Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

State of Oklahoma v. Contu Lee Everett

Date: 01-22-2026

Case Number: CF-2025-4749

Judge: April Seibert

Court: District Court, Tulsa County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney:
Danny Anson

Defendant's Attorney:


Click Here For The Best Tulsa Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory

Description:
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with felony possession of a firearm after former conviction of a felony (AFCF), in violation of 21 O.S. 1283, which provides:

A. Except as provided in subsection B of this section, it shall be unlawful for any person convicted of any felony in any court of this state or of another state or of the United States to have in his or her possession or under his or her immediate control, or in any vehicle which the person is operating, or at the residence where the convicted person resides, any pistol, imitation or homemade pistol, altered air or toy pistol, machine gun, sawed-off shotgun or sawed-off rifle, or any other firearm. Any person who violates the provisions of this subsection shall, upon conviction, be guilty of a Class B4 felony offense.

Unlawful possession of controlled drug with intent to distribute in violation of 63 O.S. 2-401, which provides:

B. Any person who violates the provisions of this section with respect to:

1. A substance classified in Schedule I or II, except for marijuana, upon conviction, shall be guilty of transporting or possessing with an intent to distribute a controlled dangerous substance, a Class C2 felony offense, and shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment as provided for in subsections B through F of Section 20M of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes, and a fine not more than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00), which shall be in addition to other punishment provided by law and shall not be imposed in lieu of other punishment. A second conviction for the violation of provisions of this paragraph is a Class C2 felony offense punishable by a term of imprisonment as provided for in subsections B through F of Section 20M of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes. A third or subsequent conviction for the violation of the provisions of this paragraph is a Class C2 felony offense punishable by a term of imprisonment as provided for in subsections B through F of Section 20M of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes;

2. Any other controlled dangerous substance classified in Schedule III, IV, V or marijuana, upon conviction, shall be guilty of a Class D1 felony offense and shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment as provided for in subsections B through F of Section 20N of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes and a fine not more than Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00), which shall be in addition to other punishment provided by law and shall not be imposed in lieu of other punishment. A second conviction for the violation of the provisions of this paragraph is a Class D1 felony offense punishable by a term of imprisonment as provided for in subsections B through F of Section 20N of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes. A third or subsequent conviction for the violation of the provisions of this paragraph is a Class D1 felony offense punishable by a term of imprisonment as provided for in subsections B through F of Section 20M of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes; or

3. An imitation controlled substance as defined by Section 2-101 of this title, upon conviction, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment in the county jail for a period not more than one (1) year and a fine not more than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00). A person convicted of a second violation of the provisions of this paragraph shall be guilty of a Class D2 felony offense and shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment as provided for in subsections B through F of Section 20O of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes, and a fine not more than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00), which shall be in addition to other punishment provided by law and shall not be imposed in lieu of other punishment.

Acquiring proceeds from drug activity in violation of 63 O.S. 2-503.1, which provides:

A. It is unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally to receive or acquire proceeds and to conceal such proceeds, or engage in transactions involving proceeds, known to be derived from any violation of the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, Section 2-101 et seq. of this title, or of any statute of the United States relating to controlled dangerous substances as defined by the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, Section 2-101 et seq. of this title. This subsection does not apply to any transaction between an individual and the counsel of the individual necessary to preserve the right to representation of the individual, as guaranteed by the Oklahoma Constitution and by the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution. However, this exception does not create any presumption against or prohibition of the right of the state to seek and obtain forfeiture of any proceeds derived from a violation of the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, Section 2-101 et seq. of this title, or of any statute of the United States relating to controlled dangerous substances as defined by the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, Section 2-101 et seq. of this title.

B. It is unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally to give, sell, transfer, trade, invest, conceal, transport, or maintain an interest in or otherwise make available anything of value which that person knows is intended to be used for the purpose of committing or furthering the commission of any violation of the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, Section 2-101 et seq. of this title, or of any statute of the United States relating to controlled dangerous substances as defined by the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, Section 2-101 et seq. of this title.

C. It is unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally to direct, plan, organize, initiate, finance, manage, supervise, or facilitate the transportation or transfer of proceeds known to be derived from any violation of the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, Section 2-101 et seq. of this title, or of any statute of the United States relating to controlled dangerous substances as defined by the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, Section 2-101 et seq. of this title.

D. It is unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally to conduct a financial transaction involving proceeds derived from a violation of the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, Section 2-101 et seq. of this title, or of any statute of the United States relating to controlled dangerous substances as defined by the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, Section 2-101 et seq. of this title, when the transaction is designed in whole or in part to conceal or disguise the nature, location, source, ownership, or control of the proceeds known to be derived from a violation of the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, Section 2-101 et seq. of this title, or of any statute of the United States relating to controlled dangerous substances as defined by the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, Section 2-101 et seq. of this title, or to avoid a transaction reporting requirement under state or federal law.

E. Any person convicted of violating any of the provisions of this section is guilty of a Class C2 felony offense and may be punished by imprisonment as provided for in subsections B through F of Section 20M of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes, or by a fine of not more than Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00), or by both said imprisonment and fine.
Outcome:
JUDGE APRIL SEIBERT: DEFENDANT PRESENT, IN CUSTODY, REPRESENTED BY CHRISTINE MESCHER. STATE REPRESENTED BY DANNY ANSON. COURT REPORTER WAIVED, DEFENDANT SWORN IN OPEN COURT, DEFENDANT ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY AND WAIVES RIGHTS TO PRELIMINARY HEARING, JURY TRIAL, AND NON-JURY TRIAL. COURT ACCEPTS PLEA AND FINDS DEFENDANT GUILTY. DEFENDANT SENTENCED TO:

COUNT 1) TWO (2) YEARS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ALL TIME IN, WITH CREDIT FOR TIME SERVED AND EARNED. DEFENDANT TO PAY COURT COSTS.
COUNT 2) TWO (2) YEARS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. COSTS ONLY.
COUNT 3) TWO (2) YEARS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. COSTS ONLY.

DEFENDANT ADVISED OF APPEAL RIGHTS, RULE 8 EXECUTED, JUDGEMENT AND SENTENCE ISSUED. COMMITMENT FOR PUNISHMENT ISSUE.

ALL COUNTS RUN CONCURRENTLY.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of State of Oklahoma v. Contu Lee Everett?

The outcome was: JUDGE APRIL SEIBERT: DEFENDANT PRESENT, IN CUSTODY, REPRESENTED BY CHRISTINE MESCHER. STATE REPRESENTED BY DANNY ANSON. COURT REPORTER WAIVED, DEFENDANT SWORN IN OPEN COURT, DEFENDANT ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY AND WAIVES RIGHTS TO PRELIMINARY HEARING, JURY TRIAL, AND NON-JURY TRIAL. COURT ACCEPTS PLEA AND FINDS DEFENDANT GUILTY. DEFENDANT SENTENCED TO: COUNT 1) TWO (2) YEARS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ALL TIME IN, WITH CREDIT FOR TIME SERVED AND EARNED. DEFENDANT TO PAY COURT COSTS. COUNT 2) TWO (2) YEARS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. COSTS ONLY. COUNT 3) TWO (2) YEARS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. COSTS ONLY. DEFENDANT ADVISED OF APPEAL RIGHTS, RULE 8 EXECUTED, JUDGEMENT AND SENTENCE ISSUED. COMMITMENT FOR PUNISHMENT ISSUE. ALL COUNTS RUN CONCURRENTLY.

Which court heard State of Oklahoma v. Contu Lee Everett?

This case was heard in District Court, Tulsa County, Oklahoma, OK. The presiding judge was April Seibert.

Who were the attorneys in State of Oklahoma v. Contu Lee Everett?

Plaintiff's attorney: Danny Anson. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Tulsa Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.

When was State of Oklahoma v. Contu Lee Everett decided?

This case was decided on January 22, 2026.