Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

State of Oklahoma v. S.D.

Date: 11-06-2026

Case Number: CM-2024-4597

Judge: Greg Lavender

Court: District Court, Tulsa County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: Tulsa County, Oklahoma District Attorney's Office

Defendant's Attorney: Kent Morlan

Description:

Tulsa,OK, criminal defense lawyer Kent Morlan represented the Defendant accused of making a telecommunication with the intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass, in violation of 21 O.S. 1172.

Outcome:

The Defendent elected to plead no contest because she would not risk being sentenced to a year in the tulsa county jail, and was given a 6 month deferred sentenced and was fined $350 and assessed a victim's compensation assessment of $150.00.

The fines, fees and assessments will cost her about $1,200.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of State of Oklahoma v. S.D.?

The outcome was: The Defendent elected to plead no contest because she would not risk being sentenced to a year in the tulsa county jail, and was given a 6 month deferred sentenced and was fined $350 and assessed a victim's compensation assessment of $150.00. The fines, fees and assessments will cost her about $1,200.

Which court heard State of Oklahoma v. S.D.?

This case was heard in District Court, Tulsa County, Oklahoma, OK. The presiding judge was Greg Lavender.

Who were the attorneys in State of Oklahoma v. S.D.?

Plaintiff's attorney: Tulsa County, Oklahoma District Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Kent Morlan.

When was State of Oklahoma v. S.D. decided?

This case was decided on November 6, 2026.