Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Stephen D. Woodbridge v. The City of Greenfield

Date: 06-18-2025

Case Number: 23-CV-30093

Judge: Mark G. Mastroianni

Court: United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (Hampden County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Michael Aleo and Thomas Lesser

Defendant's Attorney: Gordon Quinn

Description:
Springfield, Massachusetts personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Civil Rights Act violation theory.



* * *



The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a landmark US law that prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. It addresses discrimination in various areas including voting, public accommodations, public education, and employment. The Act is considered a cornerstone of US civil rights law and a major achievement of the civil rights movement.



Here's a more detailed breakdown:



Prohibits Discrimination:



The Act outlaws discrimination based on the five protected characteristics in various settings.



Voting Rights:



It addressed unequal application of voter registration requirements.



Public Accommodations:



It outlawed segregation in public places like restaurants, hotels, and theaters.



Public Education:



The Act mandated desegregation of public schools and other public facilities.



Employment:



It banned discrimination in hiring, promotion, and other aspects of employment.

Federally Funded Programs:



The Act prohibits discrimination in programs receiving federal financial assistance.



Key Titles:



Title VII, for example, specifically addresses employment discrimination.

Enforcement:



The Act established agencies and expanded federal programs to enforce its provisions.



Historical Significance:



The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a major milestone in the fight for equality and continues to be relevant in contemporary discussions about civil rights and discrimination.

Outcome:
Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Stephen D. Woodbridge v. The City of Greenfield?

The outcome was: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed.

Which court heard Stephen D. Woodbridge v. The City of Greenfield?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (Hampden County), MA. The presiding judge was Mark G. Mastroianni.

Who were the attorneys in Stephen D. Woodbridge v. The City of Greenfield?

Plaintiff's attorney: Michael Aleo and Thomas Lesser. Defendant's attorney: Gordon Quinn.

When was Stephen D. Woodbridge v. The City of Greenfield decided?

This case was decided on June 18, 2025.