Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

STATE OF OHIO - vs - DESHAWN DAJUAN RIPPEY

Date: 06-20-2018

Case Number: CA2017-12-186

Judge: Per Curiam

Court: COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY

Plaintiff's Attorney: Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney

Defendant's Attorney: Mary K. Martin

Description:
This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of

the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the

Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel.

{ΒΆ 2} Counsel for appellant, DeShawn DaJuan Rippey, has filed a brief with this court

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that

a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the

trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be

predicated; (2) lists two potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at

744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to

determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant

on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief

and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.
Outcome:
Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having

been received we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of STATE OF OHIO - vs - DESHAWN DAJUAN RIPPEY?

The outcome was: Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

Which court heard STATE OF OHIO - vs - DESHAWN DAJUAN RIPPEY?

This case was heard in COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY, OH. The presiding judge was Per Curiam.

Who were the attorneys in STATE OF OHIO - vs - DESHAWN DAJUAN RIPPEY?

Plaintiff's attorney: Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney. Defendant's attorney: Mary K. Martin.

When was STATE OF OHIO - vs - DESHAWN DAJUAN RIPPEY decided?

This case was decided on June 20, 2018.