Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

STATE OF OHIO - vs - THERESA D. HAWKINS-STEPHENS

Date: 05-22-2018

Case Number: CA2017-08-128

Judge: Per Curiam

Court: IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY

Plaintiff's Attorney: Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, John C. Heinkel, Government Services Center

Defendant's Attorney: Michele Temmel

Description:
This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of

the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the

Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon a brief and amended brief filed by

appellant's counsel.



Counsel for appellant, Theresa D. Hawkins-Stephens, has filed a brief with this

court pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1)

indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any

errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of

error may be predicated; (2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal,"

Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently

to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement

of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both

the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.
Outcome:
Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having

been received we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of STATE OF OHIO - vs - THERESA D. HAWKINS-STEPHENS?

The outcome was: Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

Which court heard STATE OF OHIO - vs - THERESA D. HAWKINS-STEPHENS?

This case was heard in IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY, OH. The presiding judge was Per Curiam.

Who were the attorneys in STATE OF OHIO - vs - THERESA D. HAWKINS-STEPHENS?

Plaintiff's attorney: Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, John C. Heinkel, Government Services Center. Defendant's attorney: Michele Temmel.

When was STATE OF OHIO - vs - THERESA D. HAWKINS-STEPHENS decided?

This case was decided on May 22, 2018.