Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
City of Tulsa v. Jay Jones, et al.
Date: 08-09-2022
Case Number: CJ-2021-2784
Judge: Civil Docket F
Court: In the District Court in and for Tulsa County, Oklahoma
Plaintiff's Attorney: Mark Douglas Swiney
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan
Click Here For The Best Tulsa Civil Litigation Lawyer Directory
Description:
Tulsa, Oklahoma real property lawyers represented Defendants sued by the City of Tulsa on eminent domain theories seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights, title and interests in real property owned by Defendants for public use on Union Avenue.
GREENOUGH, KELLY M; CASE COMES ON APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONERS; MARK SWINEY APPEARS FOR PLAINTIFF; MICHAEL PACEWIZ APPEARS FOR DEFENDANTS ST LOUIS AND SAN FRANCISCO RAILROAD AND TEXAS COMPANY AND COSDE; NO OTHER APPEARANCES WERE MADE; INSTRUCTIONS TO COMMISONERS ENTERED; ORDER APPOINTING JAN GORDAN, RICK PETERSON, MAX TANKERSLY ENTERED.
The commissioners appointed by the Court awarded Defendants $1,750.
Outcome:
GREENOUGH, KELLY M; CASE COMES ON FOR HEARING VESTING TITLE, DISBURSE JUST COMPENSATION; MARK SWINEY APPEARS BY BLUE JEANS; NO OTHER APPEARANCES WERE MADE; BAILIFF CALLED 3 TIMES IN HALLWAY FOR JAY JONES AND SPOUSE NO APPEARANCES; ORDER VESTING TITLE; ORDER TO DISBURSE JUST COMPENSATION AND JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUDGMENT; CASE CLOSED ENTERED
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of City of Tulsa v. Jay Jones, et al.?
The outcome was: GREENOUGH, KELLY M; CASE COMES ON FOR HEARING VESTING TITLE, DISBURSE JUST COMPENSATION; MARK SWINEY APPEARS BY BLUE JEANS; NO OTHER APPEARANCES WERE MADE; BAILIFF CALLED 3 TIMES IN HALLWAY FOR JAY JONES AND SPOUSE NO APPEARANCES; ORDER VESTING TITLE; ORDER TO DISBURSE JUST COMPENSATION AND JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUDGMENT; CASE CLOSED ENTERED
Which court heard City of Tulsa v. Jay Jones, et al.?
This case was heard in In the District Court in and for Tulsa County, Oklahoma, OK. The presiding judge was Civil Docket F.
Who were the attorneys in City of Tulsa v. Jay Jones, et al.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Mark Douglas Swiney. Defendant's attorney: Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan
Click Here For The Best Tulsa Civil Litigation Lawyer Directory.
When was City of Tulsa v. Jay Jones, et al. decided?
This case was decided on August 9, 2022.
GREENOUGH, KELLY M; CASE COMES ON APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONERS; MARK SWINEY APPEARS FOR PLAINTIFF; MICHAEL PACEWIZ APPEARS FOR DEFENDANTS ST LOUIS AND SAN FRANCISCO RAILROAD AND TEXAS COMPANY AND COSDE; NO OTHER APPEARANCES WERE MADE; INSTRUCTIONS TO COMMISONERS ENTERED; ORDER APPOINTING JAN GORDAN, RICK PETERSON, MAX TANKERSLY ENTERED.
The commissioners appointed by the Court awarded Defendants $1,750.
About This Case
What was the outcome of City of Tulsa v. Jay Jones, et al.?
The outcome was: GREENOUGH, KELLY M; CASE COMES ON FOR HEARING VESTING TITLE, DISBURSE JUST COMPENSATION; MARK SWINEY APPEARS BY BLUE JEANS; NO OTHER APPEARANCES WERE MADE; BAILIFF CALLED 3 TIMES IN HALLWAY FOR JAY JONES AND SPOUSE NO APPEARANCES; ORDER VESTING TITLE; ORDER TO DISBURSE JUST COMPENSATION AND JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUDGMENT; CASE CLOSED ENTERED
Which court heard City of Tulsa v. Jay Jones, et al.?
This case was heard in In the District Court in and for Tulsa County, Oklahoma, OK. The presiding judge was Civil Docket F.
Who were the attorneys in City of Tulsa v. Jay Jones, et al.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Mark Douglas Swiney. Defendant's attorney: Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan Click Here For The Best Tulsa Civil Litigation Lawyer Directory.
When was City of Tulsa v. Jay Jones, et al. decided?
This case was decided on August 9, 2022.