Phoenix, Arizona personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theory.

Oakland, California personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Proposition 65 violation theory.

Under legislation enacted as Proposition 65 in 1986, businesses are
prohibited from knowingly and intentionally exposing any individual to
certain chemicals without first providing a warning. Lee seeks to hold
Amazon.com, Inc. (Amazon) accountable for off

Sacramento, California personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant United States of America on a Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theory.

Phoenix, Arizona personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued the United States on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damaged in a motor vehicle accident caused by a government employee.

Great Falls, Montana personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued the United States of America on a Government Tort Claim Act medical malpractice wrongful death theory claiming that Granville Stuart Abbott died as a direct result of substandard care.

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act medical malpractice negligence theory claiming to have suffered injuries and/or damages as a direct result of substandard medical care provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Orlando, Florida personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff on a Federal Tort Claims Act medical malpractice negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damaged as a direct result of substandard medical care.

Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury car wreck lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $400,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by a federal government employee.

San Diego, California personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by a federal government employee.

The Federal Tort Claims Act:

Those who litigate claims under the Federal Tort Claim

Tacoma, Washington personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theories claiming to have been injured and/or damaged in a train wreck.

Emily Torjusen, age 20, was a passenger on the Amtrak Cascade 501 when it derailed.

See: Seattle Times

West Paul Beach, Florida personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence negligence theory claiming to have to have been injured and/or damaged in a motor vehicle accident caused by a government employee.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claim Act medical malpractice negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damaged as a direct result of substandard medical care.

Houston, Texas personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant United States of America on a Federal Tort Claims Act medical malpractice theory claiming to have been injured and/or damages as a direct result of substandard medical care.

New York, New York personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant United States of America on a Federal Tort Claims Act medical malpractice theory claiming to have suffered more than $4 million in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of substandard medical care.

Fort Lauderdale, Florida personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant United States of America on a Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C. 2271) auto negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damages in a car wreck caused by a federal government employee.

¶1 Defendants/Counter-Claimants/Appellants/Counter-Appellees James H. and Jamie Wesson appeal from judgment finding Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants/Appellees/Counter-Appellants Floyd and Margie M. Manar have an easement by prescription to use a roadway crossing property owned by the Wessons. The Manars appeal the trial court's finding that the road is not a public road. The clear weight of the evid

Miami, Florida personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued the United States of American on Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theories claiming to have been damaged, injured and killed as a direct result of the the February 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida.

This settlement resolves all of the cases for $127.5 million. The settle

Beaumont, Texas personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant United States of America on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered $625,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident caused by a United States Postal Service employee.

28 U.S.C. 2671, et seq. provide:



The head o