New Britain, Connecticut insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a breach of contract theory.

Action to recover underinsured motorist benefits allegedly due under a certain automobile insurance policy issued by the defendant, and for other relief, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of New Britain, where the court, Morgan, J., granted th

Florence, South Carolina civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff on South Carlina Tort Claims Act negligence and 42 U.S.C. 1983 constitutional rights violation theories.

Jessica Gifford filed suit against the Horry County Police Department (“HCPD�) and Saundra Rhodes (collectively, Appellants), and several other parties with whom Gifford settled her claims prior to trial. Giffo

Kalispell, Montana real property lawyers represented the parties in a dispute over the use of an easement.


Bardos sued for injunctive relief, asserting trespass, nuisance, and quiet title actions against Spoklie regarding the two easements, and requested a temporary restraining order. The District Court denied the request and set a show cause hearing for issuance of a preliminary inj

Liberty, Missouri personal Injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on medical malpractice negligence theories.

Harned has diagnoses of bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. She also has a history of psychosis, and in May, 2016, Harned began experiencing psychotic symptoms. In May and June, 2016, Harned was seen twice at Trum

Demarlo Berry appeals from an order dismissing his third postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The district court dismissed Berry's petition as procedurally barred, without allowing discovery or conducting an evidentiary hearing. Berry supported his petition with declarations under penalty of perjury that, if true, may establish a gateway claim of actual innocence. We conclude

Carson City, Nevada


This is a proper person appeal from an order of the district court denying a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jackie Glass, Judge.

        On July 31, 1995, the district court convicted appellant, pursuant to a jury verdict, of burglary, robbery with the use of a deadly weapon, an

In his second appeal in this post-conviction case, Christopher Conley Tapp challenges the district court's summary dismissal of his claim that his defense counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to present evidence of his diminished mental capacity in support of his trial motion to suppress his confession as involuntary. Tapp contends that because this Court, in his prior post-convictio

Cape Girardeau, Missouri personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, which sued Defendant on a produce liablity theory.

Dicamba, an herbicide, kills broadleaf weeds that have grown resistant to
other herbicides. Unfortunately, traditional dicamba herbicides harm crops.
Traditional dicamba herbicides are also “volatile,� meaning that they tend to
vaporize and move off ta

New York, New York intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on copyright infringement theories.


At the end of four-day trial, the jury unanimously found the defendants liable for copyright infringement and defamation. The jury awarded $30, 000 in damages to Plaintiff Muddy Water Pictures LLC (“Muddy�) for infringement of Muddy's copyright in the f

Anderson, South Carolina plaintiff Personal injury lawyers sued Defendant on constructive notice negligence theories.

On the evening of May 21, 2014, Denise Garrison went to Target in Anderson,
South Carolina with her eight -year-old daughter. Upon her arrival at the store,
Denise parked her car in Target's parking lot, and she and her daughter exited the
vehicle. Before enter

Dr. Rachel Tudor sued her former employer, Southeastern Oklahoma State
University, under Title VII, claiming discrimination on the basis of sex, retaliation,
and a hostile work environment after Southeastern denied her tenure, denied her the
opportunity to reapply for tenure, and ultimately terminated her from the university.
A jury found in favor of Dr. Tudor on her discrimin

Stockton, CA - Labor Law, Employment Law

Petitioner Asmik Akopyan, M.D., seeks a writ of mandate
compelling the trial court to vacate its order granting real party
in interest Zulma Unzueta’s peremptory challenge to Judge
Anthony J. Mohr under Code of Civil Procedure section 170.61
filed after this court conditionally reversed the judgment entered
after a jury trial in favor of Dr. Akopyan on Unzueta’s claim for
m

A jury returned verdicts in favor of plaintiff Timothy King against defendant U.S.
Bank National Association (U.S. Bank) for defamation, wrongful termination in violation
of public policy, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing,
awarding King almost $24.3 million in compensatory and punitive damages. U.S. Bank
filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding

¶1 Defendant in error, Fielding D. Haas, referred to as plaintiff, commenced proceedings against S.J. Sarkeys, an individual, and Sarkeys, Inc., a corporation, referred to as defendants, to recover attorney's fee allegedly due him. Plaintiff's action was predicated on the grounds that he had, at the request of defendants and each of them, commenced to perform and did perform professional services

George Fenimore was 92 and suffering dementia. On
March 27, 2013, his family took him to a local hospital because he
was incontinent and would not shower. This local hospital is not
a defendant.
On March 29, 2013, the local hospital transferred Fenimore
to a second hospital, which was UCLA Resnick Neuropsychiatric
Hospital. Within minutes of arriving at the second hospital,

Andrew M.’s petition for writ of mandate presents an issue of first impression:
does a conditional reversal and limited remand to the juvenile court to conduct a transfer
hearing pursuant to Proposition 57, the Public Safety and Rehabilitation Act of 2016
(Cal. Const., art. I, § 32), constitute a “new trial” for purposes of exercising a Code of
Civil Procedure section 170.61 challe