Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Twenty-One Plaintiffs in Ohio v. Buckeye Egg

Date: 09-13-2001

Case Number: Unknown

Judge: Unknown

Court: Court of Common Pleas, Licking County, Ohio

Plaintiff's Attorney: <a href="http://www.morelaw.com/lawyers" target="_new">John W. Sproat</a> of Britt, Campbell, Nagel & Sproat, Columbus, Ohio

Defendant's Attorney: Tom Rosenberg of Ulmer & Berne, L.L.P., Cleveland, Ohio

Description:
Plaintiffs claimed that Buckeye Egg created noxious orders, fly infestations and water pollution as a result of the operation of its egg production facilities that had a capacity for 11 million hens and 4 million young chickens at barns in Wyandot, Hardin and Licking counties in Ohio.
Outcome:
Plaintiffs' verdict for $19.7 million.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Unknown
Defendant's Experts:
Unknown
Comments:
None

About This Case

What was the outcome of Twenty-One Plaintiffs in Ohio v. Buckeye Egg?

The outcome was: Plaintiffs' verdict for $19.7 million.

Which court heard Twenty-One Plaintiffs in Ohio v. Buckeye Egg?

This case was heard in Court of Common Pleas, Licking County, Ohio, OH. The presiding judge was Unknown.

Who were the attorneys in Twenty-One Plaintiffs in Ohio v. Buckeye Egg?

Plaintiff's attorney: John W. Sproat of Britt, Campbell, Nagel & Sproat, Columbus, Ohio. Defendant's attorney: Tom Rosenberg of Ulmer & Berne, L.L.P., Cleveland, Ohio.

When was Twenty-One Plaintiffs in Ohio v. Buckeye Egg decided?

This case was decided on September 13, 2001.