Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Lori Smero v. City of Saratoga and Saratoga Youth Hockey, Inc.
Date: 09-05-2018
Case Number: 0000833/2015
Judge: Thomas Nolan
Court: Supreme Court, Saratoga County, New York
Plaintiff's Attorney: George Szary
Defendant's Attorney: Matthew Kelly, Theresa J. Puleo
Description:
Saratoga Springs, NY - Lori Smero, Individually and as Parent and Guardian of Rachel Smero, a minor, , age 15, sued The City and the Saratoga Youth Hockey, Inc. on a negligence theory claiming that their daughter was hit in the head by a hockey puck as she walked in down stairs in the City owned Vernon Rick.
In 2014, plaintiffs' 10-year old daughter (hereinafter the
child) sustained injuries to her head when she was struck by an
errant hockey puck that left the ice while she was spectating a
youth hockey practice at Vernon Rink in Saratoga County. As a
result of this incident, plaintiffs commenced this negligence
action against defendants, the City of Saratoga Springs and
Saratoga Youth Hockey, Inc., to recover for the child's
injuries.1 In their complaint, plaintiffs allege that defendants
were negligent by failing, among other things, to install proper
safety netting or barriers in the area where the child was
injured, to construct or maintain the rink in a safe manner, and
to supervise, control and maintain the activities occurring on
the ice. After issue was joined and discovery was completed,
defendants each moved for summary judgment dismissing the
complaint against them, arguing that, as a spectator at the
hockey practice, the child had assumed the risk of being injured
by an errant hockey puck. Finding that there were triable issues
of fact, Supreme Court denied defendants' motions for summary
judgment.
In 2014, plaintiffs' 10-year old daughter (hereinafter the
child) sustained injuries to her head when she was struck by an
errant hockey puck that left the ice while she was spectating a
youth hockey practice at Vernon Rink in Saratoga County. As a
result of this incident, plaintiffs commenced this negligence
action against defendants, the City of Saratoga Springs and
Saratoga Youth Hockey, Inc., to recover for the child's
injuries.1 In their complaint, plaintiffs allege that defendants
were negligent by failing, among other things, to install proper
safety netting or barriers in the area where the child was
injured, to construct or maintain the rink in a safe manner, and
to supervise, control and maintain the activities occurring on
the ice. After issue was joined and discovery was completed,
defendants each moved for summary judgment dismissing the
complaint against them, arguing that, as a spectator at the
hockey practice, the child had assumed the risk of being injured
by an errant hockey puck. Finding that there were triable issues
of fact, Supreme Court denied defendants' motions for summary
judgment.
Outcome:
Plaintiff's verdict for $1.22 million.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Lori Smero v. City of Saratoga and Saratoga Youth Hockey,...?
The outcome was: Plaintiff's verdict for $1.22 million.
Which court heard Lori Smero v. City of Saratoga and Saratoga Youth Hockey,...?
This case was heard in Supreme Court, Saratoga County, New York, NY. The presiding judge was Thomas Nolan.
Who were the attorneys in Lori Smero v. City of Saratoga and Saratoga Youth Hockey,...?
Plaintiff's attorney: George Szary. Defendant's attorney: Matthew Kelly, Theresa J. Puleo.
When was Lori Smero v. City of Saratoga and Saratoga Youth Hockey,... decided?
This case was decided on September 5, 2018.