|
|
|
|
Wilmington, Delaware criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with sexual assault. |
|
Alicia A. Cohen v. Ronald A. Cohen |
|
Wilmington, Delaware personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the defendant claiming sexual abuse. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defendants with Ties to White Supremacy Sentenced in Connection with Plot to Destroy Energy Facilities Three men were senten... More... $0 (07-25-2024 - DE) |
|
|
|
Philadelphia Man Sentenced to 10 Years for Illegally Possessing a Firearm; Gun was Used in Violent Assault and Armed Robbery |
|
|
|
A Texas man was sentenced on March 21, 2024, after he pleaded ... More... $0 (03-22-2024 - DE) |
|
|
|
Wilmington, DE: On January 15, 1980, a 15-year-old girl reported she had been raped along the railroad tracks in Wilmington, Delaware. |
|
|
|
Wilmington, Delaware criminal defense attorney represented defendant charged with selling controlled substances in violation of 18 U.S.C. §841 |
|
James R. Adams v. Governor of Delaware |
|
![]() James R. Adams is a resident and member of the State Bar of Delaware. For some time, he has expressed a desire to be considered for a judicial position in that state. Following the announcement of several judicial vacancies, Adams considered applying but ultimately chose not to... More... $0 (04-10-2019 - DE) |
|
James R. Adams v. Governor of Delaware |
|
![]() James R. Adams is a resident and member of the State Bar of Delaware. For some time, he has expressed a desire to be considered for a judicial position in that state. Following the announcement of several judicial vacancies, Adams considered applying but ultimately chose not to beca... More... $0 (02-06-2019 - DE) |
|
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AMY GONZALEZUNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAVID MATUSIEWICZ
918-960-5038 |
|
David Matusiewicz1 and Christine Belford were married from 2001 to 2006, during which time they had three children, L.M.1, L.M.2, and K.M.1 (the children). The couple and their children also lived with Belfords one child from a previous marriage, K.M.2.2 After their divorce, Belford and David engaged in a bitter custody dispute, during which David accused Belford of being an unfit mother and ... More... $0 (09-09-2018 - DE) |
|
State of Delaware v. Oneill Rose | |
Presently before the court is Defendants motion for post |
|
Franks v. State Of Delaware | |
In 1992 Jermaine Wright was convicted of Murder in the First Degree, Robbery |
|
State of Delaware v. Turner | |
The issues before the Court involve Defendants Motion to Suppress evidence |
|
Jones v. State Of Delaware | |
Kyran Jones appeals from his October 10, 2014 Superior Court |
|
State of Delaware v. Atkinson | |
This 23rd day of October, 2015, upon consideration of Defendants Motion for Postconviction Relief, it appears to the Court that: |
|
Trinity Wall Street v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | |
[T]he secret of successful retailing is to give your |
|
United States of America v. Charles Jobe | |
WILMINGTON, Del. – Charles Jobe, 54, of Marcus Hook, Pennsylvania, pleaded guilty today to one count of assault on a federal officer, a misdemeanor in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 111(a), announced Charles M. Oberly, III, United States Attorney for the District of Delaware. |
|
United States of America v. Michael J. Barndt | |
Michael J. Barndt, a/k/a “mikecoach73,” age 40, of Sellersville, Pennsylvania, was sentenced to 10 years in federal prison for Attempted Coercion and Enticement of a Minor, in violation of federal law. Barndt also was sentenced to five years of supervised release following his prison sentence. He also will be required to register as a sex offender in any jurisdiction in which he lives, works... More... $0 (02-25-2014 - DE) |
|
Brian Elliott v. Marist Brothers of the Schools Inc. et al | |
Brian Elliott, age 44, sued the Marist Brothers of the Schools Inc., Church of the Nativity of Our Blessed Lady, Archdiocese of New York and Brother Damian Galligan on a sexual abuse (civil assault and battery) and negligence theories claiming that he was sexually abused by the priest starting in 1977 and ending in 1985. He claimed that the defendant abused him in at least four states on various ... More... $2400000 (11-19-2013 - DE) |
|
Courtland C. Pitts v. State of Delaware | |
It is only on rare instances that a jury‟s verdict in a civil case should be overturned. This appeal presents the question whether this is such a case. Courtland Pitts filed a Complaint against Corporal Gregory Spence of the Delaware State Police, asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law. After a trial, a jury found in favor of Pitts on two of his four claims. The District Court gr... More... $0 (06-17-2011 - DE) |
|
Nelson Lora-Pena v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, et al. | |
This is an appeal from the District Court's dismissal of Nelson Lora-Pena's civil complaint. For the following reasons, we will vacate the District Court's order and remand the case for further proceedings. On July 20, 2006, Appellant, an inmate at United States Penitentiary-Canaan, initiated a pro se civil action against a Pennsylvania state trooper, various U.S. Marshals, the U.S. ... More... $0 (06-24-2008 - DE) |
|
State of Delaware v. Vincent Cox | |
Criminal Law - Felony: The defendant-appellee, Vincent Cox, was acquitted, following a jury trial in the Superior Court. The State has applied for leave to appeal, pursuant to Del. Code Ann. tit. 10, 9903, from an adverse ruling by the Superior Court that was made during the course of Cox's criminal trial. The purpose of section 9903 "is to afford to the State the opportunity to have review... More... $0 (12-23-2003 - DE) |
|
William J. Hawkins v. State of Delaware | |
(1) The appellant, William J. Hawkins, has appealed from the Superior Court's denial of his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Superior Court Criminal Rule 61. The State of Delaware has moved to affirm the judgment of the Superior Court on the ground that it is manifest on the face of Hawkins' opening brief that the appeal is without merit. We agree and affirm. 1Hawkins v. State,... More... $0 (12-10-2003 - DE) |
|
Dorothy Carrigan v. Peter Davis | |
Sexual Assault - Constitutional Rights - In this action plaintiff alleges that defendant violated her Fourth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights and acted with gross and wanton negligence, when he sexually assaulted her while she was incarcerated. Defendant admits that he engaged in a sexual act with the plaintiff, but defendant contends that the plaintiff consented to the act. Plaintiff'... More... $0 (09-28-1999 - DE) |