Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
State of Oklahoma v. B.C.J.
Date: 05-07-2025
Case Number: CF-2024-08
Judge: Pamela B. Hammers
Court: In the District Court in and for Creek County, Oklahoma
Plaintiff's Attorney: Creek County District Attorney’s Office
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Sapulpa Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Description:
Sapulpa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with:
OMITTING TO PROVIDE FOR MINOR CHILD
624 South Denver, Suite 300
One Block South of the Courthouse
Free Internet Marketing
Broadband Internet Access & Answering Service
Full-Time Receptionist - 24/7 Access
Virtual Offices Starting at $50 a month.
Physical Offices Starting at $300 a month.
Month-to-Month
Multiple Private Conference Rooms - Hourly & Daily Rental
Reduce Your Overhead with MoreLaw Suites
918-582-3993 - Info@MoreLaw.com
OMITTING TO PROVIDE FOR MINOR CHILD
MoreLaw Suites
624 South Denver, Suite 300
One Block South of the Courthouse
Free Internet Marketing
Broadband Internet Access & Answering Service
Full-Time Receptionist - 24/7 Access
Virtual Offices Starting at $50 a month.
Physical Offices Starting at $300 a month.
Month-to-Month
Multiple Private Conference Rooms - Hourly & Daily Rental
Reduce Your Overhead with MoreLaw Suites
918-582-3993 - Info@MoreLaw.com
Outcome:
Continued to 11/04/2025.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of State of Oklahoma v. B.C.J.?
The outcome was: Continued to 11/04/2025.
Which court heard State of Oklahoma v. B.C.J.?
This case was heard in In the District Court in and for Creek County, Oklahoma, OK. The presiding judge was Pamela B. Hammers.
Who were the attorneys in State of Oklahoma v. B.C.J.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Creek County District Attorney’s Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Sapulpa Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was State of Oklahoma v. B.C.J. decided?
This case was decided on May 7, 2025.