Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Faust v. Moose Lodge #493 of Bellingham, Washington
Date: 11-16-2005
Case Number: 03-2-00859-8
Judge: Unknown
Court: Whatcom County, Washington
Plaintiff's Attorney:
James C. DeZao of DeZao and DiBrigida in Parsippany, New Jersey and Steve Chance, Bellingham, Washington
Defendant's Attorney: Unknown
Dram shop claims by the Faust family against Bellingham, Washington Moose Lodge #493. The plaintiffs' claimed that they suffered irreparable injuries including paraplegia to a 7-year-old boy. A drunk driver who was a member of the Moose Lodge caused the head-on collision in April 2000. Hawkeye Kinkaid, a member and patron of the Moose Lodge, was killed in the accident. He had been drinking for a number of hours before the accident on April 21, 2000. The accident that gave rise to the accident occurred a few miles from the lodge when Kinkaid's vehicle crossed the centerline on Labounty Road in Ferndale, Washington. The plaintiffs' claimed that Kinkaid had 0.26 blood alcohol level. The plaintiffs' claimed that the defendant acted negligently in hiring and supervising of the bartender at the Moose Lodge. They further claimed that as a direct result of the negligence of the bartender, Kinkaid left the Moose Lodge in a state of intoxication just prior to the accident.
The defenses
About This Case
What was the outcome of Faust v. Moose Lodge #493 of Bellingham, Washington?
The outcome was: Plaintiffs' verdict for $14.1 million.
Which court heard Faust v. Moose Lodge #493 of Bellingham, Washington?
This case was heard in Whatcom County, Washington, WA. The presiding judge was Unknown.
Who were the attorneys in Faust v. Moose Lodge #493 of Bellingham, Washington?
Plaintiff's attorney: James C. DeZao of DeZao and DiBrigida in Parsippany, New Jersey and Steve Chance, Bellingham, Washington. Defendant's attorney: Unknown.
When was Faust v. Moose Lodge #493 of Bellingham, Washington decided?
This case was decided on November 16, 2005.