Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Mary McGinnis and Thomas McGinnis v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
Date: 04-13-2018
Case Number:
Judge: James J. DeLuca
Court: Superior Court, Bergen County, New Jersey
Plaintiff's Attorney: Adam Slater
Defendant's Attorney: Lori Cohen
Description:
Hackensack, NJ - Mary McGinnis and Thomas McGinnis sued C.R. Bard, Inc. on product liability and loss of consortium theories claiming that they were damaged and harmed as a direct result of the use of Defendant's pelvic mesh implant product. Plaintiffs claimed that Mary was inadequately informed of the risks associated with the use of the product to treat her gynecological problems.
The pelvic implant mesh was developed and sold for the treatment of vagin prolapse.
C.R. Bard, Inc. is a subsidiary of Becton-Dickinson.
The pelvic implant mesh was developed and sold for the treatment of vagin prolapse.
C.R. Bard, Inc. is a subsidiary of Becton-Dickinson.
Outcome:
Plaintiffs' verdict for $33 million in compensatory damages and $35 million in punitive damages.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Mary McGinnis and Thomas McGinnis v. C.R. Bard, Inc.?
The outcome was: Plaintiffs' verdict for $33 million in compensatory damages and $35 million in punitive damages.
Which court heard Mary McGinnis and Thomas McGinnis v. C.R. Bard, Inc.?
This case was heard in Superior Court, Bergen County, New Jersey, NJ. The presiding judge was James J. DeLuca.
Who were the attorneys in Mary McGinnis and Thomas McGinnis v. C.R. Bard, Inc.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Adam Slater. Defendant's attorney: Lori Cohen.
When was Mary McGinnis and Thomas McGinnis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. decided?
This case was decided on April 13, 2018.