Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

State of Oklahoma v. Dominique Devine Johnson

Date: 09-02-2022

Case Number: CF-2022-1344

Judge: Amy Palulmlbo

Court: In the District Court in and for Oklahoma County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: Oklahoma County District Attorney's Office



Defendant's Attorney:









Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan



Click Here For The Best Tulsa Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory





Description:
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with:

Failure to Comply with Violent Crime Offenders Registration Act



Count # 1. Count as Filed: SEXV, FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH VIOLENT CRIME OFFENDERS REGISTRATION ACT, in violation of 57 O.S. 581 - 590.1

Date of Offense: 01/13/2022

Party Name Disposition Information

JOHNSON, DOMINIQUE DEVINE Disposed: DISMISSED, 09/02/2022. Dismissed- Request of the State

Count as Disposed: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH VIOLENT CRIME OFFENDERS REGISTRATION ACT(SEXV)

Violation of 57 O.S. 581 - 590.
Outcome:
09-02-2022



AMY PALUMBO , JUDGE: CASE DISPOSED. STATE DISMISSES BEST INTEREST OF JUSTICE WITHOUT COST.

Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of State of Oklahoma v. Dominique Devine Johnson?

The outcome was: 09-02-2022 AMY PALUMBO , JUDGE: CASE DISPOSED. STATE DISMISSES BEST INTEREST OF JUSTICE WITHOUT COST.

Which court heard State of Oklahoma v. Dominique Devine Johnson?

This case was heard in In the District Court in and for Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, OK. The presiding judge was Amy Palulmlbo.

Who were the attorneys in State of Oklahoma v. Dominique Devine Johnson?

Plaintiff's attorney: Oklahoma County District Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan Click Here For The Best Tulsa Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.

When was State of Oklahoma v. Dominique Devine Johnson decided?

This case was decided on September 2, 2022.