Plaintiff and appellant Dolores Tarin (Dolores) appeals
from the judgment after the trial court granted three judgments
on the pleadings in favor of defendants and respondents Rochelle
Lind (Rochelle) and Jesse Tarin (Jesse)1 (collectively,
defendants), and Dolores dismissed her remaining claims.
Dolores alleged that defendants interfered in Dolores’s
relationship with her

¶1 The Complainant, State of Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association (Complainant), began proceedings pursuant to Rule 6, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (RGDP) 5 O.S. 2011, ch. 1, app. 1-A alleging three counts of professional misconduct against the Respondent, Laurie Jean Miller (Respondent). The Respondent is an active member of the Oklahoma Bar Association and is currently in good s

After respondent Victrola 89, LLC (Victrola) purchased
a house (the Property) from appellant Jaman Properties 8,
LLC (JP8), Victrola filed suit against JP8, appellant Jaman
Properties, Inc. (JP), and their principal, appellant Michael
Manheim (collectively, the Jaman Parties), among others,
regarding allegedly undisclosed and unrepaired defects in
the Property. Based on the

After respondent Victrola 89, LLC (Victrola) purchased
a house (the Property) from appellant Jaman Properties 8,
LLC (JP8), Victrola filed suit against JP8, appellant Jaman
Properties, Inc. (JP), and their principal, appellant Michael
Manheim (collectively, the Jaman Parties), among others,
regarding allegedly undisclosed and unrepaired defects in
the Property. Based on the

Boston, MA - Boston, Massachusetts personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, Caitlin Mallett, who sued the United States of America on a Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theory.

Springfield, MA - Khalid Adbur-Rahman sued the United States of America on a Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theory claiming $9,999,000 in damages.

A jury found that a hospital and medical group created a
hostile work environment and wrongfully discharged three
nurses based on their opposition to a supervisor’s harassment,
using a pretext that the nurses had abused a patient. The nurses
soon found new jobs, but a year later lost them when the State of
California filed criminal charges against them for the patient
abuse

Columbus, OH - Jeffrey W. Hutson and Donnal Cullman sued the United States of America on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming $489,000 in damages and injuries as a direct result of a car wreck caused by Patrick Larosa wiled acting within the scope and course of his employment with the United States Postal Service.

Mr. Anthony Chu is the defendant lawyer in this malicious
prosecution case. Mr. Qingyu Zhang sued lawyer Chu because
Chu had added Zhang as a defendant in an earlier and
underlying lawsuit. Chu dismissed Zhang from that underlying
case without prejudice, which prompted Zhang to sue Chu for
malicious prosecution, which prompted Chu to file a special
motion to strike Zhang’s

Defendant Benjamin J. Remington, M.D., appeals the trial court’s grant of a
motion for a new trial. On April 22, 2013, plaintiff Judith Brewer underwent carpal
tunnel surgery and shoulder surgery performed by Drs. Pistel and Bedi. Early the next
morning, she became paralyzed and sought emergency treatment. Remington performed
a spinal decompression surgery on Judith on May 30, 2013

Richmond, VA - Sylvia D Henderson sued United States of America on a Federal Tort Claims Act on auto negligence and personal injury theories claiming to have been injured and/or damaged in a car wreck.

This is the fourth appeal in this longstanding lawsuit, and
challenges a $7 million default judgment entered after the trial
court issued terminating sanctions. Among the many issues
raised by the parties on appeal, three present significant legal
questions: (1) May a trial court issue terminating sanctions when
the discovery a party contumaciously refuses to provide
encomp

Muskogee, OK - Wayne Sheppard and Bonita Sheppard sued the United States of America on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence personal injury theory claiming $500,000 in injures and/or damages in a car wreck caused by a federal government employee.

Tulsa, OK - Katie Pardue v. Emergency Medical Services Authority, d/b/a EMSA on a governmental tort claims act personal injury auto negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damaged in a car wreck that occurred on December 23, 2016 caused by an EMSA employee driving an EMSA ambulance.