This appeal arises from a longstanding employment dispute between appellant Axel D. Haubold and his former employer Medical Carbon Research Institute, LLC, (Medical Carbon) and related companies, MCRI, Inc., and On-X Life Technologies (jointly MCRI). Haubold appeals the trial court’s order granting partial summary judgment dismissing his claims against MCRI and final judgment awarding MCRI attor

Vaughn L. and Celeste Bailey appeal from a summary judgment for Bank of America, N.A., formerly known as BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP, which in turn was formerly known as Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP. In two 1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2

points, the Baileys contend that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment. We affirm.

Background

In 2005, Vaughn obtain

Before us is an appeal in a personal injury suit brought by an employee of Riley Construction named Krien. Riley, the general contractor of a construction project in Wisconsin, had hired Harsco Corporation to sup2

No. 13‐2272

ply scaffolding for the project. Krien, injured in a fall when a plank on a scaffold that he was standing on broke, sued Harsco. The parties settled his claim

We decide whether Candace Ruitenberg’s interest in an equitable share of marital property pending her divorce from Paul Ruitenberg, III is a pre-petition “claim” against Paul’s bankruptcy estate. The issue has divided Bankruptcy Courts in our Circuit.

Paul filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, and Thomas J. Orr was appointed as the Trustee of the bankruptcy es

[¶1] Appellants Powder River Basin Resource Council, Wyoming Outdoor Council, Earthworks, and Center for Effective Government appeal from a district court order affirming the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (Commission) Supervisor’s denial of a public records request. Recently-adopted regulations require companies engaged in hydraulic fracturing to disclose the chemical compounds us

We must deal with a case of mistaken identity arising out of the arrest and detention of a person named on a warrant not intended to describe him.

I

A

In July 1985, a Los Angeles Superior Court issued an arrest warrant for “Santiago Rivera.” On June 18, 1989, officers of the Montclair Police Department arrested Santiago

RIVERA V. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 5

River

George Barlow started going to sea as a deck hand in 1974. He was twenty‐three. In 1986, after working aboard ships for more than a decade, and without ever having attended college, he passed the merchant marine officer’s exam, licensing him to serve as an officer aboard U.S. flagged cargo vessels. In 1992 he received his master’s license, the merchant marine equivalent of a captain’s qual

Patricia Castagna, a former employee of Majestic Kitchens, Inc., appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Cathy Seibel, Judge) dismissing Castagna’s state‐law tort claims as time‐barred. Castagna contends that the statute of limitations applicable to her tort claims against both Majestic and her former boss, Bill Luceno, was tolled by h

Plaintiff‐appellant Robert E. Wilson, III appeals from the January 7, 2013 judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (George B. Daniels, Judge) granting the motion to dismiss of defendant‐appellee Citibank, N.A. and all related Citibank entities (the “Citibank defendants”) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The complaint alleges that t

This lawsuit, stemming from Ranger Abbott’s purchase in 2008 of a 7.77-acre tract of land (the Property) in Paris, Texas, is burdened with a complex history involving a previous lawsuit and appeal to this Court. Both suits concern attempts by Abbott to expand a mobile home park on the Property. When Abbott purchased the Property, approximately one-half of it was being used as a mobile home park

Plaintiffs David Esparza, Alan Mark, Anthony Mora, and Irene Redd were peace officers employed by the Los Angeles County Office of Public Safety (OPS). The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors voted to dissolve OPS and merge its functions with that of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department. Plaintiffs each had the opportunity to apply for deputy sheriff positions, but did not meet the Sh

Ernesto Galarza is a U.S. citizen who was arrested for a drug offense, posted bail, and instead of being released, was held in custody by Lehigh County under an immigration detainer issued by federal immigration officials. Three days after Galarza posted bail, immigration officials learned that he was a U.S. citizen. The detainer was withdrawn and Galarza was released. Galarza then filed this § 1

Plaintiff‐appellant Robert E. Wilson, III appeals from the January 7, 2013 judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (George B. Daniels, Judge) granting the motion to dismiss of defendant‐appellee Citibank, N.A. and all related Citibank entities (the “Citibank defendants”) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The complaint alleges that t

¶1 Plaintiff/Appellant Erin Bates (Plaintiff) seeks review of the trial court's order granting the motion to dismiss of Defendants/Appellees P.C. Cast, a/k/a Phyllis Cast, an individual, Kristin Cast, an individual, and St. Martin's Press, a Foreign Limited Liability Company (individually, by name, or, collectively, Defendants) on Plaintiff's claims to actual and punitive damages for defamation,

¶1 Claimant Patricia Yvonne Carney seeks review of an order of a three-judge panel of the Workers' Compensation Court, which affirmed the trial court's finding that her injury was not compensable. The single issue on appeal is whether Claimant sustained an accidental personal injury arising out of and in the course of her employment. After a review of the record and applicable law, we find that t

¶1 This Court is asked to decide whether the damage provisions in section 1350 of the Oklahoma Anti-Discrimination Act (OADA), 25 O.S.2011, §§ 1101 through 1706, violate the special law prohibitions in Article 5, §§ 46 and 59 of the Oklahoma Constitution. This issue arose in a case filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma. The plaintiff alleged her former

Appellee Sondra Kelso, in her capacity as independent administrator of the estate of Helen Jones Schweng, brought suit against Peggy McCoy, Eugene Braun, and appellants Randall Holt and Judy Holt to recover estate assets.1 Following a bench trial, the trial court found all four defendants jointly and severally liable to Sondra for breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, theft, and civil conspiracy a

Appellant, Marilyn Weaver, sued appellee, Paul McKeever, for malicious prosecution based on a number of citations McKeever issued to Weaver for her non-code-compliant roof. McKeever moved to dismiss, asserting governmental immunity because he issued the citations in his capacity as a code enforcement

2

officer for the City of Missouri City. The trial court granted McKeever’s motion

Julio Cesar Villanueva Cornejo, 33, of Michoacán, Mexico was sentenced today to six years in prison for possessing a firearm and distributing illegal rat poison and insecticides in connection with a large marijuana cultivation operation in the Lilly Canyon area of the Sequoia National Forest, U.S. Attorney Benjamin B. Wagner announced. Villanueva was also ordered to pay $4,294 in restitution to t

COMES NOW the Plaintiff Christopher McDonough, by and through his attorneys of record, Brown Jones Anderson, PLLC, and for his cause of action against the Defendant the City of Oklahoma City, a domestic corporation, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, alleges and states as follows:

JURIDICSON AND VENUE

1. That the Plaintiff Christopher McDonough

Plaintiff, Janetta Blakely, by and through her attorney, J.P. Longacre, and for her said Cause of action against the Defendant, Ethan Rieves, alleges and states as follows:

1) Plaintiff’s cause of action is for false arrest and imprisonment, malicious prosecution, libel and slander contrary to
Oklahoma State law and contrary to the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment of the United Stat

Jussie Joe Manahl sued Integris Baptist Medical Center, Inc. and Brent C. Wilson, M.D. on medical negligence (medical malpractice) theories. The claims made are not available.

ANSWER OF DEFENDANT BRENT C. WILSON, M.D. The Defendant, Brent C. Wilson, M.D. answers Plaintiffs Petition as follows:

This Defendant does not have sufficient information to admit or deny the allegation I of t

These appeals arise from a tragic event—Michael and Carole Merhige’s 35-year-old son, Paul, shot and killed family members at a Thanksgiving gathering in Jupiter, Florida. Following the shooting, representatives of the victims’ estates sued the Merhiges, collectively alleging negligence.1 The circuit court dismissed the complaints for failure to state a cause of action. We affirm the ruling

Luis A. Mendoza (“Mendoza”), an inmate at the Polunsky Unit in Livingston, Texas, proceeding pro se, filed an in forma pauperis civil suit against seven1 employees of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (“TDCJ”). The trial court dismissed the suit because Mendoza failed to comply with the requirements of Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & R

In this medical negligence case, Maria Cervantes, Individually and as Next Friend of Alek Gonzalez, and Omar Gonzalez, Individually and as Next Friend of Alek Gonzalez,1 appeal the trial court’s order granting Titus Regional Medical Center’s plea to the jurisdiction. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

Cervantes was admitted to Titus Re