Tulsa County, OK - In re the Marriage of MEN and JRN

PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE
Petitioner MEN, for her Petition for Dissolution of Marriage against JRN,
states as follows:
1. Petitioner is now, and has been for more than six (6) months preceding the filing of the Petition herein, an actual resident in good faith of the State of Oklahoma and a resident of Tulsa Count

Tulsa County, OK - In re the Marriage of BK and MK

PETITION
Comes now ***, Petitioner, and for her Petition she states as follows:
1. Petitioner and Respondent were lawfully married in St. Louis, Missouri, on February 14,
1987. Their marital relation has existed since that time. The parties have two minor children, to wit:
*** born June 29, 1999; and *** born November 6, 1

Tulsa County, OK - In re the Marriage of AI and BRW

PETITION TO ESTABLISH PATERNITY, CUSTODY, VISITATION AND SUPPORT
COMES NOW Plaintiff, ***, by and through her attorney, Michael Staggs, and respectfully represents and shows this Court the following, to-wit:
1. Plaintiff is now and has been for more than six (6) months preceding the filing of this Petition to Establish Paternity,

Tulsa County, OK - In re the Marriage of SC and DSR

PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE
COMES NOW the Petitioner, SC, and for her cause of action against the Respondent, DSR, alleges and states as follows:
I. That the Petitioner is now and has been, for more than six (6) months next preceding the filing of the Petition herein, an actual resident in good faith of the State of Okla

Tulsa County, OK - In re the Marriage of ECP and GLP

COMES NOW, ECP, Pro Se, and files her Petition for Divorce and Dissolution of Marriage against GLP, Respondent, for the following reasons to wit:
1. That Petitioner has resided in the County of Tulsa and in the State of Oklahoma for at
least six months prior to commencement of this action. Petitioner currently resides at
* *

Tulsa County, OK - Criminal defense lawyer Fred DeMier represented Julie Ann Trevino who was charged by the State of Oklahoma with falsely impersonating another to create liability in violation of 21 O.S. 15314 which provides:


Any person who falsely personates another, and in such ass

The sole issue raised in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in finding that J. Felix Gonzalez-Limon gave his interest in the real property located at 1226 Patton Boulevard (the “Property”) to Ruth Gonzalez. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
BACKGROUND
Gonzalez-Limon and Gonzalez were married in 2004 and purchased the Property in March of 2009. In June of 20

Jerry Day appeals from a final decree of divorce awarding Jeanie Day spousal maintenance of $500 per week for 60 calendar months and thereafter $300 per week for 15 calendar months. On appeal, Jerry argues in five issues that “there is no evidence” to satisfy the statutory requirements for spousal maintenance or
2
support either of the two findings necessary to overcome the pre

Appellant, Roy Keith Coble, challenges the trial court’s order denying his Petition to Modify Spousal Maintenance and awarding appellee, Kelly Dianne Adams, attorney’s fees. In three issues, Coble contends that the record does not
2
support the trial court’s judgment and the trial court erred in determining that it was without jurisdiction to modify the underlying orde

Ross Stone appeals a final summary judgment in favor of Nancy Stone in a dispute involving the distribution of homestead property as part of the estate of their father Jerome Stone. The trial court held the transfer of the property to Nancy following Jerome’s death was not an impermissible devise of homestead property. We find the trial court erred in part, but nevertheless affirm the resul

When does "until" begin? Here we conclude it begins when "when" begins.
A marital settlement agreement provides that the trial court will reserve jurisdiction to award long-term spousal support "until" the wife is released from prison. Wife files a motion for support five weeks before her release, set to be heard three days after her release. The hearing is twice continued, once because husban

This class action is about meal breaks at work. Lead plaintiff Darryl Collins charged that Walgreens violated employees’ rights to meal breaks. The trial court denied Collins’s motion for class certification. We affirm.
Walgreens is a drug store chain. In a coordinated action, Collins moved for class certification on the theory that Walgreens’s stated policy on meal breaks

Anna Maines Johnson filed for divorce from Daniel G. Johnson. After a bench trial, the trial court entered a Final Decree of Divorce and issued Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. In three stated appellate issues, Daniel challenges the trial court’s refusal to grant his reimbursement claim. Daniel contends that: (1) the trial court divested him of his “separate property” co

This is an appeal from a final decree of divorce in which Husband challenges the divestiture of his separate property. The litigants have been before the Court before. In Rivas v. Rivas, 320 S.W.3d 391 (Tex.App.--El Paso 2010, no pet.), we reversed a default judgment of divorce on procedural grounds. The case was remanded and following a bench trial, the decree at issue was entered. Because the tr

Tulsa County, Oklahoma - In re the Marriage of SC and DSR - Divorce Without Minor Chilren

PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE

COMES NOW the Petitioner, SC, and for her cause of action against the Respondent, DAVID SAMUEL REED, alleges and states as follows:

I. That the Petitioner is now and has been, for more than six (6) months next preceding the filing of the Petition

Tulsa County, Oklahoma - In re the Marriage of: ECP and GLP - Divorce with minor children

PETITION FOR DIVORCE AND DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE

COMES NOW, ECP and files her Petition for Divorce and Dissolution of Marriage against GLP, Respondent, for the following reasons to wit:

1. That Petitioner has resided in the County of Tulsa and in the State of Oklahoma for at
lea

Tulsa County, Oklahoma - In re the Marriage of GLC and JMC - Divorce with minor children

PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE
COMES NOW the Petitioner and informs the Court as follows:
1. The Petitioner is now and has been for six (6) months next preceding the filing of this petition, an actual resident, in good faith, of the State of Oklahoma.
2. The Petitioner is now and has

COMES NOW the Petitioner, DM, for cause of action against the Respondent, MM alleges and states that:
1. Residency. Petitioner is now and has been for more than six (6) Months preceding the filing of the Petition herein an actual resident, in good faith,7df the State of Oklahoma, and a resident of Tulsa County, for thirty (30) day&at the time this Petition is filed.
2. Date of Marriage. Th

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma County, OK - TDS sued JJS seeking a divorce claiming that their relationship as husband and wife was irretrievably broken and seeking a determination of child support and custody of the couples minor children.

MOTION TO MODIFY DECREE OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE

COMES NOW, Petitioner TDS, by and through her attorney of record, Jacob L. Rowe, and hereby moves

Appellant, the former wife, challenges the trial court’s final order of dissolution of marriage in which the court adopted and incorporated the parties’ marital settlement agreement. Appellant argues the court erred in entering the final order over her objection and pending motion to set aside the marital settlement agreement, without first giving her the opportunity to be heard and

Joseph Lehmann and his wife, Therese Lehmann, own beachfront
property on the Gulf of Mexico in Sarasota County. Cocoanut Bayou Association (CBA)
owns the parcel of beachfront property adjoining the Lehmanns' property on the north.
- 2 -
This appeal involves a dispute over the location of the property line dividing their
respective parcels.
The facts regarding the parties' c

Elenita L. Fajota appeals from an order of the trial court granting her ex-husband, Romer N. Fajota, joint legal custody of the couple's three children. According to Elenita, Romer admitted to engaging in acts of domestic violence, and the trial court found that Romer had committed domestic violence against her. Elenita contends that in awarding Romer joint legal custody, the trial court failed to

Jim Thorpe, multi-sport Olympic gold medalist
(“Thorpe”), died in California in 1953 without a will.1 His
estate was assigned to his third wife, Patricia (“Patsy”),2 who
eventually buried him in what is now Jim Thorpe,
Pennsylvania (“the Borough”). Jim Thorpe, Pennsylvania
was a newly-formed borough that had been created from the
merger o

We are asked to decide whether a district court abused its discretion in sanctioning Alex Crabb, an attorney, for making misleading statements in a court filing.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings
The facts underlying the sanctions ruling are lengthy but straightforward. Troy Dowell pled guilty to several crimes, including neglect of a dependent. The sentencing court ordered his imprisonm

At issue in this case is the constitutionality of a Wisconsin statute, Wis.Stat. §§ 245.10(1), (4), (5) (1973), which provides that members of a certain class of Wisconsin residents may not marry, within the State or elsewhere, without first obtaining a court order granting permission to marry. The class is defined by the statute to include any "Wisconsin resident having minor issue not in