Raleigh, North Carolina personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued The United States of American on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damages as a direct result of an motor vehicle accident caused by a federal government employee.

Alexandria, Virginia personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued the United States of America on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damages as a direct result of the negligence operation of a motor vehicle by a federal government employee.

Fort Lauderdale, Florida personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued the United States of America on Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence wrongful death theories claiming to have been injured and/or damaged in a motor vehicle accident caused by a federal government employee.

El Reno, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represent Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on a Governmental Tort Claims Act theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a flood of water and sewage in their home on May 21, 2019.

Portland, Oregon personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant United States of America on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $782,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.

Sacramento, California personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued the United States of America on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damages in a motor vehicle accident caused by a federal government employee.

San Francisco, California personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued the United States of America on Federal Tort Claims Auto Negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $1 million in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident caused by a federal government employee.

Los Angeles, California personal injury car wreck lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued the United States of America on Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theories claiming to have been injured and/or damaged as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident caused by a federal government employee.

Phoenix, Arizona personal injury car wreck lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued the United States of America on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damaged in a motor vehicle accident caused by a government employee.

Fort Wayne, Indiana personal injury negligence lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims ACt medical malpractice theory claiming to have been injured and/or damage as a result of substandard care.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $10,000 in damages and/or injuries as a result of negligent acts, errors and/or omissions by Defendants' employees.

Plaintiff was riding he bicycle on the evening of November 4, 2019 on the sidewalk in Moore, Oklahoma when his front wheel suddenly d

Austin, Texas personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiffs, individually and as next friend of N.E., a minor child, who sued the United States of American on a Federal Tort Claims Acts medical malpractice theory claiming to have been injured and/or damaged as a direct result of substandard health care provided to their child.

Greenbelt, Maryland personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued The United States of America on a Governmental Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damages as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident caused by a government employee.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued the United States of America on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damaged in a motor vehicle accident caused by a Federal Government employee.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma insurance law lawyer lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

¶1 The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit certified to this Court two questions of law:

1. Where a plaintiff is injured by entry of an adverse judgment that remains unstayed, is the injury sufficiently certain to

Chickasha, Oklahoma insurance law lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of an insurance contract theory.

¶2 The Linns ran a cattle stocker operation. They purchased calves that were between 400 and 450 pounds, fed them until they were approximately 700 pounds, and then sold them by the pound. The Linns began financing the purchase of calves through Natio

Ada, Oklahoma insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of an insurance contract theory.

¶1 This litigation arose from an automobile collision on icy roads between an insured of United Services Automobile Association (USAA) and an uninsured motorist. On Thanksgiving Day, November 23, 1993, Bob Newport was driving home in a sleet storm. The roads

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

¶0 Insured sued insurer for underinsured (UIM) motorist benefits and breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing. She was awarded the $15,000 UIM policy limits by summary judgment; a jury verdict awarded her $10,000 actual and $1.5 milli

Chicago, Illinois personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued the United States of America on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $755,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident caused by a Post Service Employee.