Boston, Massachusetts civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on Americans with Disabilities Act violation theories.
Plaintiff Amy Rae filed suit against Defendants Woburn Public Schools, the City of Woburn, Superintendent Matthew Crowley, and Principal Carl Nelson (collectively, “Defendants”) bringing counts for retaliatory harassment pursuant to the Rehabi
Maurisha Wilson v. Mercedes-Benz US International, Inc.
Tuscaloosa, Alabama employment law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued defendant on a job discrimination theory.
Maurisha Wilson (“Wilson” or “Plaintiff”) brings the present action against her former employer, Mercedes-Benz U.S. International, Inc. (“MBUSI” or “Defendant”). (Doc. 1.) Wilson asserts a retaliation claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a job discrimination theory under 42 U.S.C. 2000e.
This case arose from the termination of Plaintiff's employment as a Special Assets Manager III in Defendant's Special Assets Division (SAD). On January 15, 2019, Plaintiff received notice that her position was being eliminated due to reorganization of De
United States of America v. Trusts of Salazar Dos Santos and America Dos Santos
Boston, Massachusetts civil litigation lawyer represented Defendants accused of violating the Fair Housing Act by sexually harassing female tenants for at least 11 years.
The Justice Department’s lawsuit, filed in 2019, alleged that from at least 2008, Dos Santos subjected multiple female tenants to unwelcome sexual contact, which included coercing them to engage in sex acts, physically
United States of America v. Amy Kay Thomas and Lawrence William Vaughan
Springfield, Missouri criminal defense lawyers represented Defendants charged for their roles in a kidnapping conspiracy that resulted in the death of the victim.
Amy Kay Thomas, 39, of Webb City, Mo., and Lawrence William Vaughan, also known as “Scary Larry,” 51, of Newton County, Mo., pleaded guilty today in separate appearances before U.S. District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. Thomas
Miguel Quiroz v. Empirian Village of Maryland, LLC
Greenbelt, Maryland civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a job discrimination theory.
This is a dispute over the end of an employment relationship between Plaintiff Miguel Quiroz (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Empirian Village of Maryland, LLC (“Empirian”). Mr. Quiroz alleges that Empirian, the Maryland based owner of the Franklin Park at Greenbelt Sta
Denise Ligon, et al. v. Tri-Star Imports, Inc., et al.
St. Louis, Missouri civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued defendant on discrimination, harassment and retaliation theories.
Denise Logon and Dorothy Robinson sued Tir-Star Imports, Inc. on job discrimination and hostile environment theories claiming that they were pressed to negotiate deals with African-Americans that they knew weren't fair.
Houston, Texas civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on an age job discrimination theory.
"The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) is a federal law that prohibits employment discrimination against individuals who are 40 years of age or older. The ADEA applies to employers with 20 or more employees, employment agencies, and labor unions.
Charleston, South Carolina civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a job discrimination theory under 42 U.S.C. 2000e.
This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff Carnell Pinckney's (“Plaintiff” or “Pinckney”) complaint alleging race, color, and/or national origin claims of discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment in violation of Tit
Terilyn K. Wallis v. National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation
Alexandria, Virginia civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a job discrimination theory under 42 U.S.C. 2000e.
Plaintiff Terilyn K. Wallis was a regional vice president for defendant National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation (CFC) until she was terminated. Wallis contends that CFC discriminated and retaliated against her on the basis of sex in viol
Catherine Lancaster v. Sprint/United Management Co., a/k/a Sprint Nextel Corp.
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on an Americans With Disabilities Act violation theory.
Plaintiff filed this action alleging discrimination on the basis of race, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, and disability, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. She also alleges claims of retaliation, including a
Baltimore, Maryland civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on an employment discrimination theory.
In this employment discrimination case, plaintiff Madeline Morey filed suit against defendants "Carroll County Government" and the "Carroll County Board of Commissioners" (collectively, "Carroll County" or the "County"). ECF 1.1 In a First Amended Complaint (ECF 1
