Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
State of New York v. James G. Breitenstein
Date: 12-18-1997
Case Number: Unknown
Judge: Benza
Court: New York Court of Claims
Plaintiff's Attorney: Dennis G. Vacco, Attorney General of New York (Michael Buskus, of counsel)
Defendant's Attorney: Daniel G. Vincelette of Cusick, Hacker & Murphy, Latham, New York
The appropiation resulted in no loss of frontage but a significant change in the elevation resulted. The access was essentially at grade before the taking and 9.4 feet after the construction of the improvements. The property owner paid $523 an acre for the property in 1977 and had done nothing to improve the property. Property owner claimed that the change in grade of the new road was going to damage the remaining property and that an access road would be needed to cure the damages to the remainder.
About This Case
What was the outcome of State of New York v. James G. Breitenstein?
The outcome was: Property owner granted $10,500 per acre for the property taken or $181,027.00.
Which court heard State of New York v. James G. Breitenstein?
This case was heard in New York Court of Claims, NY. The presiding judge was Benza.
Who were the attorneys in State of New York v. James G. Breitenstein?
Plaintiff's attorney: Dennis G. Vacco, Attorney General of New York (Michael Buskus, of counsel). Defendant's attorney: Daniel G. Vincelette of Cusick, Hacker & Murphy, Latham, New York.
When was State of New York v. James G. Breitenstein decided?
This case was decided on December 18, 1997.