Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Jenny Espinal Tejada
Date: 02-05-2025
Case Number:
Judge: Joshua D. Wolson
Court: The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Plaintiff's Attorney: The United States Attorney’s Office for Philadelphia
Defendant's Attorney: Click Here For The Best Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Defrauding Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
Philadelphia Store Owner Sentenced to 18 Months in Prison for Defrauding Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
United States Attorney Jacqueline C. Romero announced that Jenny Espinal Tejada, 34, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, was sentenced by United States District Court Judge Joshua D. Wolson to 18 months in prison, $1,841,402 in restitution, and forfeiture of the proceeds of her offenses, for defrauding the U.S. government.
The defendant was charged in July of last year by superseding indictment and pleaded guilty in October to one count of wire fraud and one count of defrauding the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program ("SNAPâ€).
Espinal Tejada admitted that she used her small corner grocery store in Philadelphia to redeem SNAP benefits, even though she knew the store had not been approved to participate in SNAP as a merchant. She gained access to the program by misappropriating merchant identification numbers that had been assigned to stores that participated in the program legitimately. By using the misappropriated numbers, she was able to work around the rules of SNAP, and she further abused the program by trading benefits for cash in her store.
"Espinal Tejada sought to profit illicitly from the SNAP program, diverting nearly $2 million of the USDA's money,†said U.S. Attorney Romero. "On behalf of the folks who rely on these resources every day — and the taxpayers who fund the programs — we and our partners will continue to prosecute abuses like this and ensure that those who commit them are held appropriately accountable.â€
"SNAP was created to provide food and nutrition to those who truly need this assistance,†said Charmeka Parker, Special Agent in Charge with the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Office of Inspector General (USDA-OIG). "This joint investigation identified those who sought to profit from SNAP through illegal schemes. We are thankful to our law enforcement and prosecutorial partners and will continue to dedicate investigative resources in order to protect the integrity of these programs and bring those who commit fraud to justice.â€
The case was investigated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Office of Inspector General, Homeland Security Investigations, and the FBI and prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Elizabeth Abrams.
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Jenny Espinal Tejada?
The outcome was:
Which court heard United States of America v. Jenny Espinal Tejada?
This case was heard in The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, PA. The presiding judge was Joshua D. Wolson.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Jenny Espinal Tejada?
Plaintiff's attorney: The United States Attorney’s Office for Philadelphia. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was United States of America v. Jenny Espinal Tejada decided?
This case was decided on February 5, 2025.