| Imputed Fault Law |
| |
|
Ivan Schweitzer and Marjorie Schweiter v. Robert Hardy, Jr. and B&L Transport, Inc.
|
Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.
This case was filed in the Weld County District Court, 2024CV30157, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.
Colorado state law uses 50% modified comparative negligence. That means that if a driver is over 50% at fault for an accident, they give u... More... $1 (08-09-2024 - CO)
|
|
Alan W. Shields v. Wondy Trucking, LLC
|
Wichita, Kansas personal injury auto negligence truck wreck lawyer presented the Plaintiff.
Kansas Personal injury protection (PIP) insurance is a type of auto insurance required for drivers in Kansas. PIP insurance covers any expenses you might incur as a result of injuries from an automobile accident, regardless of the cause of the accident or who was at fault.... More... $1 (08-02-2024 - KS)
|
|
Murphy Edwards, et al. v. USA Truck, Inc. and Brittany Murray
|
Houston, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.
This case was filed in the 80th Judicial District Court Harris County, 22-13619, and was removed to federal court by USA Truck.
Texas uses a modified form of comparative negligence (also known as "proportionate responsibility" in Texas). This mea... More... $1 (08-02-2024 - TX)
|
|
Jesus Martinez Gomez v. Donald Blakeley and Market Express, LLC
|
Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the Thirteenth Judicial District of New Mexico, case number 22cv90, and was removed to federal court by Market Express.
If you were injured in an accident but were also at fault to some degree, your possible recovery ... More...
$1 (07-31-2024 - NM)
|
|
Sophia Chattin v. Romell Jones and Blue Thunder Trucking, Inc.
|
Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.
Indiana follows a modified comparative fault system, which means that an injured party can still recover damages even if they are partially at fault for their injuries. However, the amount of compensation is reduced by the percentage of the plaintiff's fault.... More... $1 (07-29-2024 - IN)
|
|
Mary Kathleen McGovern v. Joseph P. McGovern
|
Albany, New York divorce lawyers represented the parties in a marriage dissolution.
Plaintiff (hereinafter the wife) and defendant (hereinafter the husband) were married in 1997 and have two children (born in 1999 and 2002). In 2014, the husband abandoned the marital residence, but the parties reconciled until 2017, when the husband again left the marital residence... More... $0 (07-27-2024 - NY)
|
|
Allen Carson v. New Bern Transport Corporation
|
Fort Wayne, Indiana personal lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
Elements of a negligence claim in Indiana:
Breach of duty of care that directly causes injury.
Indiana follows a modified comparative fault system, which means that an injured party can still recover damages even if they are partially at fault for their... More... $1 (07-19-2024 - IN)
|
|
John Baker and Michelle Baker v. Terrell J. Echols and Quality Carriers, Inc.
|
Fort Wayne, Indiana personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.
Indiana follows a modified comparative fault system, which means that an injured party can still recover damages even if they are partially at fault for their injuries. However, the amount of compensation is reduced by the percentage of the plainti... More... $1 (07-19-2024 - IN)
|
|
State of Tennessee v. Isaiah Jamal Simmons
|
|
Knoxville, Tennessee criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with contending the trial court abused its discretion by denying alternative sentencing and by failing to allow the defense to present argument at sentencing
One count of attempted second degree murder, a Cla... More... $0 (07-18-2024 - TN)
|
|
Kelly Chinea v. Woodward Camp, et al.
|
Williamsport, Pennsylvania personal lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.
Plaintiffs Kelly and Julio Chinea, on behalf of their minor daughter, S.C., sue Woodward Pennsylvania, LLC (“Woodward”), the gymnastics camp their daughter attended in the summers of 2018 and 2019. They also sue two former Woodward employees: Woodward's then-admini... More... $1 (07-12-2024 - PA)
|
|
Shengli Chi v. Road Huggers Trucking, LLC
|
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
Pennsylvania follows a 51 percent comparative negligence rule, which means you can recover damages if you were less than 51 percent at fault. If you are found to carry more than 50 percent of the fault for the accident, you will be unable to seek compensatio... More... $0 (07-12-2024 - PA)
|
|
Angeleana Goebel v. Big Brothers Big Sisters of America Corporation
|
Tampa, Florida personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.
Under modified comparative negligence, people who suffer injuries due to negligence can only recover damages if they are found to be 50 percent or less responsible for their injuries. If somebody was hurt in the accident and is more than 50 percent at fault, the new law bars... More... $1 (07-11-2024 - FL)
|
|
Deborah Ann Willis v. United States of America
|
Kansas City, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.
Missouri is a pure comparative negligence state, while it recognizes the legal doctrine of "comparative negligence." Under this doctrine, a plaintiff who is partially responsible for their own injuries may only collect damages in proportio... More... $0 (07-03-2024 - MO)
|
|
Tiffany L. Taylor v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, d/b/a Amtrak
|
Kansas City, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.
Missouri is a pure comparative negligence state, while it recognizes the legal doctrine of "comparative negligence." Under this doctrine, a plaintiff who is partially responsible for their own injuries may only collect damages in proportion to the defendant's degree o... More... $1 (07-03-2024 - MO)
|
|
Rodney Whiddon v. C-Level Trucking, LLC, et al.
|
Dallas, Texas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the 13th Judicial Court of Navarro County, TX, C-22-30898-CV, and was removed to federal court by C-Level Trucking, LLC , et al.
Texas uses a modified form of comparative negligence (also known as "proportionate responsibility" in Texas)... More... $1 (07-03-2024 - TX)
|
|
Ferrell A. Hodges and Marquell L. Hodges v. Barbaro V. Garcia and Mega Trucking, LLC
|
Charleston, South Carolina personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.
In South Carolina, the negligence system is a "modified comparative negligence" system where you can collect even if you were partly at fault for the harm done to you.... More... $1 (07-03-2024 - SC)
|
|
David Luis Moreno v. Force Transportaton, Inc., et al.
|
Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the St. Francis County Circuit Court, 62CV-23-00151-3, and was removed to federal court by Force Transportation, Inc.
According Arkansas law, if you're found to be less than 50% at fault in an accident, your portion of the fault ... More... $1 (07-01-2024 - AR)
|
|
Astrid Orellana, et al. v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
|
Los Vegas, Nevada personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories. a
This case was filed in the Eighth Judicial District Court, County of Clark, A-23-869450-C, and was removed to federal court by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saint.
Nevada uses a legal principle called Modified Comparative Negligence. Thi... More... $1 (06-30-2024 - )
|
|
Jennifer Arreola v. C.R. England, Inc.
|
Las Vegas, Nevada personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the Eighth Judicial District Court, a-23-868245-c, and was removed to federal court by C.R. England, Inc.
Nevada uses a legal principle called Modified Comparative Negligence. This rule allows for the distribution of fault among all ... More... $0 (06-28-2024 - NV)
|
|
Timothy Reed v. Joseph Brian Quagliata
|
Prescott, Arizona personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the Coconino County Superior Court, S0300CV202300324, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.
Arizona operates under a “comparative fault” rule, meaning that if someone is entirely to blame for the auto accident, they... More... $1 (06-28-2024 - AZ)
|
|
United States of America v. Alexander Guilkarov, et al.
|
|
New York, New York criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with insurance fraud.
New York and New Jersey No-Fault insurance laws require a driver’s automobile insurance company to pay automobile insurance claims automatically for certain types of motor vehicle accidents, provided that the claim is legitimate ... More...
$0 (06-24-2024 - NY)
|
|
Terrance D. Petty, Jr. v. Howard S. Hamrick and Walnut Ridge Trucking, Inc.
|
Beckley, West Virginia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.
West Virginia follows a modified comparative negligence law that says the injured party can only receive compensation if they are deemed to be 49% or less at fault for the accident. If they are 50% or more responsible, they will not be compensated.
... More... $0 (06-21-2024 - WV)
|
|
United States of America v. Peter Khaimov, et al.
|
|
New York City, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with No-Fault Insurance Fraud
No-Fault Insurance Fraud
New York and New Jersey No-Fault insurance laws require a driver’s automobile insurance compa... More... $0 (06-20-2024 - NY)
|
|
Jeremy Eaton, et aux. v. DoorDash, Inc.
|
|
Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence law.
This case was filed in the District Court, Douglas County, Colorado, 2023CV30755, and was removed to federal court by DoorDash.
Colorado state law uses 50% modified comparative negligence. That means that if a driver is o... More...
$1 (06-18-2024 - CO)
|
|
Shalia Malone a/k/a Shaila Malone v. State of Mississippi
|
|
Jackson, Mississippi criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant with filing a motion for post-conviction relief (PCR), arguing that her conviction should be set aside based on newly discovered evidence and because her attorney provided ineffective assistance
More... $0 (06-16-2024 - MS)
|
Next Page
|
