Concord, New Hamphire civil rights lawyers represented the Petitioner seeking a writ of habeas corpus.

The respondent, the Warden of the New Hampshire State Prison, has moved for summary judgment. After a hearing, and for the following reasons, the Warden's motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part, and an evidentiary hearing will be scheduled to address Chretien's

Omaha, Nebraska employment law lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued her former employer challenging a restrictive covenant in an employment contract.


Jacqueline Damon was an at-will employee of Universal Group, Ltd. Damon who was then a resident of Omaha, Nebraska, started working for Universal in 2014. That same year, Universal promoted Damon to the position of Account Manager, a

New York City, New York criminal defense lawyers represented Defendants charged with conspiracy to commit murdeer, use of certain weapons of mass destruction, terrorism, and protection of officers and employees of the United. States

James Cromitie, Onta Willaims, David Williams, and Laguerre Payen were all charged with engaging in a conspiracy to commit terrorist act.


In Oct

Nashville, Tennessee personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on class action municipal code violation theory claiming that Defendant violated § 6.81.170(E) of the Code of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee ("Ordinance”)[2] stated that it was "prohibited and unlawful” for a booting service "[t]o fail to remove the boot wi

¶1 The Petitioners consist of healthcare providers, Tulsa Women's Reproductive Clinic, LLC, Alan Braid, M.D., Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains, Inc., Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma and an advocacy group, the Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice. The Respondents consist of the Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, the district attorneys of Oklahoma

Plaintiff Terry Hobbs moves for partial summary judgment as to the fair report privilege and opinion (Doc. No. 26) and moves for partial summary judgment as to his status as a public figure (Doc. No. 31). Defendant Natalie Pasdar moves for summary judgment on all claims against her (Doc. No. 38). Defendants Martha Seidel (now Martha Maguire), Emily Robison, and the Dixie Chicks move for summa

Grand Rapids, Michigan civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a 1983 claim of excessive use of force.

Joseph Meadows claims that officers used excessive force to
detain him one night during a traffic stop. Officer Steve Dumond began pursuing Meadows after
he passed Dumond on the highway while traveling nearly ninety miles per hour. During the
subsequen

Guthrie, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit a felony after former conviction of a felony in violation of 21 O.S. 421, which provides:

A. If two or more persons conspire, either:

1. To commit any crime; or

2. Falsely and maliciously to indict another for any crime, or to procure another to be charged or arrested for a

Washington, North Carolina family law lawyers represented the parents of twin boys in a parental termination proceeding.


Respondent-mother Courtney J. and respondent-father Jeremy J. appeal from orders entered by the trial court terminating their parental rights in their twin sons J.C.J. and J.R.J.[1] After careful consideration of the parents' challenges to the trial

1

Bloomington, Indiana family law lawyer represented respondents appealing the termination of their parental rights.


[¶4] Parents are the biological parents to De.S., born on January 14, 2013, and D.S., born on August 8, 2017. On May 30, 2020, Children were removed from Parents on an emergency basis as it was alleged that Parents were engaged in substance abuse and had neglected the e

On April 6, 2004, upon application of the United States ("the Government"), defendant Todd Allen Feldman was ordered to appear on May 27, 2004, for a judgment debtor examination under Rule 69 and California Code of Civil Procedure ("C.C.P.") § 708.110. On May 24, 2004, defendant filed an ex parte application for an order to dismiss the action, for a protective order or, in the alternative, for

New York City, New York criminal defense lawyers represented defendant objecting to the production of documents.


It is well settled that one who challenges a subpoena issued by the Attorney General, which is presumptively valid, has the burden of proof to establish the invalidity of the subpoena (see, Mtr. of Edge Ho Holding Corp. v. Higgins, 256 N.Y. 374, 176 N.E. 537) and both Mack

St. Paul, Minnesota criminal defense lawyers represented Defendant who was held in contempt for refusing to answer questions propounded to him by a grand jury,


The Court's order permitted Kiewel to purge himself of contempt by appearing before the grand jury on September 19, 1952. He appeared before that body on that day and presented to the jury a statement theretofore prepared by h

Petitioner has been convicted of criminal contempt for refusing to obey a federal court order requiring him to answer certain questions asked in a grand jury investigation. He raises here important issues as to the application of the privilege against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment, claimed to justify his refusal.



Page 481

A special federal