Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
John Gary Butler v. Cynthia Prine
Date: 02-20-2015
Case Number: 2D14-2561
Judge: Per Curiam
Court: Florida Court of Appeal, Second District on appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County
Plaintiff's Attorney: Toni Butler of Alderuccio & Butler, LLC, Naples, for Appellant.
Defendant's Attorney: Kathy Welsh of KM Welsh, P.A., Largo, for Appellee.
entered in a postdissolution proceeding that resolved several postjudgment motions and
petitions that had been filed on his behalf, as well as on behalf of his former wife,
Cynthia Prine. Mr. Butler raises several issues concerning the trial court's findings,
rulings, and awards that are set forth in the supplemental final judgment. We affirm in
all respects without discussion except for $93,202.26 in attorney's fees that was
- 2 -
awarded to Ms. Prine. The evidence presented to the trial court justified a fee award of
some amount in this case. However, we are unconvinced that the trial court adequately
considered the reasonableness and necessity of all of the legal work underlying these
fees. Accordingly, we reverse only the award of attorney's fees and remand that matter
to permit the trial court to reconsider the award. On remand, the court is authorized to
receive evidence in addition to the evidence in this record.
About This Case
What was the outcome of John Gary Butler v. Cynthia Prine?
The outcome was: Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Which court heard John Gary Butler v. Cynthia Prine?
This case was heard in Florida Court of Appeal, Second District on appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, FL. The presiding judge was Per Curiam.
Who were the attorneys in John Gary Butler v. Cynthia Prine?
Plaintiff's attorney: Toni Butler of Alderuccio & Butler, LLC, Naples, for Appellant.. Defendant's attorney: Kathy Welsh of KM Welsh, P.A., Largo, for Appellee..
When was John Gary Butler v. Cynthia Prine decided?
This case was decided on February 20, 2015.