Verdict Search Results

State of Oklahoma v. A.J.M. and T.H.F.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: FORG, POSSESSION OF FORGED INSTRUMENTS, in violation of 21 O.S. 1579 J.Z.M. Date of Offense: 10/14/2025 Disposed: CONVICTION, 03/30/2026. Guilty Plea Count as Disposed: POSSESSION OF FORGED INSTRUMENTS(FORG) Violation of 21 O.S. 1579, which provides: A. Every person who has in his or her possession any forged or counterfeited instrument, the forgery of which is hereinbefore

State of Oklahoma v. D.D.W.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/90849/marcus-wright/" target="_new">Marcus Wright</a>represented the Defendant charged with carrying a firearm while under the influence of drugs or alcohol, in violation of 21 O.S. 1989.9, which provides: It shall be unlawful for any person to carry or use shotguns, rifles or pistols in any circumstances while under the influence of beer, intoxicating liquors or any hallucinogenic, or any unlawful or unprescrib

State of Oklahoma v. J.C.L.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/56433/kent-hudson/" target="_new">Kent Hudson</a> represented the Defendant charged with possession of a controlled drug - meth, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-402(B)(C), which provides: A. No person shall use tincture of opium, tincture of opium camphorated, or any derivative thereof, by the hypodermic method, either with or without a medical prescription therefor. B. No person shall use drug paraphernalia to pla

State of Oklahoma v. R.M.C.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with unlawful possession of controlled drug - Meth in violation of 63 O.S. 2-402, which provides: A. 1. It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally to possess a controlled dangerous substance unless such substance was obtained directly, or pursuant to a valid prescription or order from a practitioner, while acting in the course of his or her professional practice, or except as otherwise authorized by

State of Oklahoma v. K.C.J.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with being in actual physical control of a vehicle while intoxicated in violation of 41 O.S. 11-902(A), which provides: A. It is unlawful and punishable as provided for in this section for any person to drive, operate, or be in actual physical control of a motor vehicle within this state, whether upon public roads, highways, streets, turnpikes, other public places or upon any private road, street, alley, or lane which

State of Oklahoma v. K.D.C.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/112784/benjamin-fu/" target="_new">Ben Fu</a> represented the Defendant charged with driving under the influence of alcohol in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902(A)(2:, which provides: A. It is unlawful and punishable as provided for in this section for any person to drive, operate, or be in actual physical control of a motor vehicle within this state, whether upon public roads, highways, streets, turnpikes, other publ

State of Oklahoma v. T.P.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with DUI Alcolhol (Municipal Arrest) in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902(A)(2), which provides: A. It is unlawful and punishable as provided for in this section for any person to drive, operate, or be in actual physical control of a motor vehicle within this state, whether upon public roads, highways, streets, turnpikes, other public places or upon any private road, street, alley, or lane which provides access to one or mor

State of Oklahoma v. K.C.

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/133309/keaton-taylor/" target="_new">Keaton Taylor</a> represented the Defendant charged with larceny of merchandise from a retailer in violation of 21 O.S. 1731.

State of Oklahoma v. Diego Pantoja Guzman

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/57282/michael-french/" target="_new">Micheal French</a> represented the Defendant charged with possession of a firearm while under the supervision of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections in violation of 21 O.S. 1283(C), which provides: C. It shall be unlawful for any person serving a term of probation for any felony in any court of this state or of another state or of the United States or under the jurisdictio

State of Oklahoma v. J.S.R.

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with 3rd Degree Burglary.

State of Oklahoma v. A.M.H.

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with larceny of merchandise from a retailer.

State of Oklahoma v. M.B.M.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with second degree DUI alcohol and attmpted leaving scene of a collision involving property damage.

State of Oklahoma v. Michael Anthony Smith

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of a firearm AFCF in violation of 21 O.S. 1283, which provides: A. Except as provided in subsection B of this section, it shall be unlawful for any person convicted of any felony in any court of this state or of another state or of the United States to have in his or her possession or under his or her immediate control, or in any vehicle which the person is operating, or at the residence where the convi

State of Oklahoma v. S.M.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the defendant charged with buying, selling, transferring, or possessing a motor vehicle or parts with altered vin in violation of 47 O.S. 1503(C), which provides: C. 1. Any person who buys, disposes, sells, transfers, or possesses a motor vehicle or motor vehicle part, with knowledge that the vehicle identification number of the motor vehicle or motor vehicle part has been altered, counterfeited, defaced, destroyed, disguised, falsified, fo

State of Oklahoma v. Ramont Earl Hollis, Jr.

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with robbery with a dangerous weapon in violation of 21 O.S. 801, which provides: Any person or persons who, with the use of any firearms or any other dangerous weapons, whether the firearm is loaded or not, or who uses a blank or imitation firearm capable of raising in the mind of the one threatened with such device a fear that it is a real firearm, attempts to rob or robs any person or persons, or who robs or attempts

United States of America v. Dante Shackleford

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with robbery and attempted robbery which interferes with interstate commerce and carrying and brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence. Dante Shackleford, age 26, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, charged with committing a Hobbs Act robbery, three counts of attempted Hobbs Act robbery, and one count of carrying, using, and brandishing a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence. The defen

United States of America v. John Gregory Garza

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with cyberstalking and two counts of Interstate Communication of Threat to Injure. John Gregory Garza, 25, of Chicago, used more than 18 alias accounts on Facebook to send threatening messages to numerous individuals. Two unrelated victims that lived in Tulsa were identified in Garza’s messaging. Both victims reported the derogatory, hateful, and threatening messages to Facebook and law enforcement. The investigati

State of Oklahoma v. Adrian Wayne Jackson

Muskogee, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer <a href="http://www.kentmorlan.com" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a> represented Adrian Wayne Jackson who was charged with felony murder and possession of a firearm after former conviction of a felony. Adrian Jackson shot and killed Ben Howell during a confrontation between the two in Boynton, Oklahoma on May 8, 2026. Howell went to where Jackson was visiting with two other men to assault and batter him, but Jackson, who was afraid of Howell, retreate

James Charles Childress v. State of Oklahoma

¶1 James Charles Childress was tried by a jury in the District Court of Sequoyah County, Case No. CF 96-292, before the Honorable John C. Garrett, District Judge. Appellant was found guilty of first degree murder (Count 1), in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.1997, § 701.7, and larceny of a domestic animal (Count 2), in violation of 21 O.S.1991, § 1716.1 The jury fixed punishment at ten (10) years' imprisonment on Count 2. After finding the murder was committed for the purpose of avoiding arrest or p

State of Oklahoma v. Jonathan Allen Guernsey

Muskogee, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with DUI felony in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902(A)(2).

State of Oklahoma v. Cody Lee Allen Beers

Muskogee, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with larceny of automobile and domestic abuse.

United States of America v. Angelo Martino

Miami, Florida, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to interfere with interstate commerce by extortion. Angelo Martino, 41, of Land O’Lakes, Florida, collaborated with the operators of the Blackcat/ALPHV (“BlackCat”) ransomware variant used by cybercriminals to attack and extort institutions and companies. Beginning in April 2023, Martino abused his role at a U.S.-based cyber incident response company to assist BlackCat actors. Working as a negotiat

Kenneth Ray Kinchion v. State of Oklahoma

¶1 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Conspiracy to Commit a Felony, Robbery with a Dangerous Weapon (Counts 1 and 3) (21 O.S. 1991, §§ 421 & 801); First Degree Murder (Count 2) (21 O.S. 1991, § 701.7); Robbery with a Dangerous Weapon (Count 4) (21 O.S.Supp.1997, § 801); and Felonious Possession of a Firearm (Counts 5 and 7). ¶2 On November 8, 2000 , Appellant also known as Peanut, DeWayne Shirley also known as Pudgy, and Tero

John William Malaske v. State of Oklahoma

¶1 Appellant, John William Malaske, was tried by jury in the District Court of Kay County, Case Number CF-2001-221, and convicted of Second Degree (Felony) Murder, in violation of 21 O.S.1991, § 701.8 (2). The jury set punishment at ten (10) years imprisonment, and the trial judge sentenced Appellant accordingly. Appellant now appeals his conviction and sentence. * * * ¶4 With respect to propositions one and two, we find the crime of furnishing alcohol to a minor is a felony that i

Eric Jose Barnett v. The State of Oklahoma

¶1 Eric Jose Barnett, Appellant, was tried by jury and found guilty of second degree felony murder, in violation of 21 O.S.2001, § 701.8(2), in the District Court of Okmulgee County, Case No. CF-2009-2.1 The jury sentenced Appellant to twenty-three (23) years imprisonment. The Honorable H. Michael Claver, District Judge, pronounced judgment and sentence accordingly.2 Mr. Barnett appeals the following propositions of error: 1. The trial court's refusal to instruct the jury on Appellant's the

State of Oklahoma v. Faith Nicole Jones

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: CF.21.1731.2.B.1, ORGANIZED RETAIL CRIME, in violation of 21 O.S. 1731.2.B.1 Date of Offense: 02/22/2026 Kyler, Dixon Bradley Disposed: CONVICTION, 04/15/2026. Guilty Plea Count as Disposed: ORGANIZED RETAIL CRIME(CF.21.1731.2.B.1) Violation of 21 O.S. 1731.2.B.1 Jones, Faith Nichole Disposed: CONVICTION, 04/15/2026. Guilty Plea Count as Disposed: AMENDED TO LMFR(CF.21.1731

State of Oklahoma v. B.C.W.

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer Jason Edge represented the Defendant charged with Aggravate DUI alcohol amended to misdemeanor DUI alcohol (municpal arrest) and spending in a posted zone.

State of Oklahoma v. L.H.N.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer Glen Graham represented the Defendant charged with aggravated DUI alcohol or drugs amended to misdemeanor SUI alcohol (municipal arrest).

State of Oklahoma v. Daniel Lafaye Taylor

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: CF.21.644.C, DOMESTIC ASSAULT AND BATTERY - 2ND OFFENSE, in violation of 21 O.S. 644.C, Class: B3 Date of Offense: 01/13/2026 TAYLOR, DANIEL LAFAYE Disposed: DEFERRED, 04/15/2026. Guilty Plea Count as Disposed: DOMESTIC ASSAULT AND BATTERY - 2ND OFFENSE(CF.21.644.C) Violation of 21 O.S. 644.C Count # 2. Count as Filed: CF.21.644.C, DOMESTIC ASSAULT AND BATTERY - 2ND OFFENSE,

State of Oklahoma v. Randy Adam Harris

Muskogee, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: Second Degree Burglary

State of Oklahoma v. Adam Dalaney Blevins

Muskogee, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: DUI Drugs

State of Oklahoma v. William Clayton Holt

Muskogee, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: FAILURE TO REGISTER AS A SEX OFFENDER (FELONY)

State of Oklahoma v. Hugo Vanegas

Muskogee, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the defendant charged with: 1. CHILD ENDANGERMENT BY DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (FELONY) 2. DUI (MISDEMEANOR) 3. DRIVING WITHOUT A VALID DRIVER'S LICENSE (MISDEMENAOR) 4. UNSAFE LANE USE (MISDEMEANOR) 5. TRANSPORTING OPENED CONTAINER OF INTOXICATING BEVERAGE (MISD)

State of Oklahoma v. Kendra Allison Clark and Dennis David Rondon

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: CF.21.1731.A.3, LARCENY OF MERCHANDISE FROM RETAILER - VALUED $1,000 >< $2,500, in violation of 21 O.S. 1731.A, Class: D3 Date of Offense: 02/26/2026 Clark, Kendra Allison Disposed: DEFERRED, 03/24/2026. Guilty Plea Count as Disposed: AMENDED TO MISDEMEANOR LARCENY OF MERCHANDISE FROM RETAILER/WHOLESALER - 1ST AND 2ND OFFENSE(CM.21.1731.A.1) Violation of 21 O.S. 1731.A.1 Rond

State of Oklahoma v. Riley Dale Weir

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: CF.47.11-902.D.P2, AGGRAVATED DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL AND/OR DRUG, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902.D, Class: B3 Date of Offense: 03/04/2026 Party Name Disposition Information WEIR, RILEY DALE Disposed: DEFERRED, 04/07/2026. Nolo Contendere Plea Count as Disposed: AMENDED TO MISDEMEANOR DUI(CM.47.11-902.A.2) Violation of 47 O.S. 11-902 Count # 2. Count as Filed:

State of Oklahoma v. Phillip Douglas Thompson

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: CF.63.2-415,-416.C.12a.P1, TRAFFICKING FENTANYL 1 GRAM OR MORE, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-415.C.13, Class: B1 Date of Offense: 03/12/2026 Party Name Disposition Information THOMPSON, PHILLIP DOUGLAS Disposed: DISMISSED, 04/08/2026. Dismissed- Request of the State Count as Disposed: TRAFFICKING FENTANYL 1 GRAM OR MORE(CF.63.2-415,-416.C.12a.P1) Violation of 63 O.S. 2-415.C.13

State of Oklahoma v. Caroline Lyon

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with aggravated DUI alcolhol and/or drug amended to misdemeanor DUI in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902(A)(2), which provides: A. It is unlawful and punishable as provided in this section for any person to drive, operate, or be in actual physical control of a motor vehicle within this state, whether upon public roads, highways, streets, turnpikes, other public places or upon any private road, street, alley or lane which pro

The States of Oklahoma v. Damien Lee Dominguez

Arapaho, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant accused of violating conditions of probation. Appellant pled guilty to Domestic Assault and Battery by Strangulation, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2014, § 644(J), and was sentenced to a three year deferred sentence. On May 24, 2019, the State filed an Application to Accelerate Deferred Judgment alleging Appellant violated the terms and conditions of his probation by failing to pay probation fees, to complete the Batterer's I

State of Oklahoma v. Brittany Dawn McKelvy

Magnum, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with grand larceny. Brittany Dawn McKelvy pleaded guilty and was sentenced to the Delayed Sentencing Program for Young Adults at the Department of Corrections, Mabel Bassett Correctional Center on a five year deferred sentence. Appellant was placed on supervised probation with the District Attorney's Office for eighteen months. Appellant's rules and conditions of probation required, in part, that she complete a drug

United States of America v. Matthew McLain Veazey

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with wire fraud, money laundering, and aggravated identity theft. From June 2021 through December 2025, MATTHEW MCLAIN VEAZEY, 36, of Oklahoma City, held himself out as an experienced and successful financial investment professional and induced friends and family to send him money by claiming he had special access to favorable investment opportunities due to his connections and prior employment with investment

State of Oklahoma v. Christopher Leiter

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with first-degree murder. Christopher Leiter was accused for shooting and killing an innocent bystander on Admiral and Harvard in Tulsa in May of 2024. The Defendant shot at a buyer of drug who gave him counterfeit money and killed Greg Dumas who was not involved in the drug deal that went wrong.

United States of America v. Demontrae Davion Rogersand Damarion Hiawatha Nichols

State of Oklahoma v. Willaim Isaac Lawrie

Bristow, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: 1. AGGRAVATED TRAFFICKING IN ILLEGAL DRUGS (METH) AFCF in violation of 63 O.S. § 2-415(C), which provides: A. The provisions of the Trafficking in Illegal Drugs Act shall apply to persons convicted of violations with respect to the following substances: 1. Marijuana; 2. Cocaine or coca leaves; 3. Heroin; 4. Amphetamine or methamphetamine; 5. Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD); 6. Phencycli

State of Oklahoma v. Marco Maurice Antonio Young and Dominique Deshawn Jones

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: SWIK, SHOOTING WITH INTENT TO KILL, in violation of 21 O.S. 652 A Date of Offense: 01/18/2025 YOUNG, MARCO MAURICE ANTONIO Disposed: CONVICTION, 03/18/2026. Guilty Plea Count as Disposed: SHOOTING WITH INTENT TO KILL(SWIK) Violation of 21 O.S. 652 A A. Every person who intentionally and wrongfully shoots another with or discharges any kind of firearm, with intent to kill any

State of Oklahoma v. Bryan Franklin Trimble, III

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/85256/michael-manning/" target="_new">Mike Manning</a> represented the Defendant charged with: :Count # 1. Count as Filed: HM11, MURDER - FIRST DEGREE, in violation of 21 O.S. 701.7 Date of Offense: 07/28/2024 TRIMBLE, BRYAN FRANKLIN III Disposed: CONVICTION, 04/06/2026. Nolo Contendere Plea Count as Disposed: MANSLAUGHTER 2ST DEGREE(HM21) Violation of 21 O.S. 711 Count # 2. Count as Filed: OWPN, POS

, State of Oklahoma v. A.D.B.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Violent Crime Offender Act violation of 57 O.S. 599, which provides:Any person required to register pursuant to the provisions of the Mary Rippy Violent Crime Offenders Registration Act who violates any provision of the act shall, upon conviction, be guilty of a Class D1 felony offense and shall be punished by incarceration as provided for in subsections B through F of Section 20N of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statute

State of Oklahoma v. Javier Robles

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charge with assault and battery with a dangerous weapon. Javier Robles stabbed two female members of his family when they attempted to intervene in a dispute between Robles and his brother.

Wesley Darrell Goree v. State of Oklahoma

Ponca City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Counts I and II, Assault and Battery with a Deadly Weapon in violation of 21 O.S.2001, § 652 (C), and Count III, Intentional Discharge of a Weapon into a Dwelling in violation of 21 O.S.2001, § 1289.17A, all after two or more former felony convictions, 7 Dodd v. State, 2004 OK CR 31, 100 P.3d 1017, 1041-42. Goree shot at a house and into a crowd of people, injuring two victims. He relies in part on the Sta

Howard K. Fraizer, et al. v. Bryan Memoiral Hospital Authority, et al.

State of Oklahoma v. Landon Bollenbach

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with attempted theft of copper. Landon Bollenbach, age 29,climbed on a highway signs over the BA Expressway and was in the process of removing wiring when he was arrested.