United States of America v. John Wyatt Duncan, Jr. |
TOPEKA, KAN. - A Topeka man was sentenced Monday to 57 months in federal prison after he pleaded guilty to federal bank fraud charges in connection with a plan to build an apartment complex in Junction City, U.S. Attorney Barry Grissom said today. |
Michele C. Tetreault v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company |
The Employee Retirement Income |
Shirley Temme v. Bemis Company, Inc. |
This appeal from an award of attorneys’ fees marks the end of protracted litigation between the parties. In 2008, the plaintiff class sued Bemis Company, Inc., for elimi-nating certain health-care benefits that they believed they were owed under a 1985 plant-closing agreement with Be-mis’s predecessor in interest. We reversed the district court’s initial grant of summary judgment to the defe... More... $0 (08-06-2014 - WI) |
Joseph Moyer v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company |
Joseph Moyer, an ERISA plan participant, appeals the district |
Richard Salzer v. SSM Health Care of Oklahoma, Inc. |
Richard Salzer sued SSM Health Care of Oklahoma, Inc. (“SSM”), alleging |
Western Dairy Transport, LLC v. Marcial Felipe Vasquez |
In this consolidated interlocutory appeal and petition for writ of mandamus, Appellant/Relator, Western Dairy Transport, LLC, challenges the trial court's order denying its motion to compel arbitration in the suit filed by Appellee/Real Party in Interest, Marcial Felipe Vasquez. We conclude that we lack jurisdiction over the petition for writ of mandamus. In the interlocutory appeal, we conclude t... More... $0 (07-30-2014 - TX) |
Wendy Jeanelle Hennig v. Matthew Michael Didyk |
Appellant Wendy Jeanelle Hennig appeals from a judgment entered in favor of appellee Michael “Miro” Didyk, individually and as independent administrator of the estate of Matthew Michael Didyk, deceased, appellant’s former husband, following a nonjury trial. In three issues, appellant argues the trial court erred by (1) failing to give effect to the decedent’s designation of appellant as th... More... $0 (07-28-2014 - TX) |
Lori Rhea v. General Atomics |
This appeals presents a challenge to General Atomics' employment practice of requiring exempt employees to use their annual leave hours when they are absent from |
Marc Kutten v. Sun Life Assurance Co. |
Marc Kutten sued Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, alleging that Sun |
Vista Quality Markets v. Jorge Lizalde |
Vista Quality Markets (“Vista”) appeals the trial court’s order denying its motion to compel arbitration. We reverse and remand to the trial court with instructions to enter an order compelling arbitration. |
Tamica Shaw v. The Prudential Ins. Co. |
In this Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") case, Tamica Shaw appeals from the district court's grant 1 of summary judgment in favor of The Prudential Insurance Company of America ("Prudential"). We affirm. |
Sabrina Laguna v. Coverall North America, Inc. |
This case asks us to decide whether a settlement agreement reached before class certification between Plaintiffs and Defendants is fair, reasonable, and adequate. We agree with the district court that the settlement merits approval, and we affirm. |
Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. |
The Copyright Act (Act) protects copyrighted works published before1978 for an initial period of 28 years, renewable for a period of up to 67 years. 17 U. S. C. §304(a). The author’s heirs inherit the renewal rights. See §304(a)(1)(C)(ii)–(iv). When an author who has assignedher rights away “dies before the renewal period, . . . the assignee maycontinue to use the original work only if the... More... $0 (05-19-2014 - DC) |
Armand Santoro v. Accenture Federal Services, LLC |
Dr. Armand Santoro appeals the district court’s order granting the motion by Accenture Federal Services, LLC (Accenture) to compel arbitration. Because we agree with the district court that the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank) does not invalidate the arbitration agreement between Accenture and Santoro, we affirm. |
Gregory Saffer v. JP Morgan Chase Bank |
Plaintiff and appellant Gregory Saffer worked for Washington Mutual Bank (WaMu) between May 2007 and January 2008. In September 2008, WaMu failed. In short order, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was appointed as receiver for the bank, and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (JPMC) purchased some of WaMu’s assets and liabilities. The FDIC published notices informing creditors that claims ... More... $0 (04-29-2014 - CA) |
Kevin Grupp v. DHL Express (USA), Inc. |
In this action filed by Kevin Grupp and Robert Moll (Relators) on behalf of the State of California (State) pursuant to the California False Claims Act (Gov. Code, § 12650 et seq.) (the State Act), the question presented is whether an action alleging DHL Express (USA), Inc., DHL Worldwide Express, Inc. and DPWN Holdings (USA), Inc. (collectively DHL) overcharged and fraudulently billed the State ... More... $0 (04-11-2014 - CA) |
Brent Middleton v. J. Hoyt Stephenson |
Brent Middleton and others—all Utah citizens—brought several federal-law claims against J. Hoyt Stephenson in the United States District Court for the District of Utah. Stephenson fought back with state-law counterclaims and a third-party complaint asserting state-law claims against multiple third-party defendants—also all Utah citizens. |
Kevin Grupp v. DHL Express (USA), Inc., et al. |
In this action filed by Kevin Grupp and Robert Moll (Relators) on behalf of the State of California (State) pursuant to the California False Claims Act (Gov. Code, § 12650 et seq.) (the State Act), the question presented is whether an action alleging DHL Express (USA), Inc., DHL Worldwide Express, Inc. and DPWN Holdings (USA), Inc. (collectively DHL) overcharged and fraudulently billed the State ... More... $0 (04-11-2014 - CA) |
Willard Bender v. Newell Window Furnishings, Inc. |
Newell Window Furnishings, an employer that lost a court case in the Western District of Michigan involving retirement benefits, appeals an order of the district court awarding attorney’s fees and costs to the plaintiff-retirees under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B). The district court awarded No. 12-2059 Bender, et al. v. Newell Window Fur... More... $0 (03-17-2014 - MI) |
In the Matter of the Worker's Compensation Claim of Don Birch |
[¶1] Appellant Don Birch sought reimbursement for travel expenses related to chiropractic treatment he received at the Utah Spine and Disc Clinic in Murray, Utah from the Wyoming Division of Workers’ Compensation (Division). Mr. Birch lived in Daniel, Wyoming. The Division denied his request for reimbursement because traditional types of chiropractic care, manipulation and traction could have b... More... $0 (03-13-2014 - ) |
John J. Donachie v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston |
In this appeal, we write primarily to clarify the scope of a |
Robert Riley v. Metropolitian Life Insurance Company d/b/a Metlife |
In 2012, plaintiff Robert Riley filed suit under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., against defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. ("MetLife"), arguing that MetLife had been underpaying his monthly benefits since its 2005 denial of his assertion that he was entitled to a larger payment calculation under his long-term disability insurance p... More... $0 (03-04-2014 - MA) |
Robert Filey v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company d/b/a Metlife |
In 2012, plaintiff Robert Riley filed suit under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., against defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. ("MetLife"), arguing that MetLife had been underpaying his monthly benefits since its 2005 denial of his assertion that he was entitled to a larger payment calculation under his long-term disability insurance pl... More... $0 (03-04-2014 - MA) |
Patrick Garrett v. Principal Life Insurance |
This is an appeal by defendant Principal Life Insurance Company (Principal) from the district court’s orders that reversed Principal’s decision to deny plaintiff Patrick Garrett’s claim for medical benefits and awarded Mr. Garrett the full amount of his claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. |
Jacqueline Barnhardt v. Open Harvest Cooperati |
Jacqueline Barnhardt appeals the district court’s1 entry of summary judgment in favor of Open Harvest Cooperative (“Open Harvest”) on her claim alleging a |
Next Page |