Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
State of Oklahoma v. R.L.O.
Date: 08-05-0026
Case Number: CM-2028-91
Judge: Sarah L. Bridge
Court: District Court, Lincoln County, Oklahoma
Plaintiff's Attorney: Adam R. Panter
Defendant's Attorney: Kent Morlan
Description:
Chandler, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer Kent Morlan represents the Defendant charged with obstructing an officer in violation of 21 O.S. 540 which provides:
Any person who willfully delays or obstructs any public officer in the discharge or attempt to discharge any duty of his or her office, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this section shall preclude a person from recording the activity of law enforcement in a public area, as long as the recording activity does not delay or obstruct the law enforcement agent in his or her duties.
Any person who willfully delays or obstructs any public officer in the discharge or attempt to discharge any duty of his or her office, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this section shall preclude a person from recording the activity of law enforcement in a public area, as long as the recording activity does not delay or obstruct the law enforcement agent in his or her duties.
Outcome:
A criminal charge is not proof of guilt.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of State of Oklahoma v. R.L.O.?
The outcome was: A criminal charge is not proof of guilt.
Which court heard State of Oklahoma v. R.L.O.?
This case was heard in District Court, Lincoln County, Oklahoma, OK. The presiding judge was Sarah L. Bridge.
Who were the attorneys in State of Oklahoma v. R.L.O.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Adam R. Panter. Defendant's attorney: Kent Morlan.
When was State of Oklahoma v. R.L.O. decided?
This case was decided on August 5, 0026.