Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Rohini Meka, et al. v. Hani Haddad, et al.
Date: 10-10-2025
Case Number: 20-cv-11685
Judge: Mark G. Mastroianni
Court: United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (Hampden County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Springfield Personal Injury Law Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Springfield Insurance Defense Lawyer Directory
Description:
Springfield, Massachusetts, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs on a medical malpractice claim.
The plaintiffs, Rohini Meka and her husband, Suresh Chirumamilla, filed suit on September 18, 2020, in the District of Massachusetts. They named as defendants Dr. Hani Haddad, Valley Women's Health Group, LLC, and Jane/John Doe (collectively, "the defendants"). The complaint, premised on diversity jurisdiction, see 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), asserted various Massachusetts law claims stemming from Meka's treatment during the labor and delivery of her son, Pranav Chirumamilla. The plaintiffs' claim that Dr. Haddad, in violation of Massachusetts law, failed to obtain Meka's informed consent before performing a forceps-assisted delivery of her son because he failed to instruct Meka of the risks associated with that procedure prior to the operation.1 The claim alleges that the use of the procedure resulted in Meka suffering a pelvic fracture.
The plaintiffs, Rohini Meka and her husband, Suresh Chirumamilla, filed suit on September 18, 2020, in the District of Massachusetts. They named as defendants Dr. Hani Haddad, Valley Women's Health Group, LLC, and Jane/John Doe (collectively, "the defendants"). The complaint, premised on diversity jurisdiction, see 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), asserted various Massachusetts law claims stemming from Meka's treatment during the labor and delivery of her son, Pranav Chirumamilla. The plaintiffs' claim that Dr. Haddad, in violation of Massachusetts law, failed to obtain Meka's informed consent before performing a forceps-assisted delivery of her son because he failed to instruct Meka of the risks associated with that procedure prior to the operation.1 The claim alleges that the use of the procedure resulted in Meka suffering a pelvic fracture.
Outcome:
Motion for summary judgment granted.
Affirmed
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Rohini Meka, et al. v. Hani Haddad, et al.?
The outcome was: Motion for summary judgment granted. Affirmed
Which court heard Rohini Meka, et al. v. Hani Haddad, et al.?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (Hampden County), MA. The presiding judge was Mark G. Mastroianni.
Who were the attorneys in Rohini Meka, et al. v. Hani Haddad, et al.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Springfield Personal Injury Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Springfield Insurance Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was Rohini Meka, et al. v. Hani Haddad, et al. decided?
This case was decided on October 10, 2025.