Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

State of Oklahoma v. Jamal Diggs

Date: 11-14-2025

Case Number: CF-2020-293

Judge: Stephen R. Pazzo

Court: District Court, Rogers County, OKlahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: Rogers County, Oklahoma, District Attorney's Office

Defendant's Attorney: Keaton taylor

Description:
Claremore, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer Keaton taylor represented the Defendant charged with:



ount # 2.

Count as Filed: ODO, CONSPIRACY TO DISTRIBUTE CDS, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-408

Date of Offense: 05/05/2020

Diggs, J



Count # 3.

Count as Filed: TAXS, POSSESSION OF CDS WITHOUT TAX STAMP AFFIXED, in violation of 68 O.S. 450.8(B)

Date of Offense: 05/05/2020

Diggs, J



Count # 4.

Count as Filed: DMLWT, ACQUIRED PROCEEDS FROM DRUG ACTIVITY, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-503.1(A)

Date of Offense: 05/05/2020
Outcome:
UDGE PAZZO; CR: LARIMER; ST BY WADE & PEAK. DFT PRESENT WITH HIS ATTORNEY TAYLOR. CASE COMES ON FOR JURY TRIAL. OUTSIDE OF THE PRESENCE OF THE JURY. PARTIES CONFERENCE AND JURY INSTRUCTIONS ARE APPROVED. JURORS PRESENT AND CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS ARE GIVEN. CLOSING ARGUMENTS HEARD. JURORS EXCUSED TO DELIBERATIONS. JURY DELIBERATES AND ISSUE THE FOLLOWING VERDICT:

COUNT 1: POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE- MARIJUANA- GUILTY

COUNT 2: CONSPIRACY TO DISTRIBUTE CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE- GUILTY

COUNT 3: POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE WITHOUT TAX STAMP AFFIXED- GUILTY

COUNT 4: ACQUIRE PROCEEDS FROM DRUG ACTIVITY- GUILTY



DURING THE SECOND STAGE OF THE JURY TRIAL JURORS PRESENT; ARGUMENTS HEARD. THE JURORS DELIBERATED AND FOUND THE DFT GUILTY AND FIX PUNISHMENT AS FOLLOWS;

COUNT 1: POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE- MARIJUANA- GUILTY AND FIX PUNISHMENT AT 4 YEARS DOC AND A $5,000 FINE

COUNT 2: CONSPIRACY TO DISTRIBUTE CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE- GUILTY AND FIX PUNISHMENT AT 4 YEARS DOC AND $5,000 FINE

COUNT 3: POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE WITHOUT TAX STAMP AFFIXED- GUILTY AND FIX PUNISHMENT AT 4 YEARS DOC AND $5,000 FINE

COUNT 4: ACQUIRE PROCEEDS FROM DRUG ACTIVITY- GUILTY AND FIX PUNISHMENT AT 6 YEARS AND $2.500 FINE



STATE AND DEFENSE WAIVE POLLING OF JURORS. JURORS EXCUSED. COURT REMANDS DFT INTO THE CUSTODY OF RCJ TO BE HELD WITHOUT BOND. COURT ORDERS PSI AND SETS MATTER FOR FORMAL SENTENCING ON 12/16 AT 1:30PM. PIZZA WAS ORDERED FOR THE JURORS AND PAID FOR FROM THE COURT FUND.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of State of Oklahoma v. Jamal Diggs?

The outcome was: UDGE PAZZO; CR: LARIMER; ST BY WADE & PEAK. DFT PRESENT WITH HIS ATTORNEY TAYLOR. CASE COMES ON FOR JURY TRIAL. OUTSIDE OF THE PRESENCE OF THE JURY. PARTIES CONFERENCE AND JURY INSTRUCTIONS ARE APPROVED. JURORS PRESENT AND CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS ARE GIVEN. CLOSING ARGUMENTS HEARD. JURORS EXCUSED TO DELIBERATIONS. JURY DELIBERATES AND ISSUE THE FOLLOWING VERDICT: COUNT 1: POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE- MARIJUANA- GUILTY COUNT 2: CONSPIRACY TO DISTRIBUTE CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE- GUILTY COUNT 3: POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE WITHOUT TAX STAMP AFFIXED- GUILTY COUNT 4: ACQUIRE PROCEEDS FROM DRUG ACTIVITY- GUILTY DURING THE SECOND STAGE OF THE JURY TRIAL JURORS PRESENT; ARGUMENTS HEARD. THE JURORS DELIBERATED AND FOUND THE DFT GUILTY AND FIX PUNISHMENT AS FOLLOWS; COUNT 1: POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE- MARIJUANA- GUILTY AND FIX PUNISHMENT AT 4 YEARS DOC AND A $5,000 FINE COUNT 2: CONSPIRACY TO DISTRIBUTE CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE- GUILTY AND FIX PUNISHMENT AT 4 YEARS DOC AND $5,000 FINE COUNT 3: POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE WITHOUT TAX STAMP AFFIXED- GUILTY AND FIX PUNISHMENT AT 4 YEARS DOC AND $5,000 FINE COUNT 4: ACQUIRE PROCEEDS FROM DRUG ACTIVITY- GUILTY AND FIX PUNISHMENT AT 6 YEARS AND $2.500 FINE STATE AND DEFENSE WAIVE POLLING OF JURORS. JURORS EXCUSED. COURT REMANDS DFT INTO THE CUSTODY OF RCJ TO BE HELD WITHOUT BOND. COURT ORDERS PSI AND SETS MATTER FOR FORMAL SENTENCING ON 12/16 AT 1:30PM. PIZZA WAS ORDERED FOR THE JURORS AND PAID FOR FROM THE COURT FUND.

Which court heard State of Oklahoma v. Jamal Diggs?

This case was heard in District Court, Rogers County, OKlahoma, OK. The presiding judge was Stephen R. Pazzo.

Who were the attorneys in State of Oklahoma v. Jamal Diggs?

Plaintiff's attorney: Rogers County, Oklahoma, District Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Keaton taylor.

When was State of Oklahoma v. Jamal Diggs decided?

This case was decided on November 14, 2025.