Verdict Search Results

State of Oklahoma v. Michael Ray Parsons

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with driving under the influence of alcohol - 2 nd offense, in violation of 47 O.S.. 11-902.A.2.

State of Oklahoma v. Dee Wayne Enloe

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with aggravated DUI alcohol and/or drugs, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902.D, child endangerment (APC/DUI) driver, in violation of 21 O.S. 852.1.A.4, in violation of 47 O.S. 6-303.A.

State of Oklahoma v. Terryk Jamy Petit

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with aggravated DUI alcohol and/or drugs, in violation, in violation of 47 O.S. 11902.D.

State of Oklahoma v. William Roger Dennis

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with driving under the influence of alcohol - 2nd offense, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902.A.2.

State of Oklahoma v. Antonio Marqui Woodfork

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer <a href="CF-2026-2913" target="_new">Glen Graham</a> represented the Defendant charged with unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, in violation of 47 O.S. 4-102, domestic assault and battery , in violation of 21 O.S. 644, and obstructing an officer, in violation of 21 O.S. 540.

State of Oklahoma v. Tevor Lee Thompson

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with first degree burglary, in violation of 21 O.S. 1431.

State of Oklahoma v. Garrison Daniel Overstake

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with identity theft, in violation of 21 O.S. 1533.1, Violation of Oklahoma Computer Crimes Act, in violation of 21 O.S. 1953.A, and obtaining money/property by signature under false pretenses, in violation of 21 O.S. 1542.A.

State of Oklahoma v. Tori Ann Gooding

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with DUI alcohol -2nd offense, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902.A,, operating a vehicle with defective equipment, in violation of 47 O.S. 12-101, and unsafe lane use, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-309.

State of Oklahoma v. Mohmoud Omar

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/30353/robbi-barker/" target="_new">Robbi Barker</a> represented the Defendant charged with feloniously pointing a firearm, in violation of 21 O.S. 1289.16.

State of Oklahoma v. K.A.W.

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with assault with a dangerus weapon -automobile, in violation of 21 O.S. 645, malicious injury to property $1,000 or more, in violation of 21 O.S. 1760.A.2, and failure to carry insurance security verification form, in violation of 47 O.S. 10.107.

State of Oklahoma v. Anthony Robles

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with aggravated DUI alcohol and/or drugs, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-901.D, and operating a motorcycle without a motorcycle endorsement, in violation of 47 O.S. 6-101.

State of Oklahoma v. A.M.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/132200/kent-morlan/" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a> represented the Defendant charged with assai;t and battery with a dangerous weapon, in violation of 21 O.S. 652.C and shooting with intent to kill, in violation of 21 O.S. 652.A.

State of Oklahoma v. Braxton Dyer

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with endangering others while eluding a police officer, in violation of 21 O.S. 540A.B, Class C1, Speeding in excess of the posted zone, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-801.BCF.S36, improperly affixing or covering a license plate, in violation of 47 O.S. 1113.A, failing to carry insurance security verification form, in violation of 47 O.S. 7-606.A.1, reckless driving in violation of 47 O.S. 11-901.AB.P1, failing to pay taxed d

State of Oklahoma v. Lopez Antonioi Medina

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with aggravated DUI Alcohol and /or drug, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902.D,Class B3, driving without a driver's license, in violation of 47 O.S. 6-303.A., and reckless driving, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-901. 47 O.S. 11-902.D provides: D. Any person who is convicted of a violation of driving under the influence while also committing one of more of the following acts: 1. Driving, operating, or being in actual phys

State of Oklahoma v. Kimberly Ann Read

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with driving under the influence of alcohol -2nd offense, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902.C.PM1, B4, which provides: C. 1. Any person who is convicted of a violation of the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor for the first offense and shall: a. participate in an assessment and evaluation pursuant to subsection H of this section and shall follow all recommendations made in the assessment and ev

State of Oklahoma v. Jacob Cecena

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with trafficking amphetamine or methamphetamine 20 grams or more, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-415.C.4.A, possession of controlled substance without a tax stamp affixed, in violation of 68 O.S. 450.9, and trafficking fentanyl 1 gram or more, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-415.c.13.

State of Oklahoma v. Edras Carrento-Rodas

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/66252/carlos-williams/" target="_new">Carlos Williams</a> represented the Defendant charged with aggravated DUI alcohol and/or drugs, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902.D.

State of Oklahoma v. Monroe

Wagoner, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/132200/kent-morlan/" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a> represented the Defendant charged with drug possession, possession of medical marijuana without a license, and driving with license revokes.

State of Oklahoma v. Shell

Claremore, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represents Defendant charged with child abuse, in violation of 21 O.S. 843.5(A), which provides: A. Any person who shall willfully or maliciously engage in child abuse, as defined in this section, shall, upon conviction, be guilty of a Class A3 felony offense punishable by imprisonment in the custody of the Department of Corrections not exceeding life imprisonment, or by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one (1) year, or by a fine of not

State of Oklahoma v. Shell

Claremore, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with child abuse, in violation of 21 O.S. 843.5.

United State of America v. Shell

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with child abuse in Indian County, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1151, 1152, and 13; 21 O.S. 843.5(A):

United States of America v. Shell

Denver, Colorado, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant on appeal from the United States District Court of Oklahoma appealing his conviction for allegedly violently assaulting and throwing his three-month-old son. H.S., to stop him from crying. Because the Appellant is an Indian and the alleged crime occurred in Indian Territory in Oklahoma, federal prosecutors used the Assimilative Crimes Act to charge the Appellant in federal court for violating Oklahoma state law. Appellate

United States of America v. J.T.S.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with assault resulting in serious bodily injury in Indian County, in violation of 18 USC 1151, 1152, 113(a)(6), 21 O.S. 843.5. Defendant allegedly violently assaulted and shook his three-month-old infant son, resulting in severe, long-term physical injuries and developmental delays. Because the victim was Native American and the offense occurred in Indian Country (within Oklahoma), federal jurisdictional statutes appl

State of Oklahoma v. Bradley Wade Thurman

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/57158/glen-graham/" target="_new">Glen Graham</a> represented the Defendant charged with larceny of lost property, in violation of 21 O.S. 1702, and unauthorized use of a credit care, in violation of 21 O.S. 1550.29.

United States of America v. Jald Jensen

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, in violation of 15 U.S.C. 78, and money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1956. Jald Jensen, a former regional sales manager for the dissolved Tulsa company Biz-Jet, in Panama more than a decade after he was charged with bribing a foreign official.

State of Oklahoma v. Deyanira Lizzette Marie Gonzalez

Claremore, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged wiht larceny of merchandise from a retailer, in violation of 21 O.S. 1731.

State of Oklahoma v. Robert Lee Workman

Claremore, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of controlled dangerous substance (methamphetamine), in violation of 63 O.S. 2-402, and unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-405.

State of Oklahoma v. Thomas Patrick Collins

Claremore, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with domestic assault and battery, in violation of 21 O.S. 644, and public intoxication, in violation of 37A O.S. 6-101.

State of oklahoma v. Christina Erlinda Porras

Claremore, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of controlled dangerous substance (Marijuana/Methamphetamine), in violation of 63 O.S. 2-204.

State of Oklahoma v. Stephen Michael Blundstone

Claremore, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with domestic assault and battery, in violation of 21 O.S. 644.

United States of America v. Gleybar Josue Ramirez-Clemente

Washington, DC criminal defense lawyer represented the defendant charged with sexual exploitation of a child, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2251, coercion and enticement, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2422, and possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2252. Gleyber Josue Ramirez-Clemente, age 21, of Frederick, Maryland, sexually exploited a minor victim, who was 15 and 16 years old at the time of the abuse, using his Instagram social media account. Ramirez-Clemente used a fake pers

United States of America v. Chad Allen Haeberle

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with threatening to assault, kidnap or murder a member of Congress, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 115, and cyberstalking, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2261. Chad Allen Haeberle, age 52, threatened to assault, kidnap, and murder United States Representative Josh Brecheen and to knowingly engaging in a course of conduct that caused, attempted to cause, or would be reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional d

State of Oklahoma v. Kenika Skahilia Hicks

Tulsa County, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with second degree burglary, in violation of 21 O.S. 1435, and malicious injury to property in excess of $1,000, in violation of 21 O.S. 1760(A)(2).

State of Oklahoma v. Candice N. Williams

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with embezzlement by employee, in violation of 21 O.S. 1451.

States of Oklahoma v. C.R. E.

Sapulpa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/132200/kent-morlan/" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a> represented the Defendant charged with: 1. MAINTAINING PLACE FOR KEEPING/SELLING CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE 2. UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE 3. UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA

United States of America v. Jimmy Joe Johnson

Muskogee, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with being a felon in possession of ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. 922(g) and 18 U.S.C. 924(a)(8). Jimmy Joe Johnson, age 31, of Stilwell, Oklahoma, was investigate tye the Adair County Sheriff's Office and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives and was found to possess ammunition.

State of Oklahoma v. Donald Lee Hill

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DRUG WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-401-B2; ALTER/REMOVE VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER, in violation of 47 O.S. 1503 B; POSSESSION OF STOLEN VEHICLE, in violation of 47 O.S. 4-103; UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DRUG - METH, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-402.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with robbery with a firearm, in violation of 21 O.S. 801, feloniously pointing a weapon, in violation of 21 O>S. 1289.16 and engaging in a pattern of criminal offenses, in violation of 21 O.S. 425.

State of Oklahoma v. Keiara Tashay Lynette Johnson

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with second degree rape, in violation of 21 O.S. 1114.B.

State of Oklahoma v. B.W.D.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with assault with a dangerous weapon, in violation of 21 O.S. 645.

United States of America v. Melisa Susan Kyle

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. 841. Tulsa County Deputy Sheriff Freddie Alaniz investigates crimes on the highways in and around Tulsa, Oklahoma. He has experience in drug interdiction, has served as a task force officer with the federal Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”), and he is certified by the Oklahoma Council on Law Enforcement Education and Tra

State of Oklahoma v. Robert “Breezy” Lebeau

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with two counts of possession of a firearm after a former felony conviction, in violation of 21 O.S. 1283, aggravated trafficking of fentanyl, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-415, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-402, possession with intent to distribute, possession of a stolen firearm, in violation of 21 O.S. 1283, possession of drug proceeds and possession of drug paraphernalia, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-405. Robert “Breezy” L

State of Oklahoma v. Brock Tyler Spencer

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with driving under the influence of alcohol resulting in great bodily injury, in violation of 48 O.S. 11-904.B.1.

State of Oklahoma v. Trenton Morris

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with domestic assault and battery in the presence of a minor child, second offense, in violation of 21 O.S. 644.G.

State of Oklahoma v. Michael Riksheim

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/93156/jason-edge/" target="_new">Jason Edge</a> represented the Defendant charged with aggravated driving under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902.PM1.

State of Oklahoma v. Raquel Hernandez Franco

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with feloniously pointing a firearm, in violation of 21 O.S. 1289.16, and unlawful possession o of drug paraphernalia, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-405.B.

State of Oklahoma v.T.L.L.

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with feloniously pointing a firearm, in violation of 21 O.S. 1289.16, and possession of a firearm after former conviction of a felony, in violation of 21 O.S. 1383.A.

State of Oklahoma v. A.L. et al.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with engaging in a conspiracy, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-408, use of telecommunication device in a drug transaction, in violation of 13 O.S. 176.3 (8), and aggravated drug trafficking, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-415.

United States of America v. Jesse Lane Mitchell

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with coercing and enticing of a minor at 10 to 12 years old to engage in sexually explicit activity. In August 2024, Collinsville Police responded to a call involving a 12-year-old with multiple red marks on their neck that appeared to be hickeys from an adult male. Officers learned that Mitchell fled the home when he knew police had been contacted and that he had been living with and caring for his girlfriend’s three

George A. Esch, Jr. and Lynda A. Hamlett v. Turner & Company, Inc., et al.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs on a negligence claim. George A. Esch, Jr. and Lynda A. Hamlet sued the developer of their residential subdivision and the entity that sold them their lot, alleging that defective grading and drainage caused water and erosion damage to their property. After Appellants rested at a bench trial, the District Court of Oklahoma County, the Honorable Richard Ogden. Oklahoma's ten-year statute of repose bars untimely cla