Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
State of Illinois v. Pezhman Gilani Yahyavi and Mahmood Bashang
Date: 02-27-2026
Case Number:
Judge: Not Available
Court: Circuit Court, DuPage County, Illinois
Plaintiff's Attorney: DuPage County, Illinois, District Attorney's Office
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Wheaton Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Description:
Wheaton, Illinois, criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with armed robbery.
Pezhman Gilani Yahyavi, 46, and Mahmood Bashang, 30, were each charged one count of disorderly conduct, falsely reporting a crime.
Bashang allegedly told the dispatcher the two were jewelry vendors returning from a show in Rosemont when three armed offenders robbed them of between $1.5 million and $2 million worth of mostly 14-karat gold jewelry.
Pezhman Gilani Yahyavi, 46, and Mahmood Bashang, 30, were each charged one count of disorderly conduct, falsely reporting a crime.
Bashang allegedly told the dispatcher the two were jewelry vendors returning from a show in Rosemont when three armed offenders robbed them of between $1.5 million and $2 million worth of mostly 14-karat gold jewelry.
Outcome:
A criminal charge is not proof of guilt.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of State of Illinois v. Pezhman Gilani Yahyavi and Mahmood B...?
The outcome was: A criminal charge is not proof of guilt.
Which court heard State of Illinois v. Pezhman Gilani Yahyavi and Mahmood B...?
This case was heard in Circuit Court, DuPage County, Illinois, IL. The presiding judge was Not Available.
Who were the attorneys in State of Illinois v. Pezhman Gilani Yahyavi and Mahmood B...?
Plaintiff's attorney: DuPage County, Illinois, District Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Wheaton Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was State of Illinois v. Pezhman Gilani Yahyavi and Mahmood B... decided?
This case was decided on February 27, 2026.