Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
State of Oklahoma v. W.C.P.
Date: 04-23-1990
Case Number: JF-8901923
Judge: Russell Hall
Court: District Court, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma
Plaintiff's Attorney: Oklahoma County, Oklahoma District Attorney's Office
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Oklahoma City Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Description:
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with first degree rape in violation of 21 O.S. 1114, robbery with a dangerous weapon in violation of 21 O.S. 801, and concealing stolen property in violation of 21 O.S. 1713.
Reported by: Kent Morlan
Appellant stipulated that if evidence were presented by the State the Court would find prosecutive merit in all of the cases.
The provision that permits the juvenile court to waive its exclusive jurisdiction and certify a child to stand trial as an adult contemplates the exceptional case in which the child is not amenable to treatment under the juvenile facilities and programs available to the court. T.C. v. State, 740 P.2d 739 (Okl.Cr. 1987); J.T.P. v. State, 544 P.2d 1270, 1275 (Okl.Cr. 1975). See In re E.O., 703 P.2d 192, 193 (Okl.Cr. 1985). W.C.P. does not present the exceptional case.
Reported by: Kent Morlan
Appellant stipulated that if evidence were presented by the State the Court would find prosecutive merit in all of the cases.
The provision that permits the juvenile court to waive its exclusive jurisdiction and certify a child to stand trial as an adult contemplates the exceptional case in which the child is not amenable to treatment under the juvenile facilities and programs available to the court. T.C. v. State, 740 P.2d 739 (Okl.Cr. 1987); J.T.P. v. State, 544 P.2d 1270, 1275 (Okl.Cr. 1975). See In re E.O., 703 P.2d 192, 193 (Okl.Cr. 1985). W.C.P. does not present the exceptional case.
Outcome:
Reversed and remanded.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of State of Oklahoma v. W.C.P.?
The outcome was: Reversed and remanded.
Which court heard State of Oklahoma v. W.C.P.?
This case was heard in District Court, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, OK. The presiding judge was Russell Hall.
Who were the attorneys in State of Oklahoma v. W.C.P.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Oklahoma County, Oklahoma District Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Oklahoma City Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was State of Oklahoma v. W.C.P. decided?
This case was decided on April 23, 1990.