Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

ONEOk Gas Transportation, LLC v. Industrial Investments, Inc. Morelaw Internet Marketing for Legal Professionals MoreLaw Can Make Your Phone Ring 888-354-4529

Date: 04-11-2017

Case Number: CJ-2017-31

Judge: Gary E. Miller

Court: District Court, Canadian County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: John Dale

Defendant's Attorney: Matthew Collins

Description:
El Reno, OK - Oklahoma City attorney Matt Collins represented Industrial Investment, Inc. which was sued by ONEOK Gas Gransportation, LLC on an eminent domain theory seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights, title and interests in real property owned by Industrial Investments.



CRT MIN. MATTER CAME ON FOR APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONERS. THE PLFT APPEARED BY AND THRU THEIR ATTORNEY LEWIS LENAIRE. THE DEFT SPECIALLY APPEARED BY AND THRU MATT COLLINS. IN A SPECIAL APPEARANCE THEY HAVE OBJECTED TO SERVICE. AFTER HEARING ARGUMENTS OF COUNSEL THE COURT IS ADVISED THAT THE DEFTS' COUNSEL WILL ACCEPT SERVICE THIS DATE FOR THE DEFT. THE COURT, UPON THAT ANNOUNCEMENT, GRANTS AN ADD'L 30 DAYS WITH WHICH TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER; IF NOT THE COURT WILL HEAR THE ISSUE ON APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONERS ON THE 6TH OF APRIL @ 9 AM. JUDGE JACK MCCURDY

Outcome:
Dismissed without prejudice by ONEOK Gas.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of ONEOk Gas Transportation, LLC v. Industrial Investments, ...?

The outcome was: Dismissed without prejudice by ONEOK Gas.

Which court heard ONEOk Gas Transportation, LLC v. Industrial Investments, ...?

This case was heard in District Court, Canadian County, Oklahoma, OK. The presiding judge was Gary E. Miller.

Who were the attorneys in ONEOk Gas Transportation, LLC v. Industrial Investments, ...?

Plaintiff's attorney: John Dale. Defendant's attorney: Matthew Collins.

When was ONEOk Gas Transportation, LLC v. Industrial Investments, ... decided?

This case was decided on April 11, 2017.