) and 2252A(b)(2): Possession of Child Pornography. Forfeiture Allegation: 18 U.S.C. §2253: Child Exploitation Forfeiture Reported by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a> Aaron Chase Sanders, 28, of Bixby, Oklahoma, was m
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Lydell Adonis Loins
Sapulpa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: 1. POSSESSION OF FIREARM AFTER FORMER FELONY CONVICTION 2. POSSESSION OF FIREARM DURING COMMISSION OF A FELONY 3. UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DRUG WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE 4. POSSESSION OF CDS WITHOUT TAX STAMP AFFIXED Reported by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Cody Ryan Simpson
Sapulpa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/95965/gene-thompson/" target="_new">Gene Thompson</a> represented the Defendant charged with: 1. DOMESTIC ASSAULT, BATTERY, OR A & B W/A DANGEROUS WEAPON 2. DOMESTIC ASSAULT, BATTERY, OR A & B W/A DANGEROUS WEAPON 3. DOMESTIC ASSAULT AND BATTERY BY STRANGULATION 4. POSSESS FIREARM DURING COMMISSION OF A FELONY Reported by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Mo
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Kanez Zahn Lee Bryant
Supulpa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: 1. BURGLARY IN THE FIRST DEGREE 2. ESCAPE FROM ARREST OR DETENTION 3. RESISTING AN OFFICER 4. OBSTRUCTING OFFICER
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Brandon Lee Benton
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: CF.57.583, FAILURE TO REGISTER AS SEX OFFENDER, FELONY, in violation of 57 O.S. 583, Class: B5
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Wyatt Andre Andrews
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: CF.21.644.D.1, DOMESTIC ASSAULT OR ASSAULT AND BATTERY WITH A DANGEROUS WEAPON, in violation of 21 O.S. 644.D.1, Class: B3 Count # 2. Count as Filed: CF.21.644.D.1, DOMESTIC ASSAULT OR ASSAULT AND BATTERY WITH A DANGEROUS WEAPON, in violation of 21 O.S. 644.D.1, Class: B3 Count # 3. Count as Filed: CF.21.644.G.P2, DOMESTIC ASSAULT AND BATTERY 2ND OFFENSE- IN THE PRESENCE OF MIN
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Koeltn J. Chandler
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: DI1AG, AGGRAVATED DUI ALCOHOL, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902(D) Count # 2. Count as Filed: S41, SPEEDING 41 MPH OR MORE OVER, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-801(B) Count # 3. Count as Filed: WE6, CARRYING A FIREARM WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF DRUGS OR ALCOHOL, in violation of 21 O.S. 1289.9
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Norris Dean Harris, Jr.
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant assault and battery with a dangerous weapon in violation of 21 O.S. 645.
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Aaron David Culwell
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: DI6AM, DUI ALCOHOL - THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT FELONY OFFENSE (MUNICIPAL ARREST), in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902(C)4 Count # 2. Count as Filed: DE1, OPERATING A MOTOR VEHICLE WITHOUT HEAD LAMPS, in violation of 47 O.S. 12-203 Count # 3. Count as Filed: DL1, DRIVING WITH LICENSE CANCELED/SUSPENDED OR REVOKED, in violation of 47 O.S. 6-303(B)
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. L.A.S.
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with domestic assault and battery resulting in great bodily harm in violation of 21 O.S. 644(F). Reported by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. David Forrest Warnock
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: DI6M, DUI DRUGS OR ALCOHOL - SECOND OFFENSE (MUNICIPAL ARREST), in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902A5 Count # 2. Count as Filed: DR3, POSSESSION OF PARAPHERNALIA, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-405 (B)(C) Count # 3. Count as Filed: DU9II, UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DRUG METH, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-402A1 Count # 4. Count as Filed: DL2, DRIVING UNDER SUSPENSION / DUS, in vio
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. L.M.W.
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: DU8TFENT1, TRAFFICKING IN ILLEGAL DRUGS, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-415 (b) Count # 2. Count as Filed: DI7, ACTUAL PHYSICAL CONTROL, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902(A) Count # 3. Count as Filed: DR3, POSSESSION OF PARAPHERNALIA, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-405 (B)(C) Reported by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. C.E.R.
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: ABOFF, AGGRAVATED ASSAULT & BATTERY, in violation of 21 O.S. 646 Reported by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Randy Shoopman and Mikeal Edwin Nelson
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: L7, GRAND LARCENY, in violation of 21 O.S. 1705 Date of Offense: 12/09/2024 Party Name Disposition Information SHOOPMAN, RANDY Disposed: DISMISSED, 03/19/2025. Dismissed- Request of the State Count as Disposed: GRAND LARCENY(L7) Violation of 21 O.S. 1705 NELSON, MIKEAL EDWIN Disposed: DEFERRED, 08/03/2026. Guilty Plea Count as Disposed: GRAND LARCENY(L7) Violation of 21 O
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Adam Joseph Amaro
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: DI6A, DUI ALCOHOL - SECOND OFFENSE, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902(A)(2) Date of Offense: 12/11/2024 Party Name Disposition Information AMARO, ADAM JOSEPH Disposed: DEFERRED, 08/03/2026. Guilty Plea Count as Disposed: DUI ALCOHOL - SECOND OFFENSE(DI6A) Violation of 47 O.S. 11-902(A)(2) Count # 2. Count as Filed: DI5A, TRANSPORTING OPEN CONTAINER - BEER, in violation of 21 O.S
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Wanesha Devon Gifford and Christina Kay McKiddy
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: L7, GRAND LARCENY, in violation of 21 O.S. 1705(CF) Date of Offense: 12/04/2024 Party Name Disposition Information MCKIDDY, CHRISTINA KAY Disposed: CONVICTION, 04/17/2025. Guilty Plea Count as Disposed: GRAND LARCENY(L7) Violation of 21 O.S. 1705(CF) GIFFORD, WANESHA DEVON Disposed: DISMISSED, 08/03/2026. Dismissed- Request of the State Count as Disposed: GRAND LARCENY(L7
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. NGO Nam Mang
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: CHEND, CHILD ENDANGERMENT, in violation of 21 O.S. 852.1 Date of Offense: 11/26/2024 Party Name Disposition Information MANG, NGO NAM Disposed: DEFERRED, 08/03/2026. Guilty Plea Count as Disposed: CHILD ENDANGERMENT(CHEND) Violation of 21 O.S. 852.1 Count # 2. Count as Filed: DI6AM, DUI ALCOHOL - SECOND OFFENSE (MUNICIPAL ARREST), in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902(A2) Date of O
View Verdict>h2> State of Oklahoma v. D.A.T. and C.J.W.
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: OPJ, CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT A FELONY, in violation of 21 O.S. 421 C Count # 2. Count as Filed: RCSP, POSSESSING/RECEIVING/CONCEALING STOLEN PROPERTY, in violation of 21 O.S. 1713(A) Count # 3. Count as Filed: LA4, POSSESSION OF STOLEN VEHICLE, in violation of 47 O.S. 4-103
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Michael Leroy Fisher and Elizabeth Fisher
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: CHN, CHILD NEGLECT, in violation of 21 O.S. 843.5 (C) Date of Offense: 08/01/2023 Party Name Disposition Information FISHER, MICHAEL LEROY Disposed: CONVICTION, 04/21/2025. Nolo Contendere Plea Count as Disposed: CHILD NEGLECT(CHN) Violation of 21 O.S. 843.5 (C) FISHER, ELIZABETH JEAN Disposed: DEFERRED, 08/03/2026. Guilty Plea Count as Disposed: CHILD NEGLECT(CHN) Viol
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. K.A.B.
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of a firearm AFCF in violation of 21 O.S. 1283. Reported by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View Verdict| >> next >> |