Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

State of Oklahoma v. Janet Maree Smith

Date: 04-17-2024

Case Number: CF-2023-3806

Judge: CF Docket C

Court: In the District Court in and for Tulsa County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: <a href="http://www.da.tulsacounty.org/" target="_new">Tulsa County District Attorney’s Office</a><br>

Defendant's Attorney: Click Here For The Best Tulsa Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory

Description:
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal law lawyer represented the Defendant, charged with Third-Degree Burglary in violation of 21 O.S. 1435 B, which provides:



A. Every person who breaks and enters the dwelling house of another, in which there is at the time no human being present, or any commercial building or any part of any building, room, booth, tent, railroad car or other structure or erection in which any property is kept or breaks into or forcibly opens, any coin-operated or vending machine or device with intent to steal any property therein or to commit any felony, is guilty of burglary in the second degree.



B. Every person who breaks and enters, climbs under, or uses any jack stands or any other item to raise any automobile, truck, trailer or vessel of another, in which any property is kept, with intent to:



1. Steal any property therein;



2. Steal any property attached thereto; or



3. Commit any felony, is guilty of burglary in the third degree.



C. As used in subsection B of this section, the term "property attached thereto" includes, but is not limited to, tires, wheels, and catalytic converters







Outcome:
04-17-2024 CONVICTED





JUDGE DAWN MOODY: DEFENDANT PRESENT, NOT IN CUSTODY, REPRESENTED BY AMANDA MIMS. STATE REPRESENTED BY IAN LEITCH. RECORDER USED. DEFENDANT SWORN IN OPEN COURT. DEFENDANT ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY, AND WAIVES RIGHTS TO JURY, NON JURY TRIAL. COURT ACCEPTS PLEA, COURT FINDS DEFENDANT GUILTY, DEFENDANT SENTENCED TO:



COUNT 1: TWO (2) YEARS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ALL TIME SUSPENDED. DEFENDANT ASSESSED COSTS.



CASE TO RUN CONCURRENT WITH ROGERS CO. CM-23-466 AND TULSA CO. CM-23-1469. DEFENDANT TO BE UNDER DISTRICT ATTORNEY SUPERVISION.



DEFENDANT ADVISED OF APPEAL RIGHTS, RULE 8 ISSUED, JUDGEMENT AND SENTENCE ISSUED. BOND EXONERATED.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of State of Oklahoma v. Janet Maree Smith?

The outcome was: 04-17-2024 CONVICTED JUDGE DAWN MOODY: DEFENDANT PRESENT, NOT IN CUSTODY, REPRESENTED BY AMANDA MIMS. STATE REPRESENTED BY IAN LEITCH. RECORDER USED. DEFENDANT SWORN IN OPEN COURT. DEFENDANT ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY, AND WAIVES RIGHTS TO JURY, NON JURY TRIAL. COURT ACCEPTS PLEA, COURT FINDS DEFENDANT GUILTY, DEFENDANT SENTENCED TO: COUNT 1: TWO (2) YEARS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ALL TIME SUSPENDED. DEFENDANT ASSESSED COSTS. CASE TO RUN CONCURRENT WITH ROGERS CO. CM-23-466 AND TULSA CO. CM-23-1469. DEFENDANT TO BE UNDER DISTRICT ATTORNEY SUPERVISION. DEFENDANT ADVISED OF APPEAL RIGHTS, RULE 8 ISSUED, JUDGEMENT AND SENTENCE ISSUED. BOND EXONERATED.

Which court heard State of Oklahoma v. Janet Maree Smith?

This case was heard in In the District Court in and for Tulsa County, Oklahoma, OK. The presiding judge was CF Docket C.

Who were the attorneys in State of Oklahoma v. Janet Maree Smith?

Plaintiff's attorney: Tulsa County District Attorney’s Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Tulsa Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.

When was State of Oklahoma v. Janet Maree Smith decided?

This case was decided on April 17, 2024.