Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Heather McGraw and Joe McGraw v. All McClary Builders, LLC and Gary McClary and Nicole Taber
Date: 06-22-2022
Case Number: CJ-2021-2845
Judge: Civil Docket E
Court: In the District Court in and for Tulsa County, Oklahoma
Plaintiff's Attorney: <h2><br> <center><br> <a href="http://kentmorlan.com/wordpress1/" target="_new"><img width="200" src="http://www.morelawtv.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/AKMorlan.jpg"></a><br> <table><br> <a href="http://www.mrelawtv.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/WIN_20220414_11_05_59_Pro.mp4" target="_new">Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan</a><br> <br> <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/oklahoma/lawyers/tulsa/civil_litigationasp" target="_new">Click Here For The Best Tulsa Civil Litigation Lawyer Directory</a></font><br> </h2></center><br> </table><br>
Defendant's Attorney: John Dunn
Plaintiff claimed that they entered into a contract with McClary Builders on August 13, 2020 to construct a house for thme. Defendants were paid $151,605 for labor and materials, but Defendants failed to pay the suppliers and laborers with resulting liens being filed on the property by them.
About This Case
What was the outcome of Heather McGraw and Joe McGraw v. All McClary Builders, LL...?
The outcome was: Judgment in favor of Plaintiff for $161,366, plus attorney fees of $12,182.50 and costs in the amount of $737.39.
Which court heard Heather McGraw and Joe McGraw v. All McClary Builders, LL...?
This case was heard in In the District Court in and for Tulsa County, Oklahoma, OK. The presiding judge was Civil Docket E.
Who were the attorneys in Heather McGraw and Joe McGraw v. All McClary Builders, LL...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan Click Here For The Best Tulsa Civil Litigation Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: John Dunn.
When was Heather McGraw and Joe McGraw v. All McClary Builders, LL... decided?
This case was decided on June 22, 2022.