Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Juji Photo Film Co. v. Jazz Photo Corp.
Date: 12-05-2002
Case Number: 99-CV-2937
Judge: Faith S. Hochberg
Court: United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
Plaintiff's Attorney: Robert J. Rohrberger of Fox & Fox, Livingston, New Jersey
Defendant's Attorney: Jeffery I. Kaplan of Kaplan & Gilman, Woodbridge, New Jersey
Fuji and the Eastman Kodak Film Co., which licenses the single-use technology from Fuji, both recycle the cameras by melting down and remolding the plastic cases. The cases are collected from film labs by middlemen, who sell them to Fuji, Kodak or Jazz, which does not melt them, but merely reloads and relabels them, and sells them for less than the two big film companies.
About This Case
What was the outcome of Juji Photo Film Co. v. Jazz Photo Corp.?
The outcome was: Plaintiff's verdict for $25 million.
Which court heard Juji Photo Film Co. v. Jazz Photo Corp.?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, NJ. The presiding judge was Faith S. Hochberg.
Who were the attorneys in Juji Photo Film Co. v. Jazz Photo Corp.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Robert J. Rohrberger of Fox & Fox, Livingston, New Jersey. Defendant's attorney: Jeffery I. Kaplan of Kaplan & Gilman, Woodbridge, New Jersey.
When was Juji Photo Film Co. v. Jazz Photo Corp. decided?
This case was decided on December 5, 2002.