Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Franklin Thad Harris and Merlin D. Unruh
Date: 05-06-2015
Case Number: 1:13-cr-00015-CMA
Judge: Christine M. Arugello
Court: United States District Court for the District of Colorado (Denver County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: Michelle Heldmyer
Defendant's Attorney: Rich Kornfeld and Alan Hassler for Franklin Thad Harris
Bill Richardson for Merline D. Unruh
Harris and Unruh were indicted by a federal grand jury in Denver on January 8, 2013, for charges of bank fraud and money laundering. The indictment remained under seal until their arrest on January 11, 2013. A superseding information was filed on April 14, 2014. Harris and Unruh plead guilty to one count of money laundering on July 17, 2014. They were sentenced on May 6, 2015.
According to information contained in court documents, including the stipulated facts contained in their plea agreements, Harris was in the business of constructing housing developments throughout the Grand Junction, Colorado, area. In the mid to late 2000s, Harris was involved in the purchase of several acres of land for various planned housing developments in Grand Junction. Financing for the projects came in the form of secured loans from First National Bank of the Rockies (FNBR). Harris's partner, Unruh, was in the construction business and was the general contractor on building projects with Harris. TDSM was a Colorado real estate development company incorporated in February 2003 and Harris and Unruh were sole members of the board of directors of TDSM. HARRIS was the President and Registered Agent of TDSM. Unruh was Secretary/Treasurer of TDSM. Unruh incorporated and was the registered agent for McGleeson, Inc., a construction company.
In 2010, several construction loans to Harris had become problem loans as they were in default with FNBR. The Special Assets Department of FNBR began to review the loans and identified potential fraud and requested an outside forensic audit which eventually lead to federal law enforcement agencies being notified. Between October 2007 and December 2008, Harris and Unruh obtained loan disbursements totaling $3,718,351.83. They submitting false and fraudulent expense documentation, primarily false invoices, which represented various types of construction work completed at both sites. In fact, much of the work reflected in the invoices had not been performed at the Chatfield site, and no work was done on the Thunder Valley development.
An IRS Special Agent conducted an analysis of the flow of funds and found Harris and Unruh, on numerous occasions, conducted a series of financial transactions after the draw money was deposited into their construction business account. They diverted funds meant to pay subcontractor invoices to private bank accounts and retirement accounts owned/controlled by them and their spouses.
This case was investigated by agents with Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and IRS Criminal Investigation (IRS CI).
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Franklin Thad Harris and Merl...?
The outcome was: See above
Which court heard United States of America v. Franklin Thad Harris and Merl...?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Colorado (Denver County), OK. The presiding judge was Christine M. Arugello.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Franklin Thad Harris and Merl...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Michelle Heldmyer. Defendant's attorney: Rich Kornfeld and Alan Hassler for Franklin Thad Harris Bill Richardson for Merline D. Unruh.
When was United States of America v. Franklin Thad Harris and Merl... decided?
This case was decided on May 6, 2015.