Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Carter Reese
Date: 05-29-2025
Case Number: 5:25-cr-00195
Judge: Jeffrey L. Schmehl
Court: The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Plaintiff's Attorney: The United States Attorney’s Office for Philadelphia
Defendant's Attorney: Jason Hernandez and Patricia Redmond
Description:
Berks County Man Pleads Guilty to Art Fraud Scheme, Admits Selling Counterfeit Artworks to Customers
Carter Reese, 77, of Reading, Pennsylvania, entered a plea of guilty before United States District Court Judge Jeffrey L. Schmehl to one count of wire fraud and one count of mail fraud, in connection with a scheme in which he defrauded customers by making false representations about the source and authenticity of certain art purportedly created by prominent artists.
Reese was charged by information with those offenses earlier this month.
As detailed in court filings and admitted to by the defendant, from about February 2019 to March 2021, Reese sold and attempted to sell art that he represented as genuine pieces created by prominent artists, including Francis Bacon, Jean-Michel Basquiat, Jean Cocteau, Keith Haring, Fernand Léger, Roy Lichtenstein, Joan Miró, Pablo Picasso, Andy Warhol, and others.The case was investigated by members of the FBI's Art Crime Team assigned to the Philadelphia and Miami field offices and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Ruth Mandelbaum and Jason Grenell. Reese knew that the pieces were fake and had not been created by those artists.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with one count of wire fraud and one count of mail fraud
Berks County Man Pleads Guilty to Art Fraud Scheme, Admits Selling Counterfeit Artworks to Customers
Carter Reese, 77, of Reading, Pennsylvania, entered a plea of guilty before United States District Court Judge Jeffrey L. Schmehl to one count of wire fraud and one count of mail fraud, in connection with a scheme in which he defrauded customers by making false representations about the source and authenticity of certain art purportedly created by prominent artists.
Reese was charged by information with those offenses earlier this month.
As detailed in court filings and admitted to by the defendant, from about February 2019 to March 2021, Reese sold and attempted to sell art that he represented as genuine pieces created by prominent artists, including Francis Bacon, Jean-Michel Basquiat, Jean Cocteau, Keith Haring, Fernand Léger, Roy Lichtenstein, Joan Miró, Pablo Picasso, Andy Warhol, and others.The case was investigated by members of the FBI's Art Crime Team assigned to the Philadelphia and Miami field offices and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Ruth Mandelbaum and Jason Grenell. Reese knew that the pieces were fake and had not been created by those artists.
Outcome:
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Carter Reese?
The outcome was:
Which court heard United States of America v. Carter Reese?
This case was heard in The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, PA. The presiding judge was Jeffrey L. Schmehl.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Carter Reese?
Plaintiff's attorney: The United States Attorney’s Office for Philadelphia. Defendant's attorney: Jason Hernandez and Patricia Redmond.
When was United States of America v. Carter Reese decided?
This case was decided on May 29, 2025.