Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Earl Miller
Date: 08-27-2025
Case Number: 20-Cr-48
Judge: Jon E. DeGuilio
Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana (St. Joseph County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in South Bend
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best * Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory
In 2009, Miller was hired by a childhood friend, Matthew
Gingerich, to raise money for Gingerich's real estate invest
ment firm, 5 Star Investments. 5 Star raised capital to finance
the rehabilitation of properties, mostly in Northern Indiana
where the company was based, by issuing promissory notes
to investors in exchange for their contributions. These notes
promised investors around 10% in returns paid out in
monthly installments over 30 months, at which time the in
vestors were promised to be paid their principal investment.
By 2011, Miller co-owned 5 Star with Gingerich and was
solely responsible for the investor side of the business. In this
role, Miller, with the assistance of 5 Star's legal counsel, pre
pared 5 Star's Private Placement Memoranda (PPMs), which
served as investment contracts. The PPMs generally assured
investors that 5 Star planned to use the funds for residential
real estate investments and would not allocate them to non
real estate ventures without prior agreement. The PPMs in
cluded various other promises, including that Miller would
not be paid a salary, that 5 Star would not advertise invest
ment opportunities through general solicitation, and that
securities would be sold only to "accredited†or "sophisti
cated†investors.
In July 2014, Miller bought out Gingerich for $2.5 million
and became the sole owner of 5 Star. By that time the business
had grown into 15 related LLCs operating under the 5 Star
name and expanded to include properties outside of Indiana.
As the sole owner, Miller was responsible for both the invest
ment and operations sides of the business. He also became the
sole signatory on company checks and the sole decisionmaker
regarding the spending of investor funds.
Shortly after Miller took over 5 Star, he began diverting
investor funds for personal purposes contrary to the terms in
the PPMs. Between July 2014 and August 2015, Miller used
over $645,000 in investor money to help pay off his debt to
Gingerich; he paid over $214,000 to a personal spiritual advi
sor; and he personally pocketed over $914,000 directly out of
Also contrary to the PPMs, Miller ran advertising cam
paigns, which he mainly targeted toward the Amish commu
nity in Indiana. Many of the Amish investors that Miller tar
geted had an eighth-grade education and limited or no invest
ing experience. Miller himself was raised in an Amish com
munity.
Starting in February 2015, Miller also began to wire inves
tor funds to various "green products†companies that were
operated by his friends. Miller did no due diligence on these
businesses, nor did he seek investor permission before mak
ing payments. Miller eventually developed and issued a new
PPM in March 2015, which stated that 5 Star was expanding
its business into green energy products, though, by then, he
had already transferred hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Further, the new PPM included false statements about 5 Star's
plans for those investments. For example, the PPM repre
sented that 5 Star would use investor money to distribute
green products for which 5 Star owned the patent. But 5 Star
held no such patents and never had plans to distribute any
such products. Miller ultimately wired over $1.7 million of in
vestor money to his friends' companies, and the payments
made little to no returns for investors.
By July 2015, 5 Star was struggling financially and it had
stopped paying out returns to its investors, though Miller
continued to solicit and accept new investments anyway.
Around this time, Miller again used investor funds without
authorization to hire a company, Global Impact, to take over
the day-to-day management of 5 Star and turn the company
around. Miller also used investor funds to hire a law firm,
Cozen O'Connor, to handle legal issues. Soon after Global Im
pact was hired, with investors calling 5 Star's offices asking
for their unpaid interest checks, Miller left town and took his
family to Florida. While he was away, Miller continued to
make wire transfers between and out of 5 Star accounts.
Global Impact continued to run 5 Star until early 2016 when
Miller filed for bankruptcy and a trustee assumed control of
the 5 Star entities.
and five counts of wire fraud. It acquitted him on one wire
fraud count relating to one victim who did not testify and on
the false statement charge in connection with the bankruptcy
proceedings. Miller filed a post-trial motion for acquittal,
which the district court denied.
Affirmed
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Earl Miller?
The outcome was: A jury convicted Miller on one count of securities fraud and five counts of wire fraud. It acquitted him on one wire fraud count relating to one victim who did not testify and on the false statement charge in connection with the bankruptcy proceedings. Miller filed a post-trial motion for acquittal, which the district court denied. Affirmed
Which court heard United States of America v. Earl Miller?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana (St. Joseph County), IN. The presiding judge was Jon E. DeGuilio.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Earl Miller?
Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in South Bend. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best * Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.
When was United States of America v. Earl Miller decided?
This case was decided on August 27, 2025.