|
Marjo Alberto Lopez Garza v. Citigroup, Inc.
District of Delaware Federal Courthouse - Wilmington, Deleware |
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(d), a district court may order a plaintiff who voluntarily dismisses an action |
In Re: Trump Entertainment Resorts |
The facts giving rise to this appeal are undisputed. The Debtors own and operate the Trump Taj Mahal casino in Atlantic City, New Jersey. The casino employs 2,953 employees, 1,467 of whom are unionized. UNITE HERE Local 54 is the largest of the employee unions, representing 1,136 employees. The most recent CBA between the Union and Taj Mahal was negotiated in 2011 for a three-year term. It co... More... $0 (04-03-2016 - DE) |
Marino v. Patriot Rail Company LLC |
The facts are drawn from the affidavits and supporting documents that the parties |
ESG Capital Partners II, LP, et al. v. Passport Special Opportunities Master Fund, LP, et al. |
Non-party Timothy Burns formed ESG Capital Partners II, LP (the ―Partnership‖) |
Pipal Tech Ventures Private Limited v. MoEngage, Inc. |
Plaintiff Pipal Tech is a closely-held corporation formed in 2011 under the laws of India with its principal place of business in India.4 Pipal Tech is in the business of developing, licensing, and supporting mobile and web-based applications. Non-parties Amit Baid, Raviteja Dodda, and Yashwanth Kumar are the founders of Pipal Tech.6 Dodda and Kumar are also former executives and board The fact... More... $0 (12-19-2015 - DE) |
Gerald A. Lechliter v. Del. Department of Natural Resources, et al. |
The Plaintiff here, Colonel Gerald A. Lechliter, is a resident of Lewes. His |
Aaron Houseman and Nancy Houseman v. Eric S. Sagerman, et al. |
In 1996, Nancy Houseman and her husband Aaron Houseman (together the |
Doberstein v. G-P Industries, Inc. |
Plaintiff, Anne L. Doberstein, is an individual who primarily works and resides in |
Ernesto Espinoza v. Mark Zuckerberg, et al |
This case presents a question of first impression: Can a disinterested controlling |
In re Genelux Corporation |
Plaintiff Genelux Corporation (the ―Company‖) is a privately held, clinical stage |
Eitan Konstantino v. AngioScore, Inc., et al. |
Plaintiff Dr. Eitan Konstantino was one of the founders of Angioscore. |
Lieberman v. Electrolytic Ozone, Inc. |
In a prior decision issued May 29, 2013, Israel Discount Bank of New York v. First |
Israel Discount Bank of New York v. Higgins, et al. |
In a prior decision issued May 29, 2013, Israel Discount Bank of New York v. First |
Fox v. CDX Holdings, Inc. |
Caris Life Sciences, Inc. (―Caris‖ or the ―Company‖) was a privately held |
American Mining Corporation v. Michael Theriault |
This is an appeal from a post-trial decision and final judgment of the Court of Chancery awarding more than $2 billion in damages and more than $304 million in attorneys’ fees. The Court of Chancery held that the defendants-appellants, Americas Mining Corporation (“AMC”), the subsidiary of Southern Copper Corporation’s (“Southern Peru”) controlling shareholder, and affiliate directors ... More... $0 (08-29-2012 - DE) |
A.W. Financial Services, S.A. v. Empire Resources, Inc., et al. |
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (The Honorable Sidney H. Stein) (the “Southern District”) has certified to us, under Article IV, § 11(8) of the Delaware Constitution and Rule 41 of this Court,1 four questions relating to Delaware’s Escheat Statute. Those questions arose in a pending action in the Southern District brought by plaintiff, A.W. Financial S... More... $0 (09-15-2009 - DE) |
Joyce O'Neal, etc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al. |
Joyce O’Neal, as Administrator of the Estate of Elizabeth Reader, appeals from a Superior Court order granting State Farm’s motion for summary judgment. After drinking several beers and smoking crack cocaine, Reader embarked on a personal errand in a van owned by her employer and insured by State Farm. Around midnight on July 10, 2006, she pulled that van onto the shoulder of I-495. For reason... More... $0 (07-23-2009 - DE) |
Mark Levy v. Sterling Holding Company, LLC; National Semiconductor Corporation; Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. |
Mark Levy filed a shareholder derivative suit on behalf of Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. (“Fairchild”) against Sterling Holding Company, LLC (“Sterling”) and National Semiconductor Corporation (“National”) for disgorgement of short-swing profits, pursuant to section 16(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934. National and Sterling contend that two separate SEC Rules, 16b-3 and 16b... More... $0 (10-01-2008 - DE) |
Larry Morrison v. Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, III, L.P., et al. |
Larry Morrison, a shareholder of XM Satellite Radio Holdings, Inc. ("XM"), brought a derivative suit under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78p(b), to recover alleged short-swing profits realized by corporate insiders Madison Dearborn Capital Partners III, L.P, Madison Dearborn Special Equity III, L.P., Madison Dearborn Partners III, L.P., and Madison Dear... More... $0 (10-17-2006 - DE) |
Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. |
Power Integrations (OTC: POWI), the leader in high-voltage analog integrated circuits for power conversion, today announced that it has won a verdict in its patent-infringement lawsuit against Fairchild Semiconductor. A jury found that Fairchild has willfully infringed all four Power Integrations patents asserted in the case, and has awarded Power Integrations damages of approximately $34 milli... More... $34000000 (10-11-2006 - DE) |
Alex Tse, et al. v. Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., et al. |
The plaintiffs, former shareholders of Biotek Solutions, Inc., ("Biotek"), appeal the District Court's order granting summary judgment for the defendants, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. ("Ventana"), and Jack Schuler and John Patience, two of Ventana's officers, in this securities action brought pursuant to S 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. S 78j(b), S.E.C. ... More... $0 (07-12-2002 - DE) |
W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn. v. Intercat, Inc. and Conoco, Inc. |
Patent Infringement - W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn. owned five patents relating to a composition, or the use of a composition, to reduce sulfur oxide emissions from hydrocarbon conversion processes. From these patents, Grace produced a product called DESOX which attained a 95% market share for sulfor oxide reduction processes. Grace sued for patent infrinegment when defendant, Intercat, Inc., introduce... More... $15966572 (08-09-1999 - DE) |