New Jersey Copyright infringement Law

State of New Jersey v. Jeremy Arrington

Newark, New Jersey criminal defense lawyer represented the defendant charged with murder. On November 5, 2016, Defendant broke into a Newark apartment after seeing a Facebook post that made negative comments about him. Defendant proceeded to tie up and torture all, and kill some, of the inhabitants, most of whom were children, by stabbing and shooting them. The surviving victims... More...

$0 (12-20-2024 - NJ)

Devona Habiburrahman and Mohammed Habiburrahman v. Dorliea H. Wehye, et al.

Tenton, New Jersey personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories. "New Jersey auto negligence law follows a comparative negligence system, meaning that both parties involved in an accident can be partly responsible for the damages. Here are some key points to understand: Duty of Care: Every driver has... More...

$0 (12-08-2023 - NJ)

Evofem Biosciences, Inc. v. Padagis Israel Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.

Newark, New Jersey intellectual property litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff, who sued the Defendants on patent infringement theories. ... More...

$1 (09-22-2023 - NJ)

Primepoint, LLC v. Primepay, Inc.

Camden, New Jersey intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff and Defendant in a trademark infringement dispute. Primepoint is a New Jersey company with its principal place of business in Bordentown, New Jersey. Primepoint provides payroll processing and payroll tax services using the "Primepoint" trademark (hereinafter the "Primepoint mark"). Primepoint was founded in 2000... More...

$0 (02-29-2008 - NJ)

State of New Jersey v. Donna M. Alessi

<center><h2> Need help finding a lawyer for representation determining whether the police may pull over a driver for questioning in furtherance of an investigation without reasonable suspicion in New Jersey? Call 918-582-6422. It's Free. </h2> </center> We adduce the following facts from the trial record, suppression hearing, <br... More...

$0 (02-04-2020 - NJ)

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe Subscriber Assigned IP Address 96.225-37.182

<center> <h1> <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/recent.asp" target="_new">MoreLaw Helps People Find Lawyers</a> </h1> </center> Trenton, NJ - Strike 3 Holdings, LLC sued John Doe Subscriber Assigned IP Address 96.225-37.182 on a copyright infringement theory.... More...

$0 (12-10-2018 - NJ)

Malibu Media,LLC. v. John Doe Subscriber Assigned IP Address 108.24.45.223

<center> <h1> <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/recent.asp" target="_new">MoreLaw Helps People Find Lawyers</a> </h1> </center> Trenton, NJ - Malibu Media,LLC. sued John Doe Subscriber Assigned IP Address 108.24.45.223 on a copyright infringement theory. ... More...

$0 (12-03-2018 - NJ)

<h3>SSTATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. VIRGIL SUGGS, a/k/a MALIK SUGGS, a/k/a MALIK HINTON, a/k/a VIRGIL L. SUGGS, a/k/a VIRGIL M. SUGGS</h3>

The following facts were elicited during defendant's seven day jury trial. On October 1, 2012, at around 11:28 p.m., two women, Bronique McLeod and S.B., and two men, P.S. and R.P., were going to a club in Irvington.1 S.B. was driving a minivan with McLeod in the front passenger seat, P.S. sitting behind S.B., and R.P. sitting behind McLeod. While stopped at a red ... More...

$0 (09-21-2016 - NJ)

State of New Jersey v. James R. Denelsbeck

In this appeal, we consider whether a defendant is entitled to a jury trial when facing a third or subsequent driving while intoxicated (DWI) charge pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:4-50. This Court previously answered that question in the negative, over twenty-five years ago, in State v. Hamm, 121 N.J. 109, 130 (1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 947, 111 S. Ct. 1413, 113 L. Ed. ... More...

$0 (05-14-2016 - NJ)

Kirk Lory v. Concord Equity Group Advisors, LLC

This action's relevant procedural history is not complex. One month after Loury's nearly two-year employment as a Concord executive ended, he filed a four-count complaint against Concord. Three of the counts were dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The surviving count alleged Concord breached the parties' employment agreement.... More...

$0 (02-26-2016 - NJ)

Joseph Grayzel, M.D. v. Boston Scientific Corp.

This is a contract dispute. Plaintiff Joseph Grayzel, M.D., an interventional cardiologist, is the inventor of a balloon catheter device used for cardiac angioplasty. He holds a patent for that device (the "'629" patent1) and also for variations of his invention that he subsequently created. Dr. Grayzel brought a lawsuit in federal court against defendant Boston Sc... More...

$0 (02-14-2016 - NJ)

P.R.B.A. Corp. v. HMS Host Toll Roads, Inc.

This case requires us to determine whether a private company that operates service plazas on New Jersey highways acted “under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State,” U.S.C. § 1983, when it removed brochures belonging to a “gentleman’s club” from the common areas of its service plazas. We hold that it did not. The absence of any direct involvement ... More...

$0 (12-24-2015 - NJ)

Hanover 3201 Realty LLC v. Village Supermarkets

Hanover 3201 Realty, LLC (“Hanover Realty”) signed a contract with Wegmans to develop a supermarket on its property in Hanover, New Jersey. The agreement required Hanover Realty to secure all necessary governmental permits and approvals prior to breaking ground. Village Supermarkets, Inc. (“ShopRite”) owns the local ShopRite. Once ShopRite and its subsidiary Hanover and Horsehill Devel... More...

$0 (11-13-2015 - NJ)

Brand Marketing Group LLC v. Intertek Testing Services NA

Brand is a small company founded in 2004 by David Brand.1 Until about 2008, Brand sold vent-free heaters— products that provide gas heat without having to vent outdoors—made by a company called ProCom. At that point, Brand began developing the Thermablaster, a vent-free heater that purportedly improved on ProCom’s design. Through some industry contacts, Brand was introduced to a Chine... More...

$0 (09-13-2015 - NJ)

Albert A. Gore v. Al Jazeera America Holdings I, Inc.

Because we are reviewing an order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees and a motion to reconsider that order, the following factual summary is based on the facts as averred by Plaintiff-Appellant Bryan Santini (“Santini”).1 This appeal arises from an altercation between Santini and several members of the New Jersey State Police that took place on February 3, 2009. (Deposi... More...

$0 (08-16-2015 - NJ)

Bryan M. Santini v. Colonel Joseph H. Fuentes

Appellant Bryan M. Santini appeals from two final decisions of the District Court for the District of New Jersey: (1) its September 18, 2013 decision granting summary judgment against him and (2) its May 6, 2014 decision denying his motion seeking reconsideration of the court’s September decision. Santini v. Fuentes, Civ. Act. No. 11-639- JAP, 2013 WL 5554257, at *6 (D.N.... More...

$0 (08-06-2015 - NJ)

Andrew Dwyer v. Cynthia A. Cappell

Attorney Andrew Dwyer, lauded by New Jersey judges in separate judicial opinions, published on his law firm's website those complimentary remarks. One of the judges objected to this, and ultimately the New Jersey Supreme Court adopted an attorney-conduct guideline that bans advertising with quotations from judicial opinions unless the opinions appear in full. Is the guideline an unconstitutional i... More...

$0 (08-11-2014 - NJ)

Peter Brownstein v. Tina Lindsay

This case concerns Appellant Peter Brownstein's claim under the Copyright Act seeking a declaratory judgment of joint authorship of an ethnic identification system that he created with Appellee Tina Lindsay, the Lindsay Cultural Identification Determinate ("LCIDâ€). Lindsay purports to have conveyed the copyrights to the LCID to Appellee Ethnic Technologies ("E-Techâ€). The contested wor... More...

$0 (01-29-2014 - NJ)

Ryan Hart v. Electronic Arts, Inc.

In 2009, Appellant Ryan Hart ("Appellantâ€ or "Hartâ€)1 brought suit against Appellee Electronic Arts, Inc. ("Appelleeâ€ or "EAâ€) for allegedly violating his right of publicity as recognized under New Jersey law. Specifically, Appellant"s claims stemmed from Appellee"s alleged use of his likeness and biographical information in its NCAA Football series of videogames. The Distr... More...

$0 (05-21-2013 - nj)

Gary Smith v. Jersey Central Power & Light Company

This is an unusual case involving a nuisance claim based on "neutral-to-earth voltage" (NEV), also called "stray voltage" or "stray current," passing along the ground of a residential property. Plaintiffs, Gary and Eileen Smith, husband and wife, sued defendant, Jersey Central Power & Light Company, because high NEV levels from its electrical distribution system gave them shocks in their backyard.... More...

$0 (08-10-2011 - NJ)

Sanofi-Aventis SA and Abbott Laboratories v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Sanofi-Aventis SA and Abbott Laboratories sued Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. on a patent infringement theory claiming that Glemark infringed Abbott's patent on its hypertension medicine Tarka. Glenmark challenged the validity of a Sanofi patent that expires in February 2015. Glenmark also claimed that argued t the patent covered an invention that was protected by an expired patent. ... More...

$16000000 (01-14-2011 - NJ)

Vonnie Cornett v. Johnson & Johnson and Cordis Corp.

At issue in these consolidated appeals is whether State causes of action in strict product liability, breach of express and implied warranty, and derivative claims for alleged defects in a medical device, the CypherÂ® Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent (Cypher or device), manufactured by defendant Cordis Corporation (Cordis or defendant) are preempted by the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 ... More...

$0 (07-23-2010 - NJ)

Carl J. Mayer v. Bill Belichick; The New England Patriots; National Football League

Plaintiff Carl J. Mayer appeals from the order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granting the respective motions to dismiss filed by Defendants Bill Belichick and the New England Patriots ("Patriotsâ€) as well as by Defendant National Football League ("NFLâ€). We will affirm. I. This highly unusual case was filed by a disappointed football f... More...

$0 (05-27-2010 - NJ)

Sanofi-Aventis, U.S., L.L.C. v. Sandoz, Inc.

Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi-Aventis, and Debiopharm S.A. (collectively, Sanofi) appeal from the district court's grant of summary judgment of noninfringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,338,874 (the '874 patent). Because the district court erred in construing composition claims as product-by-process claims, we vacate and remand. BACKGROUND This case is on appeal from a Hatch-Waxman infr... More...

$0 (09-10-2009 - NJ)

Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries, Ltd., et al.

This case is a patent law appeal from a district court order granting summary judgment of invalidity based on anticipation and obviousness. Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical ("Orthoâ€) brought suit against Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries ("Tevaâ€) and Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories ("Caracoâ€) alleging infringement of U.S. Reissued Patent 39,221 ("RE'221â€), directed to a combina... More...

$0 (08-26-2009 - NJ)

PB Brands, LLC d/b/a Patel Brothers v. Patel Shah Indian Grocery PB Brands, LLC

PB Brands, LLC ("PB Brandsâ€) appeals the District Court's order denying its motion for a preliminary injunction. PB Brands sought to enjoin Patel Shah Indian Groceries ("PSIGâ€)1 from using the name Patel, or any similar name, in commerce. The District Court held that PB Brands failed to establish that a likelihood of confusion existed between PB Brands' service marks and PSIG's busines... More...

$0 (06-10-2009 - NJ)

Merck & Co., Inc. v. Apotex, Inc. and Apotex Corporation

Appellants Apotex, Inc. and Apotex Corporation appeal from the final judgment of dismissal of their counterclaims for declaratory judgment against appellee Merck & Co., Inc. Because we find that the current dispute does not "'admi[t] of specific relief through a decree of a conclusive character, as distinguished from an opinion advising what the law would be upon a hypothetical state of facts,'â�... More...

$0 (08-21-2008 - NJ)

<a href="http://www.fedcir.gov/opinions/06-1572.pdf" target="_new">IN RE GABAPENTIN PATENT LITIGATION</a>

Warner Lambert Co., Pfizer Inc., and Gödecke Aktiengesellschaft (collectively "Warner Lambert") appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granting summary judgment of noninfringement of claims 7-11 of U.S. Patent 6,054,482 ("the '482 patent") in favor of appellees Purepac Pharmaceutical Co., Faulding Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.... More...

$0 (09-21-2007 - NJ)

<a href="http://fedcir.gov/opinions/07-1092.pdf" target="_new">Cybersettle, Inc. v. National Arbitration Forum, Inc.</a>

In this patent infringement case, online dispute resolution company Cybersettle, Inc., sued National Arbitration Forum, Inc., ("NAF"), claiming that the operation of two of NAF's online dispute resolution systems infringed certain method claims of Cybersettle's U.S. Patent No. 6,330,551 B1 ("the '551 patent"). On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court construed the asserted clai... More...

$0 (07-27-2007 - NJ)

Mosaid Technologies Inc. v. Samsung Electronics, Inc.

Patent infringement claim by Canadia company Mosaid Technologies against Samsung Electronics relating to patents for dynamic random access memory technology issued to Mosaid. ... More...

$566840 (09-03-2004 - NJ)

<a href="http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/031286p.pdf" target="_new">Houbigant, Inc., Establissement Houbigant v. Federal Insurance Company; Fireman's Fund Insurance Companies</a>

Houbigant, Inc. and Establissment Houbigant (collectively, "Houbigant") appeal the district court's order granting Federal Insurance Company's ("Federal") motion for summary judgment and denying Houbigant's cross motion for summary judgment.1 For the reasons discussed below, we will reverse the judgment of the district court and remand for further proceedings consistent with this op... More...

$0 (07-08-2004 - NJ)

<a href="http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/023647.pdf" target="_new">Shire US, Inc. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.</a>

This matter comes on before this court on appeal from an order entered August 27, 2002, denying appellant Shire U.S. Inc.'s ("Shire") application for a preliminary injunction in its case against Barr Laboratories, Inc. ("Barr") charging Barr with trade dress infringement and trade dress dilution under sections 43(a) and (c) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1125(a) and (c), and state unfa... More...

$0 (05-28-2003 - NJ)

Atlantic Recording, et al. v. Daniel Peng

Copyright infringement claims by Atlantic Recording, Arista Records, Inc., BMG Music, Capitol Records, Inc., Elektra Entertainment Group, Inc., Fonovisa, Inc., Interscope Records, Lava Records, LLC, London-Sire Records, Inc., Loud Records, LLC, Maverick Recording Company, Motown Record Company, LP, Sony Music Entertainment, UMG Recording, Inc., Virgin Records of America, Inc., Warner Bros Recor... More...

$12000 (05-02-2003 - NJ)

<a href="http://www.ll.georgetown.edu/federal/judicial/fed/opinions/02opinions/02-1195.html" target="_new">Bio-Technology General Corporation v. Duramed Pharmaceutical, Inc.</a>

The late Dr. Samuel Pasquale invented a contraceptive regimen in which a woman takes small doses of unopposed estrogen during a portion of the initial phase of her menstrual cycle, i.e., beginning a few days after the onset of menses, and daily doses of progestin for the remainder of the cycle. The small amounts of estrogen taken during the initial phase are believed to prevent an egg from bec... More...

$0 (04-03-2003 - NJ)

<a href="http://www.ll.georgetown.edu/federal/judicial/fed/opinions/02opinions/02-1026.html" target="_new">Boehrigter Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc. v. Schering-Plough Corporation and Schering Corporation</a>

Schering-Plough Corporation and Schering Corporation ("Schering") appeal the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, finding United States Patent No. 5,476,778 ("'778 patent") infringed and not invalid. Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc. ("Boehringer"), the assignee of the '778 patent, cross-appeals based on the district court's claim construction. We find ... More...

$0 (02-21-2003 - NJ)

<a href="http://lawlibrary.rutgers.edu/courts/appellate/a6339-00.opn.html" target="_new">American Home Mortgage Corporation v. American Home Mortgage Corporation</a>

Plaintiff, American Home Mortgage Corporation, commenced this action in August 1999 by order to show cause and verified complaint seeking permanent injunctive relief against defendant, American Home Mortgage of New York asserting claims of unfair competition and tradename infringement.See footnote 11 Pursuant to the direction of the court, counsel for the parties prepared a joint stipulation of fa... More...

$0 (02-06-2003 - NJ)

Juji Photo Film Co. v. Jazz Photo Corp.

Patent infringement claim by Fuji Photo Film Corporation against Jazz Photo Corporation relating to the recycling single use cameras manufactured and sold by Fuji and Kodak. The disposable cameras were sent to China by Jazz where they were reloaded with film, glued back togther and sold to the public at a price below Fuji. Plaintiff's goal is to force defendant out of the business of recycling d... More...

$25000000 (12-05-2002 - NJ)

<a href="http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinions/002772.pdf" target="_new">Dun & Bradstreet Software Services, Inc., et al. v. Grace Consulting, Inc., et al.</a>

This appeal presents serious problems of alleged copyright infringement in an evolving and highly competitive world of computer technology that challenges the effectiveness of our well-established copyright laws. Formerly known as Dun & Bradstreet Software Services, Inc. (DBS), Geac Computer Systems, Inc. (collectively Geac) is the undisputed owner of certain proprietary, copyrig... More...

$0 (09-25-2002 - NJ)

<a href="http://lawlibrary.rutgers.edu/courts/appellate/a3017-00.opn.html" target="_new">Michael Joye, et al. v. Hunterdon Central Regional High School Board of Education, et al.</a>

Defendants, Hunterdon Central Regional High School ("Hunterdon Central") and its Acting Superintendent of Schools, Judith Gray, appeal from a judgment entered on January 29, 2001, declaring the policy concerning drug and alcohol testing of students at Hunterdon Central in violation of the New Jersey Constitution and enjoining defendants from implementing what the parties both call "random" substa... More...

$0 (08-16-2002 - NJ)

<a href="http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinions/014422.pdf" target="_new">Dam Things of Denmark a/k/a Troll Company Aps v. Russ Berrie & Company, Inc.</a>

We consider this case on an expedited appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The parties to this appeal, Dam Things from Denmark, a/k/a Troll Company ApS (together "Dam Things"), and Russ Berrie and Company, Inc. ("Russ"), are purveyors of trolls -- short, pudgy, plastic dolls with big grins and wild hair. Dam Things, a Danish company, assert... More...

$0 (05-14-2002 - NJ)