If you need a Workmans Comp Attorney in Ohio, call at 888-354-4529.

Attorney defendant Peter J. Porter represented plaintiff Elise Sharon in a
lawsuit resulting in a 2008 default judgment entered in favor of Sharon. In October 2015,
a judgment debtor wrote to Sharon, claiming the judgment was void. In November 2015,
Sharon’s new attorney correctly opined that the judgment was indeed void. In September
2016, the debtor filed a motion to vacate the j

I. Facts
A. Legal representation
Nahid Lahiji (Nahid)2 retained attorney Alexander Cohen
(Cohen) and his law firm Abir Cohen Treyzon Salo, LLP (the
firm) in June 2017 to represent her in a dispute with the insurer
of her home. Nahid obtained some preliminary recovery, and
authorized the firm to retain $120,000 of that recovery. She
nevertheless became dissatisfied with

If you need a Personal Injury Attorney in Ohio, call at 888-354-4529.

¶1 Appellants seek review of the Trial Court's order granting summary judgment to Appellees on Appellants' counter-claim for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress, arising from alleged abuse of discovery process. Appellees Boring and Kahlor, former county commissioners, brought suit against Plaintiff Big Five Community Services (Big Five) in Pontotoc District Court

¶1 The dispositive issue presented for review in this abuse of process action filed by the counterclaimants is whether the third-party plaintiff's challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence should have been sustained and a verdict directed for the third-party plaintiff.

¶2 We answer in the affirmative and reverse the judgment appealed.

I

¶3 Underlying the lawsuit - ini

¶1 The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit [certifying court] certified the following questions pursuant to the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 O.S. 1991 ' ' 1601 et seq.:

1. In light of the facts as detailed below that the Defendants Laurance B. Wolfberg and Carolyn Wolfberg either individually or combined instituted four separate lawsuits and filed one

Super. Ct. No. CIVMSC 17-02059)
Eric Meyers and Westpro Realty, Inc. (the attorney defendants) appeal from an
order denying their special motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP law. (Code Civ. Proc.,
§ 425.16.)1
They contend the claims asserted against them for wrongful eviction, misuse
of a security deposit (Civ. Code, § 1950.5, subd. (b)(1)), breach of the covenant of quiet