Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Gage Austin Reust v. State of oklahoma, ex rel Service Oklahoma

Date: 07-01-2026

Case Number: VC-2026-65

Judge: Lory Dewey

Court: District Court, Canadian County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: Brian Morton

Defendant's Attorney:

Description:
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff whose driving privileges were removed by Service Oklahoma after convicting of a DUI.

The Plaintiff claimed that the requirement that he install a mandatory ignition interlock program called IDAP but the requirement is so punitive in nature that it violates Double Jeopardy protections in the United States and Oklahoma Constitutions.
Outcome:
Judgment in favor of Service Oklahoma but holding that the Plaintiff may apply to opearte vehicle owned or leased by an eligible employer, without an ignition lock device and may drive with an interlock device install on his personal vehicle.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Gage Austin Reust v. State of oklahoma, ex rel Service Ok...?

The outcome was: Judgment in favor of Service Oklahoma but holding that the Plaintiff may apply to opearte vehicle owned or leased by an eligible employer, without an ignition lock device and may drive with an interlock device install on his personal vehicle.

Which court heard Gage Austin Reust v. State of oklahoma, ex rel Service Ok...?

This case was heard in District Court, Canadian County, Oklahoma, OK. The presiding judge was Lory Dewey.

Who were the attorneys in Gage Austin Reust v. State of oklahoma, ex rel Service Ok...?

Plaintiff's attorney: Brian Morton.

When was Gage Austin Reust v. State of oklahoma, ex rel Service Ok... decided?

This case was decided on July 1, 2026.