Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Date: 03-18-2026
Case Number: CR2021-003151-001
Judge: Monica Edelstein
Court: Superior Court, Maricopa County, Arizona
Plaintiff's Attorney: Maricopa County, Arizona, District Attorney's Office
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Phoenix Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
To bring an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, a
defendant must show both that counsel's performance was deficient and
that the defendant was prejudiced as a result. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687. A
counsel's performance is deficient if it falls "below an objective standard of
reasonableness." Id. at 688. "[A] court must indulge a strong presumption
that counsel's conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable
professional assistance; that is, the defendant must overcome the
presumption that, under the circumstances, the challenged action 'might be
considered sound trial strategy.'" Id. at 689 (quoting Michel v. Louisiana, 350
U.S. 91, 101 (1955)). To establish prejudice, a defendant must "show that
there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional
errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." Strickland,
466 U.S. at 694.
Application for post conviction denied.
Affirmed
About This Case
What was the outcome of ?
The outcome was: The Defendant pleaded guilty and was sentenced to from 10–25 years to 12–20 years. Application for post conviction denied. Affirmed
Which court heard ?
This case was heard in Superior Court, Maricopa County, Arizona, AZ. The presiding judge was Monica Edelstein.
Who were the attorneys in ?
Plaintiff's attorney: Maricopa County, Arizona, District Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Phoenix Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was decided?
This case was decided on March 18, 2026.