1. That Plaintiff and William M. Grass were married on or about January 8,2001, and resided in Tulsa County, Oklahoma, as husband and wife.
2. That on or about September 13,2004, Defendant William M. Grass obtained title to the following real estate, commonly known as 4813 S 86 B Avenue, Tulsa OK, legally described as Lot 52, Block 3, Regency Park West Addition, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma

¶1 The plaintiff in error hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged by information filed in the county court of Kay County with the crime of omitting to provide for a minor child. He was tried before a jury on the 2nd day of April, 1953, found guilty, but the jury being unable to agree upon the penalty to be assessed, left that to the court, who entered judgment ordering that defendant

¶1 Plaintiff in error Theodore Dobbins, defendant below, was charged by information in the court of common pleas of Tulsa county, Oklahoma, with the offense of failing to provide food, shelter and medical attention for his 3 children of the ages of 11, 9 and 6 years, without lawful excuse so to do and contrary to the provisions of Title 21, § 852 [21-852], O.S. 1951, making it a misdemeanor

Both Idaho and Nevada have passed statutes and enacted constitutional
amendments preventing same-sex couples from marrying and refusing to recognize
same-sex marriages validly performed elsewhere.2 Plaintiffs, same-sex couples
1A disposition in Jackson v. Abercrombie, Nos. 12-16995 & 12-16998, is
forthcoming separately.
2Idaho Const. Art. III, § 28 (“A marriage between

Tulsa, OK - Jennifer Parquette Moses v. Christopher sued Moses, D.O. on a civil assault and battery theory claiming:

COMES NOW, Plaintiff, Jennifer Parquette Moses (“Plaintiff’) and for her Petition
against Defendant, Christopher Moses, D.O. (“Defendant”) would state as follows:
VENUE AND JURISDICTION
1. Plaintiff is a resident of Tulsa County, Oklahom

David Eron Bouknight appeals from a final judgment approving the final accounting of the proceeds from the sale of a pickup truck. The pickup was the sole property awarded David in the final decree of divorce entered in this case. David’s points of error are overruled, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
I. Background
David had been married to Cynthia Dianne Bouknight f

Tulsa, OK - Clyde Klemker and Jennifer Dimaggio f/k/a Jennifer Page sued Radergroup, Inc., David Tyrien, Joanne Tyrien and Excel PM, LLC d/b/a Radergroup Property Management on breach of contract theories claiming:

1. Plaintiffs, Clyde Klemke [hereinafter individually identified as “Klemke”j and Jennifer DiMaggio [hereinafter individually identified as “Page” (othe

Before the Court is the motion of appellant Danny Schwartz requesting appellate review
of the trial court’s order sustaining the court reporter’s and appellees’ contests to his affidavit of
indigence. The trial court held a hearing on the contests and signed an order sustaining them on
September 15, 2014.
In reviewing a trial court’s order sustaining a c

Based on jury findings, the trial court terminated the parental rights of appellants D.F.
and B.W. to their daughter, J.F. Appellants contend that termination of their parental rights is not
in J.F.’s best interest. We will affirm the judgment terminating appellants’ parental rights.
BACKGROUND
On June 27, 2013, the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services

The plaintiffs ("McLaughlin
Group"), who prevailed in a constitutional challenge to Section 3
of the Defense of Marriage Act ("DOMA"), 1 U.S.C. § 7, appeal from
the district court's denial of fees and costs under the Equal
Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(a)(1) & (d).
Whether prevailing parties who successfully challenged Section 3 of
DOMA are enti

DENVER, CO – Mathew Zuckerman, age 70, of Woody Creek, Colorado, was sentenced on September 16th, 2014 by U.S. District Court Judge Robert E. Blackburn to serve 24 months in federal prison on income tax related charges, United States Attorney John F. Walsh and IRS Criminal Investigation Special Agent in Charge Stephen Boyd announced. Following his prison sentence, Mathew Zuckerman was orde

Plaintiffs, appellants, and cross-respondents (plaintiffs) are consumers who
purchased vehicles from defendant, respondent, and cross-appellant Raceway Ford
(Raceway), an automobile dealership. Plaintiffs alleged numerous causes of action based
2
on laws proscribing certain acts against consumers, unfair competition, and deceptive
business practices, bringing both individual cl

Billy Coppedge appeals the trial court’s final decree of divorce in which the trial court dissolved his marriage to Linda Coppedge and divided the couple’s assets based on a mediated settlement agreement signed by both parties. We affirm.
I. Background Facts
Billy Coppedge (Appellant) and Linda Coppedge (Appellee) married on December 16, 1976. On January 20, 2012, Appellant f

Gerald K. Johnson, appearing pro se, appeals the trial court’s judgment denying his request for partition of a 45.59 acre tract and a permanent injunction against Frederick M. Evans and Christine G. Evans. In ten issues, Johnson contends the trial court erred in its judgment. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Several years before Johnson filed the underlying suit, the Evanses filed an action se

In this case, both sides—William R. Knoderer and wife, Susan M. Knoderer, as plaintiffs (collectively, the Knoderers), and State Farm Lloyds, Penni Perkins, and Tom Roberts, as defendants (collectively, State Farm)—have gone to remarkable lengths in fighting an insurance dispute over a house flooded by a leak in its plumbing system. The record reveals voluminous discovery, the substa

Defendant Scott Andrew Christensen was convicted of multiple counts of lewd acts upon a child under the age of 14 (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (a)). In his first trial, he was convicted with respect to his acts against one victim, Spencer S., but the jury deadlocked with respect to his acts against another victim, Joshua K. Defendant argues the court made various errors in the retrial on the counts

Family Code section 4325 establishes a rebuttable presumption against an award of spousal support to a spouse who has been convicted of an act of domestic violence against the other spouse.1 Here we must determine whether the family court erred in terminating spousal support to a wife where the wife pleaded no contest to and was convicted of an act of domestic violence before enactment of section

Christina L. (Mother) appeals an order granting to her and respondent Chauncey
B. (Father) joint legal and physical custody of their son, O.L., and daughter, A.L. She
contends the trial court improperly modified an earlier custody determination (under
which she had sole legal and physical custody of the children) without finding a
significant change in circumstances, and that the t

Defendant William Karl Olsen was committed for an indeterminate term to the California Department of Mental Health (now, State Department of State Hospitals; hereafter the Department) after a jury determined defendant to be a sexually violent predator within the meaning of the Sexually Violent Predator Act (SVPA). (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.)1
Defendant appealed from the judgment, c

Tulsa criminal defense lawyer Michael Manning represented Tamelan Danyeal Lyles who was charged by the State of Oklahoma with:

Count # 1.
Count as Filed: FFP, FALSELY PERSONATE ANOTHER TO CREATE LIABILITY , in violation of 21 O.S. 1531.4
Date Of Offense: 12/21/2012

Party Name: Disposition Information:

Tulsa criminal defense lawyer Scott Goode represented Marco Louis Barnett, who was charged by the State of Oklahoma with:

Count # 1.
Count as Filed: ODO, UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DRUG WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE , in violation of 63 O.S. 2-401 A1
Date Of Offense: 12/18/2012

J.M. appeals from a judgment on reserved issues granting joint physical custody of
his son Joey to J.M. and G.H., Joey’s mother, and allowing her to take Joey with her to
live in Israel during the school year. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
We use the parties’ first names to simplify and humanize our opinion in this
intensely contested custo

In this post-divorce modification suit affecting the parent-child relationship,
appellant, Monica Posey, appeals the trial court’s final order naming James
Michael Lowe (“Michael”) as sole managing conservator of Z.M.L. and C.M.L.,
their minor children. Specifically, Monica contends the trial court abused its
discretion in ordering Monica’s possession of a

The appearance of settled mineral ownership—which had surrounded three neighboring tracts of oil-and-gas-producing land in Gregg County since the late 1800s or early 1900s—was shattered beginning in late 2008 when three different lawsuits arose involving eight parties, one consolidation, multiple partial summary judgments, and two trials. One group of the parties generalized it well:

Indiana and Wisconsin are among the shrinking majority of states that do not recognize the va-lidity of same-sex marriages, whether contracted in these states or in states (or foreign countries) where they are law-ful. The states have appealed from district court decisions invalidating the states’ laws that ordain such refusal.
Formally these cases are about discrimination against the s