Imputed Fault Law
 
Angeleana Goebel v. Big Brothers Big Sisters of America Corporation


Tampa, Florida personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.



Under modified comparative negligence, people who suffer injuries due to negligence can only recover damages if they are found to be 50 percent or less responsible for their injuries. If somebody was hurt in the accident and is more than 50 percent at fault, the new law bars

More...   $1 (07-11-2024 - FL)

Deborah Ann Willis v. United States of America


Kansas City, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.



Missouri is a pure comparative negligence state, while it recognizes the legal doctrine of "comparative negligence." Under this doctrine, a plaintiff who is partially responsible for their own injuries may only collect damages in proportio

More...   $0 (07-03-2024 - MO)

Tiffany L. Taylor v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, d/b/a Amtrak


Kansas City, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.



Missouri is a pure comparative negligence state, while it recognizes the legal doctrine of "comparative negligence." Under this doctrine, a plaintiff who is partially responsible for their own injuries may only collect damages in proportion to the defendant's degree o

More...   $1 (07-03-2024 - MO)

Shalia Malone a/k/a Shaila Malone v. State of Mississippi.

Jackson, MS criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant with filing a motion for post-conviction relief (PCR), arguing that her conviction should be set aside based on newly discovered evidence and because her attorney provided ineffective assistance

More...   $0 (12-30-2022 - MS)

Donald Wayne Thomas, Jr. v. State of Oklahoma

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant seeking the writ of certiorari.




Petitioner pled guilty on July 11, 2023, and was sentenced the same day. Thirteen days later, Petitioner returned to

More...   $0 (05-30-2024 - OK)

Rodney Whiddon v. C-Level Trucking, LLC, et al.


Dallas, Texas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.



This case was filed in the 13th Judicial Court of Navarro County, TX, C-22-30898-CV, and was removed to federal court by C-Level Trucking, LLC , et al.

Texas uses a modified form of comparative negligence (also known as "proportionate responsibility" in Texas)

More...   $1 (07-03-2024 - TX)

Randall Thomas Bailey v. Sara Elizabeth Bailey


Cody, Wyoming family law lawyers represented the Plaintiff and Defendants in a custody and child support dispute.




[¶3] The parties married in 2005 and have three minor children. Ms. Larson filed a complaint for divorce in December 2022. The parties filed a stipulated request for a GAL, which the district court granted in March 2023. A temporary custody hearing pro

More...   $0 (06-14-2024 - WY)

Ferrell A. Hodges and Marquell L. Hodges v. Barbaro V. Garcia and Mega Trucking, LLC


Charleston, South Carolina personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.



In South Carolina, the negligence system is a "modified comparative negligence" system where you can collect even if you were partly at fault for the harm done to you.

More...   $1 (07-03-2024 - SC)

David Luis Moreno v. Force Transportaton, Inc., et al.


Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.



This case was filed in the St. Francis County Circuit Court, 62CV-23-00151-3, and was removed to federal court by Force Transportation, Inc.

According Arkansas law, if you're found to be less than 50% at fault in an accident, your portion of the fault

More...   $1 (07-01-2024 - AR)

Dexy Sosa Martinez v. Cragi Catli and Lauren Johnson


Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.



In Oklahoma, the ability to pursue damages under comparative negligence applies when a crash victim is 49 percent or less liable for the accident. If a crash victim is at least 50 percent liable for the wreck, he or she can't seek compensation from other at-fault part

More...   $1 (06-12-2024 - OK)

Astrid Orellana, et al. v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints


Los Vegas, Nevada personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories. a



This case was filed in the Eighth Judicial District Court, County of Clark, A-23-869450-C, and was removed to federal court by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saint.


Nevada uses a legal principle called Modified Comparative Negligence. Thi

More...   $1 (06-30-2024 - )

Jennifer Arreola v. C.R. England, Inc.


Las Vegas, Nevada personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.



This case was filed in the Eighth Judicial District Court, a-23-868245-c, and was removed to federal court by C.R. England, Inc.

Nevada uses a legal principle called Modified Comparative Negligence. This rule allows for the distribution of fault among all

More...   $0 (06-28-2024 - NV)

Timothy Reed v. Joseph Brian Quagliata


Prescott, Arizona personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.



This case was filed in the Coconino County Superior Court, S0300CV202300324, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Arizona operates under a “comparative fault” rule, meaning that if someone is entirely to blame for the auto accident, they

More...   $1 (06-28-2024 - AZ)

United States of America v. Alexander Guilkarov, et al.


New York, New York criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with insurance fraud.



New York and New Jersey No-Fault insurance laws require a driver’s automobile insurance company to pay automobile insurance claims automatically for certain types of motor vehicle accidents, provided that the claim is legitimate

More...   $0 (06-24-2024 - NY)

Terrance D. Petty, Jr. v. Howard S. Hamrick and Walnut Ridge Trucking, Inc.


Beckley, West Virginia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.



West Virginia follows a modified comparative negligence law that says the injured party can only receive compensation if they are deemed to be 49% or less at fault for the accident. If they are 50% or more responsible, they will not be compensated.

More...   $0 (06-21-2024 - WV)

J. TODD SLAYTON v. ANGELA DILL

Little Rock, Arkansas Litigation lawyer represented the appellant with arguing in this one-brief appeal that the trial court erred in calculating his gross income as a self-employed restauranteur



Slayton and Dill married in March

More...   $0 (06-05-2024 - AR)

United States of America v. Peter Khaimov, et al.

New York City, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with No-Fault Insurance Fraud

No-Fault Insurance Fraud



New York and New Jersey No-Fault insurance laws require a driver’s automobile insurance compa

More...   $0 (06-20-2024 - NY)

Jeremy Eaton, et aux. v. DoorDash, Inc.


Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence law.



This case was filed in the District Court, Douglas County, Colorado, 2023CV30755, and was removed to federal court by DoorDash.

Colorado state law uses 50% modified comparative negligence. That means that if a driver is o

More...   $1 (06-18-2024 - CO)

DONALD WAYNE THOMAS, JR v. THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant with moving to dismiss the charges, claiming immunity from prosecution pursuant to the Stand Your Ground law



Petitioner pled guilty on July 11, 2023, and was

More...   $0 (05-30-2024 - OK)

Shalia Malone a/k/a Shaila Malone v. State of Mississippi

Jackson, Mississippi criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant with filing a motion for post-conviction relief (PCR), arguing that her conviction should be set aside based on newly discovered evidence and because her attorney provided ineffective assistance

More...   $0 (06-16-2024 - MS)

United States of America v. Mukhiddin Kadirov

New York City, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Laundering Millions Of Dollars Of Health Care Fraud Proceeds

Money Launderer Sentenced To 30 Months In Prison For Laundering Millions Of Dollars Of Health Care Fraud Proceeds

More...   $0 (06-13-2024 - NY)

United States of America v. Mukhiddin Kadirov

New York City, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Money Laundering

Money Launderer Sentenced To 30 Months In Prison For Laundering Millions Of Dollars Of Health Care Fraud Proceeds



Damian William

More...   $0 (06-13-2024 - NY)

Alisa Larsen v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, et al.


Portland, Oregon personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a product liability theory.




Oregon law limits damages in some product liability cases. The state's modified comparative negligence rule states that if you were 50 percent or less to blame for causing an accident, you may still recover damages, but tho

More...   $0 (06-10-2024 - OR)

Steven Harner v. Mercy Hospital Joplin


Springfield, Missouri personal Injury lawyers represent the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability theory.



Harner sued Mercy in negligence relating to injuries Harner sustained in December 2015 when he was shot by Kaylea Liska (“Liska”) in Mercy’s parking lot while visiting his daughter at Mercy’s Emergency Department. M

More...   $1500000 (06-07-2024 - MO)

Donald Wayne Thomas, Jr. v. State of Oklahoma

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant with seeking a writ of certiorari.



Petitioner pled guilty on July 11, 2023, and was sentenced the same day. Thirteen days later, Petitioner returned to cou

More...   $0 (05-30-2024 - OK)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer
Find a Case
AK Morlan
Kent Morlan, Esq.
Editor & Publisher