Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

State of Oklahoma v. K.M.B.

Date: 08-04-2025

Case Number: CM-2023-381

Judge: David H. Halley

Court: District Court, Canadian County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: Canadian County, Oklahoma District Attorney's Office

Defendant's Attorney:

Click Here For The Best El Reno Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory





Description:
El Reno, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:



OSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE (METHAMPHETAMINE AND MARIJUANA), in violation of 63 O.S. 2-402



UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-405(B)
Outcome:
CRT MIN. THE DEFT APPEARS IN PERSON ALONG WITH HER ATTORNEY. THE STATE APPEARS THRU AUSTIN MURREY. DEFT IS SWORN, TESTIMONY IS TAKEN. DEFT TESTIFIES THAT SHE UNDERSTOOD THE QUESTIONS ON THE SUMMARY OF FACTS AND THAT HER ANSWERS WERE TRUTHFUL AND HONEST. PLEA AGREEMENT ON COUNT 1 IS A 1 YEAR DEFERRED AND ON COUNT 2 IS A 1 YEAR DEFERRED. EACH WITH A $50 FINE, $50 VCA. BOTH COUNTS TO RUN CONCURRENT. DRUG AND ALCOHOL ASSESSMENT AND ANY FOLLOW UP REQUIREMENTS ARE TO BE COMPLETED. SUPERVISION BY THE DA'S OFFICE. DEFT UNDERSTOOD THE PLEA AND PLEADS GUILTY TO BOTH COUNTS. THE COURT ACCEPTS THAT PLEA. DEFT NEEDED NO FURTHER EXPLANATION OF HER RIGHTS TO APPEAL. COURT EXECUTES THE SUMMARY OF FACTS ALONG WITH THE RULE 8 HEARING AND THE RULES AND CONDITIONS OF DA SUPERVISION. JUDGE HALLEY

Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of State of Oklahoma v. K.M.B.?

The outcome was: CRT MIN. THE DEFT APPEARS IN PERSON ALONG WITH HER ATTORNEY. THE STATE APPEARS THRU AUSTIN MURREY. DEFT IS SWORN, TESTIMONY IS TAKEN. DEFT TESTIFIES THAT SHE UNDERSTOOD THE QUESTIONS ON THE SUMMARY OF FACTS AND THAT HER ANSWERS WERE TRUTHFUL AND HONEST. PLEA AGREEMENT ON COUNT 1 IS A 1 YEAR DEFERRED AND ON COUNT 2 IS A 1 YEAR DEFERRED. EACH WITH A $50 FINE, $50 VCA. BOTH COUNTS TO RUN CONCURRENT. DRUG AND ALCOHOL ASSESSMENT AND ANY FOLLOW UP REQUIREMENTS ARE TO BE COMPLETED. SUPERVISION BY THE DA'S OFFICE. DEFT UNDERSTOOD THE PLEA AND PLEADS GUILTY TO BOTH COUNTS. THE COURT ACCEPTS THAT PLEA. DEFT NEEDED NO FURTHER EXPLANATION OF HER RIGHTS TO APPEAL. COURT EXECUTES THE SUMMARY OF FACTS ALONG WITH THE RULE 8 HEARING AND THE RULES AND CONDITIONS OF DA SUPERVISION. JUDGE HALLEY

Which court heard State of Oklahoma v. K.M.B.?

This case was heard in District Court, Canadian County, Oklahoma, OK. The presiding judge was David H. Halley.

Who were the attorneys in State of Oklahoma v. K.M.B.?

Plaintiff's attorney: Canadian County, Oklahoma District Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best El Reno Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.

When was State of Oklahoma v. K.M.B. decided?

This case was decided on August 4, 2025.