Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Jonathan Ray McCoy and Megan McCoy v. Braums, Inc.

Date: 05-06-2026

Case Number: CJ-2015-211

Judge: Paul Hesse

Court: District Court, Canadian County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: Mike Denton and c-magan-graham/" Magan Graham

Defendant's Attorney: Mike Brewer and Andre Farinha

Description:
El Reno, Oklahoma, personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who claimed to have been injured and/or damaged as a result of the Defendant's negligence.

By Kent Morlan

The Plaintiff was in a Braum's store in Yukon, Oklahoma on September 4, 2014, fell as a result of a wet floor being mopped by a Braum's employ.

CRT MIN. CASE CAME ON THIS DAY FOR JURY TRIAL. PLAINTIFF APPEARED WITH ATTORNEYS MICHAEL DENTON AND DANIEL TALBOT AND THE DEFENDANT CORPORATE REPRESENTATIVE APPEARED WITH ATTORNEYS MICHAEL BREWER AND ANDRE FARINHA. COURT REPORTER WAS BRIANNE EVANS. ALL PARTIES ANNOUNCED READY FOR TRIAL. A JURY OF 12 AND 1 ALTERNATE WERE SELECTED AND GIVEN THEIR OATH. COURT RULED ON PENDING MOTIONS. OPENING STATEMENTS WERE PRESENTED BY BOTH PARTIES. PLAINTIFF CALLED A WITNESS AND EXHIBITS INTRODUCED. TRIAL CONTINUED MARCH 3. JUDGE PAUL HESSE.



03-03-2026 CTFREE


CRT MIN. CASE CAME ON THIS FOR SECOND DAY OF JURY TRIAL. PLAINTIFF APPEARED WITH ATTORNEYS MICHAEL DENTON AND DANIEL TALBOT AND THE DEFENDANT CORPORATE REPRESENTATIVE APPEARED WITH ATTORNEYS MICHAEL BREWER AND ANDRE FARINHA. COURT REPORTER WAS BRIANNE EVANS. PLAINTIFF CALLED ADDITIONAL WITNESSES AND EXHIBITS INTRODUCED. TRIAL CONTINUED TO MARCH 4. JUDGE PAUL HESSE.



03-04-2026 CTFREE


CRT MIN. CASE CAME ON THIS FOR THIRD DAY OF JURY TRIAL. PLAINTIFF APPEARED WITH ATTORNEYS MICHAEL DENTON AND DANIEL TALBOT AND THE DEFENDANT CORPORATE REPRESENTATIVE APPEARED WITH ATTORNEYS MICHAEL BREWER AND ANDRE FARINHA. COURT REPORTER WAS BRIANNE EVANS. PLAINTIFF CALLED ADDITIONAL WITNESSES AND EXHIBITS INTRODUCED. PLAINTIFF RESTED. COURT TOOK PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DIRECTED VERDICT (DEMURRER) UNDER ADVISEMENT UNTIL AFTER THE DEFENDANT PRESENTED ITS EVIDENCE. DEFENDANT CALLED ONE WITNESS AND RESTED. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DIRECTED VERDICT ON THE ISSUE OF NEGLIGENCE WAS DENIED. MOTION FOR DIRECTED VERDICT ON THE ISSUE OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES WAS GRANTED. TRIAL CONTINUED TO MARCH 5 FOR INSTRUCTIONS AND CLOSING ARGUMENTS. JUDGE PAUL HESSE.



03-05-2026 CTFREE


CRT MIN. CASE CAME ON THIS DAY FOR FOURTH DAY OF JURY TRIAL. PLAINTIFF APPEARED WITH ATTORNEYS MICHAEL DENTON AND DANIEL TALBOT AND THE DEFENDANT CORPORATE REPRESENTATIVE APPEARED WITH ATTORNEYS MICHAEL BREWER AND ANDRE FARINHA. COURT REPORTERS WERE BRIANNE EVANS (INSTRUCTIONS AND JURY) AND HANNAH TIPTON (VERDICT). JURY INSTRUCTION CONFERENCE CONDUCTED. JURY INSTRUCTED AND CLOSING ARGUMENTS PRESENTED. JURY FOUND NEGLIGENCE BY BOTH PARTIES AND 10 JURORS SIGNED THE WHITE VERDICT FORM. JUDGE PAUL HESSE.



03-05-2026 IJ


INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN TO THE JURY PANEL AFTER EVIDENCE FILED
Outcome:
Defendant's verdict.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Jonathan Ray McCoy and Megan McCoy v. Braums, Inc.?

The outcome was: Defendant's verdict.

Which court heard Jonathan Ray McCoy and Megan McCoy v. Braums, Inc.?

This case was heard in District Court, Canadian County, Oklahoma, OK. The presiding judge was Paul Hesse.

Who were the attorneys in Jonathan Ray McCoy and Megan McCoy v. Braums, Inc.?

Plaintiff's attorney: Mike Denton and c-magan-graham/" Magan Graham. Defendant's attorney: Mike Brewer and Andre Farinha.

When was Jonathan Ray McCoy and Megan McCoy v. Braums, Inc. decided?

This case was decided on May 6, 2026.